Maranda Sullivan, Kajal Angras, Victoria Boyd, Amanda J Young, A Dhanya Mackeen, Michael J Paglia
{"title":"Intrapartum Glycemic Control with Insulin Infusion versus Rotating Fluids: A Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Maranda Sullivan, Kajal Angras, Victoria Boyd, Amanda J Young, A Dhanya Mackeen, Michael J Paglia","doi":"10.1055/a-2510-4906","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong> This study aimed to evaluate rotating intravenous (IV) fluids compared with insulin infusion for maternal intrapartum glycemic control of neonatal blood glucose within 2 hours of birth.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong> This randomized controlled trial compared the use of rotating IV fluids to continuous insulin infusion for intrapartum glycemic control for patients with type II diabetes mellitus (DM) or medication-controlled gestational diabetes (A2GDM). A sample size of 74 participants was studied to detect a 10-mg/dL difference in neonatal blood glucose within 2 hours of birth between the groups with a standard deviation of 15, 80% power, and α 0.05. Secondary neonatal outcomes included neonatal blood glucose within 24 hours after birth, Apgar < 7 at 5 minutes, and a composite including neonatal hypoglycemia, NICU admission, hyperbilirubinemia, and respiratory distress syndrome. Secondary maternal outcomes included intrapartum hypoglycemia, blood glucose immediately prior to delivery, mode of delivery, and postpartum complications. Both intention-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol (PP) analyses were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> A total of 114 patients were randomized, 57 in each arm. For the PP analysis, 51 patients were analyzed in the rotating IV fluids arm and 32 patients in the insulin infusion arm. There was no significant difference in neonatal blood glucose within 2 hours of birth when rotating IV fluids were used (ITT: 54.5 mg/dL [IQR: 42.5, 72.5], PP: 56.0 mg/dL [IQR: 42.0, 76.0]) when compared with an insulin infusion (ITT: 59.0 mg/dL [IQR: 41.0, 69.0], PP: 62.5 mg/dL [IQR: 44.5, 68.5], <i>p</i> = 0.89 [ITT] and <i>p</i> = 0.68 [PP]). No significant differences were noted in secondary outcomes. The median intrapartum maternal blood glucose was 98.5 mg/dL (IQR: 90.5, 105.0) in the rotating fluids arm and 96.3 mg/dL (IQR: 90.0, 108.5) in the insulin infusion arm (<i>p</i> = 0.96), and the rate of neonatal hypoglycemia was 11.8 versus 15.6%, respectively (<i>p</i> = 0.61) in the PP analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> There was no difference in neonatal blood glucose within 2 hours of birth when rotating IV fluids were used for intrapartum glycemic control compared with a continuous insulin infusion.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>· There is no optimal option for maternal glycemic control in labor.. · Maternal glycemic control was comparable in the two study arms.. · There was no difference in neonatal blood glucose between study arms..</p>","PeriodicalId":7584,"journal":{"name":"American journal of perinatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of perinatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2510-4906","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to evaluate rotating intravenous (IV) fluids compared with insulin infusion for maternal intrapartum glycemic control of neonatal blood glucose within 2 hours of birth.
Study design: This randomized controlled trial compared the use of rotating IV fluids to continuous insulin infusion for intrapartum glycemic control for patients with type II diabetes mellitus (DM) or medication-controlled gestational diabetes (A2GDM). A sample size of 74 participants was studied to detect a 10-mg/dL difference in neonatal blood glucose within 2 hours of birth between the groups with a standard deviation of 15, 80% power, and α 0.05. Secondary neonatal outcomes included neonatal blood glucose within 24 hours after birth, Apgar < 7 at 5 minutes, and a composite including neonatal hypoglycemia, NICU admission, hyperbilirubinemia, and respiratory distress syndrome. Secondary maternal outcomes included intrapartum hypoglycemia, blood glucose immediately prior to delivery, mode of delivery, and postpartum complications. Both intention-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol (PP) analyses were performed.
Results: A total of 114 patients were randomized, 57 in each arm. For the PP analysis, 51 patients were analyzed in the rotating IV fluids arm and 32 patients in the insulin infusion arm. There was no significant difference in neonatal blood glucose within 2 hours of birth when rotating IV fluids were used (ITT: 54.5 mg/dL [IQR: 42.5, 72.5], PP: 56.0 mg/dL [IQR: 42.0, 76.0]) when compared with an insulin infusion (ITT: 59.0 mg/dL [IQR: 41.0, 69.0], PP: 62.5 mg/dL [IQR: 44.5, 68.5], p = 0.89 [ITT] and p = 0.68 [PP]). No significant differences were noted in secondary outcomes. The median intrapartum maternal blood glucose was 98.5 mg/dL (IQR: 90.5, 105.0) in the rotating fluids arm and 96.3 mg/dL (IQR: 90.0, 108.5) in the insulin infusion arm (p = 0.96), and the rate of neonatal hypoglycemia was 11.8 versus 15.6%, respectively (p = 0.61) in the PP analysis.
Conclusion: There was no difference in neonatal blood glucose within 2 hours of birth when rotating IV fluids were used for intrapartum glycemic control compared with a continuous insulin infusion.
Key points: · There is no optimal option for maternal glycemic control in labor.. · Maternal glycemic control was comparable in the two study arms.. · There was no difference in neonatal blood glucose between study arms..
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Perinatology is an international, peer-reviewed, and indexed journal publishing 14 issues a year dealing with original research and topical reviews. It is the definitive forum for specialists in obstetrics, neonatology, perinatology, and maternal/fetal medicine, with emphasis on bridging the different fields.
The focus is primarily on clinical and translational research, clinical and technical advances in diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment as well as evidence-based reviews. Topics of interest include epidemiology, diagnosis, prevention, and management of maternal, fetal, and neonatal diseases. Manuscripts on new technology, NICU set-ups, and nursing topics are published to provide a broad survey of important issues in this field.
All articles undergo rigorous peer review, with web-based submission, expedited turn-around, and availability of electronic publication.
The American Journal of Perinatology is accompanied by AJP Reports - an Open Access journal for case reports in neonatology and maternal/fetal medicine.