Quantifying contributions of geographical features to urban GDP outputs via interpretable machine learning

IF 12 1区 工程技术 Q1 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY Sustainable Cities and Society Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-10 DOI:10.1016/j.scs.2025.106185
Peiran Zhang , Haonan Guo , Fabiano L. Ribeiro , Pavel L. Kirillov , Alla G. Makhrova , Ziyou Gao , Liang Gao
{"title":"Quantifying contributions of geographical features to urban GDP outputs via interpretable machine learning","authors":"Peiran Zhang ,&nbsp;Haonan Guo ,&nbsp;Fabiano L. Ribeiro ,&nbsp;Pavel L. Kirillov ,&nbsp;Alla G. Makhrova ,&nbsp;Ziyou Gao ,&nbsp;Liang Gao","doi":"10.1016/j.scs.2025.106185","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Urban scaling laws, which assume homogeneous population interactions, traditionally describe the relationship between urban population and GDP. However, this approach often overlooks the complexity of urban environments, particularly geographical features such as land use, road networks, and points of interest, which significantly shape urban economies. To address this gap, we propose an interpretable machine learning framework that quantifies the impact of urban geographical features (UGFs) on economic outputs (GDP) across five countries: the USA, Brazil, Nigeria, China, and India. Our study can be summarized in three parts: (1) Using the CatBoost algorithm for GDP estimation, which achieves an average <span><math><msup><mrow><mi>R</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msup></math></span> of 0.96 across countries, we demonstrate the substantial effects of UGFs (2) The Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) method is employed to quantify feature contributions on GDP, revealing that UGFs account for 45% to 89% variance, with influences differing across and within countries. (3) By classifying cities based on feature contribution vectors, we show that cities with similar GDP levels often exhibit analogous contributions from both population and UGFs, suggesting that shared strategies could be applied to cities with comparable economic profiles. Our findings provide valuable insights into the role of UGFs in shaping GDP, advancing the understanding of how UGFs influence economic development, and offering policymakers more informed suggestions. Furthermore, this framework opens new opportunities to integrate diverse urban features into urban studies through machine learning, enhancing our understanding of the complexity of urban systems.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48659,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable Cities and Society","volume":"121 ","pages":"Article 106185"},"PeriodicalIF":12.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sustainable Cities and Society","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210670725000630","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Urban scaling laws, which assume homogeneous population interactions, traditionally describe the relationship between urban population and GDP. However, this approach often overlooks the complexity of urban environments, particularly geographical features such as land use, road networks, and points of interest, which significantly shape urban economies. To address this gap, we propose an interpretable machine learning framework that quantifies the impact of urban geographical features (UGFs) on economic outputs (GDP) across five countries: the USA, Brazil, Nigeria, China, and India. Our study can be summarized in three parts: (1) Using the CatBoost algorithm for GDP estimation, which achieves an average R2 of 0.96 across countries, we demonstrate the substantial effects of UGFs (2) The Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) method is employed to quantify feature contributions on GDP, revealing that UGFs account for 45% to 89% variance, with influences differing across and within countries. (3) By classifying cities based on feature contribution vectors, we show that cities with similar GDP levels often exhibit analogous contributions from both population and UGFs, suggesting that shared strategies could be applied to cities with comparable economic profiles. Our findings provide valuable insights into the role of UGFs in shaping GDP, advancing the understanding of how UGFs influence economic development, and offering policymakers more informed suggestions. Furthermore, this framework opens new opportunities to integrate diverse urban features into urban studies through machine learning, enhancing our understanding of the complexity of urban systems.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过可解释的机器学习量化地理特征对城市GDP产出的贡献
传统上,城市尺度规律描述了城市人口与GDP之间的关系,该规律假设了人口之间的均匀相互作用。然而,这种方法往往忽视了城市环境的复杂性,特别是土地利用、道路网络和兴趣点等地理特征,这些特征对城市经济有着重大影响。为了解决这一差距,我们提出了一个可解释的机器学习框架,该框架量化了美国、巴西、尼日利亚、中国和印度这五个国家的城市地理特征(ugf)对经济产出(GDP)的影响。我们的研究可以概括为三个部分:(1)使用CatBoost算法进行GDP估计,其在各国之间的平均R2为0.96,我们证明了ugf的实质性影响。(2)使用Shapley加性解释(SHAP)方法量化特征对GDP的贡献,发现ugf占45%至89%的方差,其影响在国家之间和国家内部有所不同。(3)通过基于特征贡献向量的城市分类,我们发现GDP水平相似的城市往往表现出类似的人口和ugf贡献,这表明共享策略可以应用于具有可比经济概况的城市。我们的研究结果为ugf在塑造GDP中的作用提供了有价值的见解,促进了对ugf如何影响经济发展的理解,并为政策制定者提供了更明智的建议。此外,该框架为通过机器学习将不同的城市特征整合到城市研究中提供了新的机会,增强了我们对城市系统复杂性的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Sustainable Cities and Society
Sustainable Cities and Society Social Sciences-Geography, Planning and Development
CiteScore
22.00
自引率
13.70%
发文量
810
审稿时长
27 days
期刊介绍: Sustainable Cities and Society (SCS) is an international journal that focuses on fundamental and applied research to promote environmentally sustainable and socially resilient cities. The journal welcomes cross-cutting, multi-disciplinary research in various areas, including: 1. Smart cities and resilient environments; 2. Alternative/clean energy sources, energy distribution, distributed energy generation, and energy demand reduction/management; 3. Monitoring and improving air quality in built environment and cities (e.g., healthy built environment and air quality management); 4. Energy efficient, low/zero carbon, and green buildings/communities; 5. Climate change mitigation and adaptation in urban environments; 6. Green infrastructure and BMPs; 7. Environmental Footprint accounting and management; 8. Urban agriculture and forestry; 9. ICT, smart grid and intelligent infrastructure; 10. Urban design/planning, regulations, legislation, certification, economics, and policy; 11. Social aspects, impacts and resiliency of cities; 12. Behavior monitoring, analysis and change within urban communities; 13. Health monitoring and improvement; 14. Nexus issues related to sustainable cities and societies; 15. Smart city governance; 16. Decision Support Systems for trade-off and uncertainty analysis for improved management of cities and society; 17. Big data, machine learning, and artificial intelligence applications and case studies; 18. Critical infrastructure protection, including security, privacy, forensics, and reliability issues of cyber-physical systems. 19. Water footprint reduction and urban water distribution, harvesting, treatment, reuse and management; 20. Waste reduction and recycling; 21. Wastewater collection, treatment and recycling; 22. Smart, clean and healthy transportation systems and infrastructure;
期刊最新文献
A systematic review of outdoor thermal comfort research: Integrating climate zones, population groups, and methodological frameworks Coupling effect of urban building clusters and crosswinds on the aerodynamic performance of high-speed maglev trains Multi-objective optimization of urban residential morphology in cold regions based on energy consumption reduction and solar radiation utilization potential enhancement Adding bike simulation capacity to an activity–based travel demand model and testing policy scenarios Incorporating water-energy-carbon constraints into the optimization of urban refined land use: A case study of Zhengzhou, China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1