Juan Luo , Rui Dang , Pucheng Lan , Yiming Hu , Boyu Yang
{"title":"Urban-rural disparities in low-carbon policy intensity and residents' willingness to pay in environmental sustainability","authors":"Juan Luo , Rui Dang , Pucheng Lan , Yiming Hu , Boyu Yang","doi":"10.1016/j.cities.2025.105795","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Low-carbon policies can shape individual environmental behaviors, yet how policy intensity influences willingness to pay (WTP) for environmental protection, across diverse socioeconomic and geographic contexts, remains poorly understood. Drawing on a nationwide survey in China (<em>N</em> = 22,012), we find a U-shaped relationship between the intensity of low-carbon policies and residents' WTP. This nonlinearity differs markedly between urban and rural populations: rural residents display a steeper U-shaped response, while for urban residents, higher socioeconomic status (SES) transforms the U-shaped curve into a positive linear gradient. Spatial analyses (Global and Local Moran's I) reveal pronounced clustering, with high WTP concentrated in ecologically dependent, less-urbanized regions and low WTP in more urbanized regions, including Beijing and its surroundings. These findings underscore the complexity of policy impacts across social and spatial dimensions, offering insights into how tailored, context-sensitive strategies may enhance public engagement and foster more equitable pathways to sustainable development.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48405,"journal":{"name":"Cities","volume":"159 ","pages":"Article 105795"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cities","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264275125000952","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"URBAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Low-carbon policies can shape individual environmental behaviors, yet how policy intensity influences willingness to pay (WTP) for environmental protection, across diverse socioeconomic and geographic contexts, remains poorly understood. Drawing on a nationwide survey in China (N = 22,012), we find a U-shaped relationship between the intensity of low-carbon policies and residents' WTP. This nonlinearity differs markedly between urban and rural populations: rural residents display a steeper U-shaped response, while for urban residents, higher socioeconomic status (SES) transforms the U-shaped curve into a positive linear gradient. Spatial analyses (Global and Local Moran's I) reveal pronounced clustering, with high WTP concentrated in ecologically dependent, less-urbanized regions and low WTP in more urbanized regions, including Beijing and its surroundings. These findings underscore the complexity of policy impacts across social and spatial dimensions, offering insights into how tailored, context-sensitive strategies may enhance public engagement and foster more equitable pathways to sustainable development.
低碳政策可以塑造个人的环境行为,但在不同的社会经济和地理背景下,政策强度如何影响环境保护的支付意愿(WTP)仍然知之甚少。通过对中国的一项全国性调查(N = 22,012),我们发现低碳政策强度与居民WTP之间呈u型关系。这种非线性在城市和农村人口之间存在显著差异:农村居民表现出更陡峭的u型响应,而对于城市居民来说,较高的社会经济地位(SES)将u型曲线转变为正线性梯度。空间分析(Global and Local Moran’s I)显示出明显的聚类特征,高WTP集中在生态依赖、城市化程度较低的地区,而低WTP集中在城市化程度较高的地区,包括北京及其周边地区。这些发现强调了政策影响在社会和空间维度上的复杂性,为我们提供了有针对性的、因地制宜的战略如何加强公众参与和促进更公平的可持续发展之路的见解。
期刊介绍:
Cities offers a comprehensive range of articles on all aspects of urban policy. It provides an international and interdisciplinary platform for the exchange of ideas and information between urban planners and policy makers from national and local government, non-government organizations, academia and consultancy. The primary aims of the journal are to analyse and assess past and present urban development and management as a reflection of effective, ineffective and non-existent planning policies; and the promotion of the implementation of appropriate urban policies in both the developed and the developing world.