Retrospective Study to Compare Outcomes in 159 Patients Undergoing First Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation for Myeloma Treated with Melphalan 140 mg/m² or 200 mg/m².

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Annals of Transplantation Pub Date : 2025-02-11 DOI:10.12659/AOT.947186
Umut Yılmaz, Şükran Erdem Nurcan, Deniz Özmen, Ayşe Salihoğlu, Ahmet Emre Eşkazan, Şeniz Öngören, Zafer Başlar, Teoman Soysal, Muhlis Cem Ar, Tuğrul Elverdi
{"title":"Retrospective Study to Compare Outcomes in 159 Patients Undergoing First Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation for Myeloma Treated with Melphalan 140 mg/m² or 200 mg/m².","authors":"Umut Yılmaz, Şükran Erdem Nurcan, Deniz Özmen, Ayşe Salihoğlu, Ahmet Emre Eşkazan, Şeniz Öngören, Zafer Başlar, Teoman Soysal, Muhlis Cem Ar, Tuğrul Elverdi","doi":"10.12659/AOT.947186","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BACKGROUND The standard conditioning regimen for autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in multiple myeloma (MM) is 200 mg/m² of melphalan (Mel200). Dosing is reduced by 30% (Mel140) in frail patients. Studies comparing the performance of these regimens report inconsistent findings, mainly confounded by non-consecutive patient inclusion, missing data, and heterogenous practices. The largest study reported an increased risk of death with Mel200 among patients with very good partial remission, or better, before ASCT. This retrospective study from a single center compared outcomes of patients with a first ASCT for myeloma treated with melphalan 140 mg/m² or 200 mg/m². MATERIAL AND METHODS This was a retrospective real-world analysis from a single center. Data from 159 consecutive, first, single ASCTs for MM between 2012 and 2021 were included. Mel200 and Mel140 were administered to 131 and 28 patients, respectively. Primary and secondary objectives were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), respectively. RESULTS Median follow-up was 5.8 years. Over 90% received bortezomib-based induction, and over 76% achieved at least very good partial remission (VGPR) before ASCT in either group. PFS estimates were similar between groups (P=0.49). OS was longer with Mel200 (HR=0.42, P=0.002). Mel200 maintained OS superiority in all relevant subgroups. CONCLUSIONS In a homogenous population of patients with MM, Mel200 was associated with longer OS, likely reflecting the physiological state of patients and tolerance to subsequent treatments. Concerns reported from EBMT data regarding the association of Mel200 with mortality among patients with VGPR or better before ASCT are not supported by this study's findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":7935,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Transplantation","volume":"30 ","pages":"e947186"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11829485/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12659/AOT.947186","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND The standard conditioning regimen for autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in multiple myeloma (MM) is 200 mg/m² of melphalan (Mel200). Dosing is reduced by 30% (Mel140) in frail patients. Studies comparing the performance of these regimens report inconsistent findings, mainly confounded by non-consecutive patient inclusion, missing data, and heterogenous practices. The largest study reported an increased risk of death with Mel200 among patients with very good partial remission, or better, before ASCT. This retrospective study from a single center compared outcomes of patients with a first ASCT for myeloma treated with melphalan 140 mg/m² or 200 mg/m². MATERIAL AND METHODS This was a retrospective real-world analysis from a single center. Data from 159 consecutive, first, single ASCTs for MM between 2012 and 2021 were included. Mel200 and Mel140 were administered to 131 and 28 patients, respectively. Primary and secondary objectives were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), respectively. RESULTS Median follow-up was 5.8 years. Over 90% received bortezomib-based induction, and over 76% achieved at least very good partial remission (VGPR) before ASCT in either group. PFS estimates were similar between groups (P=0.49). OS was longer with Mel200 (HR=0.42, P=0.002). Mel200 maintained OS superiority in all relevant subgroups. CONCLUSIONS In a homogenous population of patients with MM, Mel200 was associated with longer OS, likely reflecting the physiological state of patients and tolerance to subsequent treatments. Concerns reported from EBMT data regarding the association of Mel200 with mortality among patients with VGPR or better before ASCT are not supported by this study's findings.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
背景多发性骨髓瘤(MM)自体干细胞移植(ASCT)的标准治疗方案为200毫克/平方米美法仑(Mel200)。体弱患者的剂量可减少30%(Mel140)。比较这些治疗方案效果的研究报告结果并不一致,主要是受到非连续纳入患者、数据缺失和不同治疗方法的影响。最大的一项研究报告称,在 ASCT 前部分缓解非常好或更好的患者中,使用 Mel200 会增加死亡风险。这项来自单一中心的回顾性研究比较了首次接受 ASCT 的骨髓瘤患者接受美法仑 140 mg/m² 或 200 mg/m² 治疗的结果。材料与方法 这是一项来自单一中心的回顾性真实世界分析。研究纳入了 2012 年至 2021 年间 159 例连续、首次、单次 ASCT 治疗 MM 的数据。Mel200和Mel140分别用于131例和28例患者。主要和次要目标分别为总生存期(OS)和无进展生存期(PFS)。结果 中位随访时间为 5.8 年。90%以上的患者接受了以硼替佐米为基础的诱导治疗,76%以上的患者在ASCT前至少获得了很好的部分缓解(VGPR)。两组的 PFS 估计值相似(P=0.49)。Mel200的OS更长(HR=0.42,P=0.002)。在所有相关亚组中,Mel200均保持了OS优势。结论 在同质的 MM 患者中,Mel200 与较长的 OS 相关,这可能反映了患者的生理状态和对后续治疗的耐受性。EBMT的数据报告了Mel200与ASCT前VGPR或更好的患者死亡率的关系,但本研究的结果并不支持这种担忧。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
79
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Annals of Transplantation is one of the fast-developing journals open to all scientists and fields of transplant medicine and related research. The journal is published quarterly and provides extensive coverage of the most important advances in transplantation. Using an electronic on-line submission and peer review tracking system, Annals of Transplantation is committed to rapid review and publication. The average time to first decision is around 3-4 weeks. Time to publication of accepted manuscripts continues to be shortened, with the Editorial team committed to a goal of 3 months from acceptance to publication. Expert reseachers and clinicians from around the world contribute original Articles, Review Papers, Case Reports and Special Reports in every pertinent specialty, providing a lot of arguments for discussion of exciting developments and controversies in the field.
期刊最新文献
Pulmonary Embolism Following Living Donor Hepatectomy: A Report of 4 Cases and Literature Review. Retrospective Study to Compare Outcomes in 159 Patients Undergoing First Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation for Myeloma Treated with Melphalan 140 mg/m² or 200 mg/m². Medication Adherence Among Pediatric Post-Heart Transplant Patients in a Tertiary Care Hospital. Survival Analysis of Liver Transplants in Patients with Acute Liver Failure from Acetaminophen and Mushroom Toxicity. A New Routine Immunity Score (RIS2020) to Predict Severe Infection in Solid-Organ Transplant Recipients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1