William Brinton, Bruno Basso, Neville Millar, Kris Covey, Charles Bettigo, Sindhu Jagadamma, Frank Loeffler
{"title":"An inter-laboratory comparison of soil organic carbon analysis on a farm with four agricultural management systems","authors":"William Brinton, Bruno Basso, Neville Millar, Kris Covey, Charles Bettigo, Sindhu Jagadamma, Frank Loeffler","doi":"10.1002/agj2.70018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Soil organic carbon (SOC) as a key soil health indicator is integral to the soil's capacity to function as a vital living ecosystem that sustains plants, animals, and humans. Accurate SOC estimation is essential to decision-making for an increasing number of stakeholders, such as farmers, industry professionals, and policymakers, to determine the environmental benefit of agricultural practices, and more recently, allocate financial rewards through carbon market initiatives. Our study examined SOC variability in soils from four different regenerative management systems on a single farm using stratification and sample compositing, and analyzed by four different laboratories using dry combustion, the recommended analytical method, but one which varied according to laboratory standard operating procedures (SOP). Results showed significant variation in SOC levels for the same soil samples at different laboratories (1.6 ± 0.2 g kg<sup>−1</sup>), variation comparable to that between the distinct management systems (1.5 ± 0.4 g kg<sup>−1</sup>). Our findings show that analytical variability within and between laboratories must be considered, that use of the same laboratory, and to the extent possible the same SOP for successive SOC measurements at the same location is necessary, and that rigorous stratification alongside minimal sample consolidation should be conducted to generate analytical sample numbers that cater to logistics, economics, and scientific rigor.</p>","PeriodicalId":7522,"journal":{"name":"Agronomy Journal","volume":"117 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/agj2.70018","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agronomy Journal","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/agj2.70018","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Soil organic carbon (SOC) as a key soil health indicator is integral to the soil's capacity to function as a vital living ecosystem that sustains plants, animals, and humans. Accurate SOC estimation is essential to decision-making for an increasing number of stakeholders, such as farmers, industry professionals, and policymakers, to determine the environmental benefit of agricultural practices, and more recently, allocate financial rewards through carbon market initiatives. Our study examined SOC variability in soils from four different regenerative management systems on a single farm using stratification and sample compositing, and analyzed by four different laboratories using dry combustion, the recommended analytical method, but one which varied according to laboratory standard operating procedures (SOP). Results showed significant variation in SOC levels for the same soil samples at different laboratories (1.6 ± 0.2 g kg−1), variation comparable to that between the distinct management systems (1.5 ± 0.4 g kg−1). Our findings show that analytical variability within and between laboratories must be considered, that use of the same laboratory, and to the extent possible the same SOP for successive SOC measurements at the same location is necessary, and that rigorous stratification alongside minimal sample consolidation should be conducted to generate analytical sample numbers that cater to logistics, economics, and scientific rigor.
期刊介绍:
After critical review and approval by the editorial board, AJ publishes articles reporting research findings in soil–plant relationships; crop science; soil science; biometry; crop, soil, pasture, and range management; crop, forage, and pasture production and utilization; turfgrass; agroclimatology; agronomic models; integrated pest management; integrated agricultural systems; and various aspects of entomology, weed science, animal science, plant pathology, and agricultural economics as applied to production agriculture.
Notes are published about apparatus, observations, and experimental techniques. Observations usually are limited to studies and reports of unrepeatable phenomena or other unique circumstances. Review and interpretation papers are also published, subject to standard review. Contributions to the Forum section deal with current agronomic issues and questions in brief, thought-provoking form. Such papers are reviewed by the editor in consultation with the editorial board.