Coyotes Hunt Harbor Seal Pups on the California Coast

IF 4.4 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY Ecology Pub Date : 2025-02-12 DOI:10.1002/ecy.70031
Francis D. Gerraty, Sarah Grimes, Sue Pemberton, Sarah G. Allen, Sarah A. Codde
{"title":"Coyotes Hunt Harbor Seal Pups on the California Coast","authors":"Francis D. Gerraty,&nbsp;Sarah Grimes,&nbsp;Sue Pemberton,&nbsp;Sarah G. Allen,&nbsp;Sarah A. Codde","doi":"10.1002/ecy.70031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Terrestrial carnivores hunt marine mammals along many coastlines around the world, yet the dynamics of these predator–prey relationships are rarely well characterized (Griffin et al., <span>2023</span>; Stander, <span>2019</span>; Way &amp; Horton, <span>2004</span>). Among marine mammals, pinnipeds (i.e., seals and sea lions) may be particularly vulnerable to land-based predators when they aggregate onshore to rest, give birth, nurse, breed, molt, avoid marine predators, and thermoregulate (Catenazzi &amp; Donnelly, <span>2008</span>; Nordstrom, <span>2002</span>). Many pinniped species exhibit strong site fidelity, so rookery beaches where birthing and breeding take place can generate spatially and temporally predictable prey aggregations for terrestrial predators. These aggregations of large and calorically rich prey can serve as a substantial food source that may lead to shifts in predator behavior, abundance, and species interactions (Roffler et al., <span>2023</span>; Skinner et al., <span>1995</span>).</p><p>During routine harbor seal (<i>Phoca vitulina</i>) population monitoring at a small mainland rookery site at MacKerricher State Beach (Mendocino County, California) during the March–June pupping seasons in 2016 and 2017, we noticed a surprising trend in harbor seal pup mortality. In each year, three harbor seal pups were found in dune vegetation above the high tide line adjacent to the rookery, showing numerous signs of predation-driven mortality, including marks in the sand indicative of a struggle, drag marks from the lower intertidal to the dune area, massive hemorrhaging in the head and neck region, and skull punctures (Figure 1). This characteristic pattern of pup mortality increased in frequency in 2018 and 2019, when 11 and 12 pups were respectively found showing similar signs of predation. In most cases, pup carcasses were found within an approximately 25-m<sup>2</sup> area of dune vegetation, with skulls disarticulated from the rest of the body at the C1 vertebra, and skulls were missing on several occasions. This unusual pup mortality pattern has been documented at the MacKerricher rookery site every year since 2016—including four cases in 2024—for a total of 55 suspected predation events (Figure 2; Appendix S1: Table S1).</p><p>Across dozens of kill site investigations and harbor seal pup necropsies from 2016 to 2022, we strongly suspected that coyotes were responsible for most or all the predation events due to the presence of canid tracks adjacent to kill sites and drag marks, the presence of coyote scat near seal carcasses, and puncture wounds to the skull and neck consistent with canid predation. To confirm that coyotes were hunting harbor seal pups at the MacKerricher State Beach rookery, we placed one to two motion-triggered camera traps (Browning Strike Force HD Pro X) in April–May 2023 (16 trap-nights) and two to four camera traps in April–May 2024 (48 trap-nights) to document pup predation events. Cameras were mounted to driftwood and programmed to take 20 or 60-s videos when triggered, with a 30-s “quiet period” following video capture before another video could be triggered. Throughout 64 trap-nights (32 nights total), we documented three instances of individual coyotes dragging harbor seal pups into dune vegetation, opening carcasses through the head and neck region, feeding, and removing skulls (Video S1). These events occurred in the evening and early morning hours, between 23:00 and 5:00. Necropsies and kill site investigations conducted the morning following each of these predation events revealed drag marks in the sand, massive hemorrhaging in the neck region, skull punctures, and skull disarticulation from the body consistent with prior events of suspected predation (Figure 1). These lines of corroborating evidence suggest that the harbor seal pups documented on camera were killed by coyotes rather than scavenged, and the consistency of these predation events with over 50 pup carcasses showing similar mortality patterns in 2016–2024 is suggestive that coyotes regularly hunt seal pups in this locality (Figure 2; Appendix S1: Table S1).</p><p>We estimated the standard length of harbor seal pups during field necropsies, as direct measurement was often impossible due to skull removal by coyotes. The mean estimated length of coyote-killed seals was 80.57 ± 0.89 cm (SE; <i>n</i> = 54), indicating that most were less than two weeks old and had an estimated body mass of 13–15 kg (Cottrell et al., <span>2002</span>). For comparison, coyotes in the western United States typically have a body mass between 10 and 14 kg, making each harbor seal pup a substantial food source (Hinton et al., <span>2019</span>). The seasonality of coyote predation events reflects this trend of coyotes primarily killing young and small harbor seal pups, with 70.9% of predation events occurring within the first 20 days of the pupping season at the MacKerricher rookery (April 14 to May 4; Figure 2A). High rates of coyote predation on small seal pups could indicate that coyotes target this age class or that seal pups become less vulnerable to predation as they age due to increases in body size, vigilance, or escape ability. In addition, coyotes at MacKerricher State Park appear to first remove harbor seal pup skulls and consume brain tissue, potentially because the brain tissue is highly nutritious, easily accessible, and/or can be easily carried to the den for later consumption or for feeding coyote pups. Our cameras documented coyotes returning to seal pup carcasses to scavenge on subsequent evenings, along with other coastal scavengers exploiting the coyote-killed pinniped carrion including Bald Eagles (<i>Haliaeetus leucocephalus</i>), Turkey Vultures (<i>Cathartes aura</i>), Common Ravens (<i>Corvus corax</i>), gulls (<i>Larus</i> spp.), and rodents.</p><p>Lastly, to assess whether harbor seal pup predation by coyotes occurs across a larger geographic scale on the California coast, we also gathered observations of coyote–seal interactions from seal rookery monitors, naturalists, and wildlife photographers through word-of-mouth networking. From these contributors, we received documentation of four independent direct observations of coyotes successfully hunting harbor seal pups at two rookery sites in Marin County (Drakes Estero and Bolinas Lagoon; Appendix S1: Table S1, Observations 32, 37, 40, and 50). In each of these instances, observers watched one or two coyotes ambushing hauled-out harbor seals at the edge of exposed intertidal sandbars within coastal lagoons (Figure 3). In all cases, the hunting coyote(s) charged at large aggregations of harbor seal adults and pups, causing seals to flush into the water to escape predation. Coyotes captured seal pups onshore or, in one instance, in shallow water, killing them with bites to the neck.</p><p>Coyotes are abundant in California's coastal ecosystems and are known to consume a diverse array of marine resources including seabirds, intertidal invertebrates, fishes, and beach-cast pinniped carrion (Reid et al., <span>2018</span>; Rose &amp; Polis, <span>1998</span>; Zilz et al., <span>2023</span>). While coyote acquisition of marine resources occurs primarily via scavenging, coyotes have been documented hunting marine mammals in other regions including a sea otter in Alaska (Monnett &amp; Siniff, <span>1986</span>) and a harp seal in Massachusetts (Way &amp; Horton, <span>2004</span>). In addition, coyote predation was acknowledged as a source of harbor seal pup mortality in Washington by Steiger et al. (<span>1989</span>). However, aside from the observations and data presented herein, evidence and detailed descriptions of serial pinniped predation by coyotes remain limited.</p><p>Pinnipeds are among the largest and most nutritionally valuable parcels of organic matter available to predators in coastal ecosystems (Quaggiotto et al., <span>2018</span>). Pinniped rookeries, which exhibit predictable aggregations of high-value prey, can consequently serve as important sites of marine-to-terrestrial nutrient subsidies to land-based pinniped predators (Catenazzi &amp; Donnelly, <span>2008</span>; Stander, <span>2019</span>). Along the California coast, pinnipeds can constitute over 20% of the diet of coyotes in areas adjacent to rookeries (Reid et al., <span>2018</span>). Rookery-associated marine subsidies may, in turn, drive behavioral and numerical responses in coastal coyote populations (Rose &amp; Polis, <span>1998</span>). Future efforts to quantify the ecological consequences of pinniped subsidies to coastal coyotes should assess whether pinniped predation modifies coyote space use, behavior, health, abundance, and interspecific interactions.</p><p>Coyote predation may also lead to changes in seal behavior and space use in order to reduce predation risk. Harbor seals abandon haul-outs when they detect terrestrial predators, and the selection of isolated haul-out sites may serve as a behavioral adaptation to avoid predation by terrestrial consumers (Nordstrom, <span>2002</span>; Figure 3). Actual or perceived risk of coyote predation may drive harbor seal distributional shifts away from rookeries with predator access, including the mainland sandy beach rookery at MacKerricher State Park. Overall harbor seal abundance has declined at the MacKerricher rookery since 2018, and we have also noticed that the distribution of hauled-out harbor seals within the rookery has shifted away from the mainland sandy beach onto adjacent rocky intertidal outcroppings that are only connected to the mainland during low tide (Appendix S1: Figure S1). It is possible that between- and within-rookery shifts in harbor seal space use have emerged as a behavioral response to the risk of coyote predation, but these associations between seal redistribution and coyote predation remain anecdotal and do not appear to have limited pup predation.</p><p>Harbor seals have used the MacKerricher rookery for decades, so the observed increase in coyote predation on seal pups since 2016 may reflect improved documentation rather than a true rise in predation rates. The rookery monitoring program has focused on counting adult and juvenile seals within the rookery since 2007, while coyotes tend to drag carcasses away from the rookery into nearby vegetation, thereby making predation events less noticeable. Since 2016, enhanced attention to mortality patterns by rookery monitors has likely contributed to better recognition of these events. However, changes in coyote behavior, abundance, alternative prey availability, or other ecological factors could also have led to a genuine increase in predation rates.</p><p>Our observations and data indicate that coyotes are an ambush predator of harbor seal pups in multiple regions along the California coast, including one mainland rookery in which coyotes regularly hunt seals during the pupping season. Due to their large body size and predictable availability, harbor seal pups can serve as a substantial food source for coyote predators that may generate cascading ecological effects in terrestrial ecosystems. Coyote predation may also lead to shifts in seal behavior and haul-out site selection to reduce predation risk. Consequently, coyote predation of harbor seal pups can link the dynamics of marine and terrestrial ecosystems, highlighting the need for future research to uncover the ecological consequences of this previously undescribed predator–prey interaction.</p><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest.</p>","PeriodicalId":11484,"journal":{"name":"Ecology","volume":"106 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ecy.70031","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ecy.70031","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Terrestrial carnivores hunt marine mammals along many coastlines around the world, yet the dynamics of these predator–prey relationships are rarely well characterized (Griffin et al., 2023; Stander, 2019; Way & Horton, 2004). Among marine mammals, pinnipeds (i.e., seals and sea lions) may be particularly vulnerable to land-based predators when they aggregate onshore to rest, give birth, nurse, breed, molt, avoid marine predators, and thermoregulate (Catenazzi & Donnelly, 2008; Nordstrom, 2002). Many pinniped species exhibit strong site fidelity, so rookery beaches where birthing and breeding take place can generate spatially and temporally predictable prey aggregations for terrestrial predators. These aggregations of large and calorically rich prey can serve as a substantial food source that may lead to shifts in predator behavior, abundance, and species interactions (Roffler et al., 2023; Skinner et al., 1995).

During routine harbor seal (Phoca vitulina) population monitoring at a small mainland rookery site at MacKerricher State Beach (Mendocino County, California) during the March–June pupping seasons in 2016 and 2017, we noticed a surprising trend in harbor seal pup mortality. In each year, three harbor seal pups were found in dune vegetation above the high tide line adjacent to the rookery, showing numerous signs of predation-driven mortality, including marks in the sand indicative of a struggle, drag marks from the lower intertidal to the dune area, massive hemorrhaging in the head and neck region, and skull punctures (Figure 1). This characteristic pattern of pup mortality increased in frequency in 2018 and 2019, when 11 and 12 pups were respectively found showing similar signs of predation. In most cases, pup carcasses were found within an approximately 25-m2 area of dune vegetation, with skulls disarticulated from the rest of the body at the C1 vertebra, and skulls were missing on several occasions. This unusual pup mortality pattern has been documented at the MacKerricher rookery site every year since 2016—including four cases in 2024—for a total of 55 suspected predation events (Figure 2; Appendix S1: Table S1).

Across dozens of kill site investigations and harbor seal pup necropsies from 2016 to 2022, we strongly suspected that coyotes were responsible for most or all the predation events due to the presence of canid tracks adjacent to kill sites and drag marks, the presence of coyote scat near seal carcasses, and puncture wounds to the skull and neck consistent with canid predation. To confirm that coyotes were hunting harbor seal pups at the MacKerricher State Beach rookery, we placed one to two motion-triggered camera traps (Browning Strike Force HD Pro X) in April–May 2023 (16 trap-nights) and two to four camera traps in April–May 2024 (48 trap-nights) to document pup predation events. Cameras were mounted to driftwood and programmed to take 20 or 60-s videos when triggered, with a 30-s “quiet period” following video capture before another video could be triggered. Throughout 64 trap-nights (32 nights total), we documented three instances of individual coyotes dragging harbor seal pups into dune vegetation, opening carcasses through the head and neck region, feeding, and removing skulls (Video S1). These events occurred in the evening and early morning hours, between 23:00 and 5:00. Necropsies and kill site investigations conducted the morning following each of these predation events revealed drag marks in the sand, massive hemorrhaging in the neck region, skull punctures, and skull disarticulation from the body consistent with prior events of suspected predation (Figure 1). These lines of corroborating evidence suggest that the harbor seal pups documented on camera were killed by coyotes rather than scavenged, and the consistency of these predation events with over 50 pup carcasses showing similar mortality patterns in 2016–2024 is suggestive that coyotes regularly hunt seal pups in this locality (Figure 2; Appendix S1: Table S1).

We estimated the standard length of harbor seal pups during field necropsies, as direct measurement was often impossible due to skull removal by coyotes. The mean estimated length of coyote-killed seals was 80.57 ± 0.89 cm (SE; n = 54), indicating that most were less than two weeks old and had an estimated body mass of 13–15 kg (Cottrell et al., 2002). For comparison, coyotes in the western United States typically have a body mass between 10 and 14 kg, making each harbor seal pup a substantial food source (Hinton et al., 2019). The seasonality of coyote predation events reflects this trend of coyotes primarily killing young and small harbor seal pups, with 70.9% of predation events occurring within the first 20 days of the pupping season at the MacKerricher rookery (April 14 to May 4; Figure 2A). High rates of coyote predation on small seal pups could indicate that coyotes target this age class or that seal pups become less vulnerable to predation as they age due to increases in body size, vigilance, or escape ability. In addition, coyotes at MacKerricher State Park appear to first remove harbor seal pup skulls and consume brain tissue, potentially because the brain tissue is highly nutritious, easily accessible, and/or can be easily carried to the den for later consumption or for feeding coyote pups. Our cameras documented coyotes returning to seal pup carcasses to scavenge on subsequent evenings, along with other coastal scavengers exploiting the coyote-killed pinniped carrion including Bald Eagles (Haliaeetus leucocephalus), Turkey Vultures (Cathartes aura), Common Ravens (Corvus corax), gulls (Larus spp.), and rodents.

Lastly, to assess whether harbor seal pup predation by coyotes occurs across a larger geographic scale on the California coast, we also gathered observations of coyote–seal interactions from seal rookery monitors, naturalists, and wildlife photographers through word-of-mouth networking. From these contributors, we received documentation of four independent direct observations of coyotes successfully hunting harbor seal pups at two rookery sites in Marin County (Drakes Estero and Bolinas Lagoon; Appendix S1: Table S1, Observations 32, 37, 40, and 50). In each of these instances, observers watched one or two coyotes ambushing hauled-out harbor seals at the edge of exposed intertidal sandbars within coastal lagoons (Figure 3). In all cases, the hunting coyote(s) charged at large aggregations of harbor seal adults and pups, causing seals to flush into the water to escape predation. Coyotes captured seal pups onshore or, in one instance, in shallow water, killing them with bites to the neck.

Coyotes are abundant in California's coastal ecosystems and are known to consume a diverse array of marine resources including seabirds, intertidal invertebrates, fishes, and beach-cast pinniped carrion (Reid et al., 2018; Rose & Polis, 1998; Zilz et al., 2023). While coyote acquisition of marine resources occurs primarily via scavenging, coyotes have been documented hunting marine mammals in other regions including a sea otter in Alaska (Monnett & Siniff, 1986) and a harp seal in Massachusetts (Way & Horton, 2004). In addition, coyote predation was acknowledged as a source of harbor seal pup mortality in Washington by Steiger et al. (1989). However, aside from the observations and data presented herein, evidence and detailed descriptions of serial pinniped predation by coyotes remain limited.

Pinnipeds are among the largest and most nutritionally valuable parcels of organic matter available to predators in coastal ecosystems (Quaggiotto et al., 2018). Pinniped rookeries, which exhibit predictable aggregations of high-value prey, can consequently serve as important sites of marine-to-terrestrial nutrient subsidies to land-based pinniped predators (Catenazzi & Donnelly, 2008; Stander, 2019). Along the California coast, pinnipeds can constitute over 20% of the diet of coyotes in areas adjacent to rookeries (Reid et al., 2018). Rookery-associated marine subsidies may, in turn, drive behavioral and numerical responses in coastal coyote populations (Rose & Polis, 1998). Future efforts to quantify the ecological consequences of pinniped subsidies to coastal coyotes should assess whether pinniped predation modifies coyote space use, behavior, health, abundance, and interspecific interactions.

Coyote predation may also lead to changes in seal behavior and space use in order to reduce predation risk. Harbor seals abandon haul-outs when they detect terrestrial predators, and the selection of isolated haul-out sites may serve as a behavioral adaptation to avoid predation by terrestrial consumers (Nordstrom, 2002; Figure 3). Actual or perceived risk of coyote predation may drive harbor seal distributional shifts away from rookeries with predator access, including the mainland sandy beach rookery at MacKerricher State Park. Overall harbor seal abundance has declined at the MacKerricher rookery since 2018, and we have also noticed that the distribution of hauled-out harbor seals within the rookery has shifted away from the mainland sandy beach onto adjacent rocky intertidal outcroppings that are only connected to the mainland during low tide (Appendix S1: Figure S1). It is possible that between- and within-rookery shifts in harbor seal space use have emerged as a behavioral response to the risk of coyote predation, but these associations between seal redistribution and coyote predation remain anecdotal and do not appear to have limited pup predation.

Harbor seals have used the MacKerricher rookery for decades, so the observed increase in coyote predation on seal pups since 2016 may reflect improved documentation rather than a true rise in predation rates. The rookery monitoring program has focused on counting adult and juvenile seals within the rookery since 2007, while coyotes tend to drag carcasses away from the rookery into nearby vegetation, thereby making predation events less noticeable. Since 2016, enhanced attention to mortality patterns by rookery monitors has likely contributed to better recognition of these events. However, changes in coyote behavior, abundance, alternative prey availability, or other ecological factors could also have led to a genuine increase in predation rates.

Our observations and data indicate that coyotes are an ambush predator of harbor seal pups in multiple regions along the California coast, including one mainland rookery in which coyotes regularly hunt seals during the pupping season. Due to their large body size and predictable availability, harbor seal pups can serve as a substantial food source for coyote predators that may generate cascading ecological effects in terrestrial ecosystems. Coyote predation may also lead to shifts in seal behavior and haul-out site selection to reduce predation risk. Consequently, coyote predation of harbor seal pups can link the dynamics of marine and terrestrial ecosystems, highlighting the need for future research to uncover the ecological consequences of this previously undescribed predator–prey interaction.

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ecology
Ecology 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
2.10%
发文量
332
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Ecology publishes articles that report on the basic elements of ecological research. Emphasis is placed on concise, clear articles documenting important ecological phenomena. The journal publishes a broad array of research that includes a rapidly expanding envelope of subject matter, techniques, approaches, and concepts: paleoecology through present-day phenomena; evolutionary, population, physiological, community, and ecosystem ecology, as well as biogeochemistry; inclusive of descriptive, comparative, experimental, mathematical, statistical, and interdisciplinary approaches.
期刊最新文献
Predicting landscape-scale native bumble bee habitat use over space, time, and forage availability Idiosyncratic responses to biotic and environmental filters in wood-inhabiting fungal communities Coyotes Hunt Harbor Seal Pups on the California Coast Climate-induced range expansion of cushion plants promotes functional homogenization of soil nematode communities Interactive effects of leaf pathogens and plant mycorrhizal type on plant diversity–productivity relationships
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1