PBPK-Led Assessment of Antimalarial Drug Concentrations in Breastmilk: A Strategy for Optimal Use of Prediction Methods to Guide Decision Making in an Understudied Population.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology Pub Date : 2025-02-11 DOI:10.1002/psp4.13311
Lisa M Almond, Khaled Abduljalil, Amita Pansari, Beata Kusmider, Hannah M Jones, Karen Rowland Yeo, Iain Gardner, Muhammad Faisal, Anne Claire Marrast, Myriam El Gaaloul, Jörg J Möhrle, Nada Abla
{"title":"PBPK-Led Assessment of Antimalarial Drug Concentrations in Breastmilk: A Strategy for Optimal Use of Prediction Methods to Guide Decision Making in an Understudied Population.","authors":"Lisa M Almond, Khaled Abduljalil, Amita Pansari, Beata Kusmider, Hannah M Jones, Karen Rowland Yeo, Iain Gardner, Muhammad Faisal, Anne Claire Marrast, Myriam El Gaaloul, Jörg J Möhrle, Nada Abla","doi":"10.1002/psp4.13311","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Treatment of breastfeeding mothers with malaria is challenging due to the lack of information describing drug exposure in milk and the daily dose to the breastfed infant. Physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling was used to predict milk-to-plasma (M/P) ratios, infant daily doses (IDD) and relative infant doses (RID) for five antimalarials with clinical lactation data (chloroquine, pyrimethamine, piperaquine, mefloquine and primaquine). In all cases, RID was correctly categorized as above or below the WHO proposed cut-off of 10% using two prediction models. Predicted M/P ratios were within 2-fold of observations for 63% of studies using both models (75% and 100% were within 3-fold for Models 1 and 2, respectively). M/P ratios, IDD and RID were predicted prospectively for seven antimalarials. RID was < 10% for amodiaquine, dihydroartemisinin, proguanil, and pyronaridine, and > 10% for lumefantrine and tafenoquine. For atovaquone, RID was > 10% with Model 1 but not Model 2. Predicted IDD were considerably lower than licensed doses for infants except for lumefantrine (Model 2) and tafenoquine (not licensed in < 2 years). Predictions were sensitive to drug properties (plasma protein binding and lipophilicity) and milk properties (creamatocrit and pH). This analysis demonstrates the utility of PBPK to predict milk exposure in the absence of clinical lactation information. These prediction methodologies can be used, alongside any licensed dosing information for < 1 year-olds, to evaluate whether a clinical lactation study is necessary and to inform drug label or policy recommendations. The ultimate goal is to better inform optimal treatment for lactating women supporting malaria eradication.</p>","PeriodicalId":10774,"journal":{"name":"CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/psp4.13311","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Treatment of breastfeeding mothers with malaria is challenging due to the lack of information describing drug exposure in milk and the daily dose to the breastfed infant. Physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling was used to predict milk-to-plasma (M/P) ratios, infant daily doses (IDD) and relative infant doses (RID) for five antimalarials with clinical lactation data (chloroquine, pyrimethamine, piperaquine, mefloquine and primaquine). In all cases, RID was correctly categorized as above or below the WHO proposed cut-off of 10% using two prediction models. Predicted M/P ratios were within 2-fold of observations for 63% of studies using both models (75% and 100% were within 3-fold for Models 1 and 2, respectively). M/P ratios, IDD and RID were predicted prospectively for seven antimalarials. RID was < 10% for amodiaquine, dihydroartemisinin, proguanil, and pyronaridine, and > 10% for lumefantrine and tafenoquine. For atovaquone, RID was > 10% with Model 1 but not Model 2. Predicted IDD were considerably lower than licensed doses for infants except for lumefantrine (Model 2) and tafenoquine (not licensed in < 2 years). Predictions were sensitive to drug properties (plasma protein binding and lipophilicity) and milk properties (creamatocrit and pH). This analysis demonstrates the utility of PBPK to predict milk exposure in the absence of clinical lactation information. These prediction methodologies can be used, alongside any licensed dosing information for < 1 year-olds, to evaluate whether a clinical lactation study is necessary and to inform drug label or policy recommendations. The ultimate goal is to better inform optimal treatment for lactating women supporting malaria eradication.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
11.40%
发文量
146
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Issue Information PBPK-Led Assessment of Antimalarial Drug Concentrations in Breastmilk: A Strategy for Optimal Use of Prediction Methods to Guide Decision Making in an Understudied Population. Elucidating Contributions of Drug Transporters/Enzyme to Nonlinear Pharmacokinetics of Grazoprevir by PBPK Modeling With a Cluster Gauss-Newton Method. Comparing Scientific Machine Learning With Population Pharmacokinetic and Classical Machine Learning Approaches for Prediction of Drug Concentrations. Population Pharmacokinetics and Exposure-Response of Subcutaneous Atezolizumab in Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1