AI-generated and doctors' answers to health-related questions.

IF 1.2 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Tidsskrift for Den Norske Laegeforening Pub Date : 2025-02-10 Print Date: 2025-02-11 DOI:10.4045/tidsskr.24.0402
Tiril Egset Mork, Håkon Garnes Mjøs, Harald Giskegjerde Nilsen, Sindre Kjelsrud, Alexander Selvikvåg Lundervold, Arvid Lundervold, Ib Jammer
{"title":"AI-generated and doctors' answers to health-related questions.","authors":"Tiril Egset Mork, Håkon Garnes Mjøs, Harald Giskegjerde Nilsen, Sindre Kjelsrud, Alexander Selvikvåg Lundervold, Arvid Lundervold, Ib Jammer","doi":"10.4045/tidsskr.24.0402","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Several studies have investigated how large language models answer health-related questions. In a study from 2023, responses to health-related questions in English generated by the language model GPT-3.5 were perceived as more empathetic and informative than responses from doctors. We wanted to apply the newer language model GPT-4 in Norwegian to investigate how respondents with a healthcare background rated responses to health-related questions from doctors and those generated by the language model.</p><p><strong>Material and method: </strong>A total of 192 health-related questions with corresponding answers from doctors were sourced from the website Studenterspør.no. The language model GPT-4 was used to generate a new set of answers to the same questions. Both sets of answers were evaluated by 344 respondents with a background in health care. The respondents, who were blinded to whether the answer was generated by a doctor or the language model, were asked to rate the empathy, quality of information and helpfulness of the answers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The survey consisted of 344 respondents and 192 questions. The average number of evaluations per answer was 5.7. There was a significant difference between doctors' answers and those generated by GPT-4 in terms of perceived empathy (p < 0.001), quality of information (p < 0.001) and helpfulness (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>The answers generated by GPT-4 were rated as more empathetic, informative and helpful than the answers from doctors. This suggests that AI could serve as an aid to healthcare personnel by drafting good responses to health-related questions.</p>","PeriodicalId":23123,"journal":{"name":"Tidsskrift for Den Norske Laegeforening","volume":"145 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tidsskrift for Den Norske Laegeforening","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4045/tidsskr.24.0402","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Several studies have investigated how large language models answer health-related questions. In a study from 2023, responses to health-related questions in English generated by the language model GPT-3.5 were perceived as more empathetic and informative than responses from doctors. We wanted to apply the newer language model GPT-4 in Norwegian to investigate how respondents with a healthcare background rated responses to health-related questions from doctors and those generated by the language model.

Material and method: A total of 192 health-related questions with corresponding answers from doctors were sourced from the website Studenterspør.no. The language model GPT-4 was used to generate a new set of answers to the same questions. Both sets of answers were evaluated by 344 respondents with a background in health care. The respondents, who were blinded to whether the answer was generated by a doctor or the language model, were asked to rate the empathy, quality of information and helpfulness of the answers.

Results: The survey consisted of 344 respondents and 192 questions. The average number of evaluations per answer was 5.7. There was a significant difference between doctors' answers and those generated by GPT-4 in terms of perceived empathy (p < 0.001), quality of information (p < 0.001) and helpfulness (p < 0.001).

Interpretation: The answers generated by GPT-4 were rated as more empathetic, informative and helpful than the answers from doctors. This suggests that AI could serve as an aid to healthcare personnel by drafting good responses to health-related questions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Tidsskrift for Den Norske Laegeforening
Tidsskrift for Den Norske Laegeforening MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
18.20%
发文量
593
审稿时长
28 weeks
期刊最新文献
AI-generated and doctors' answers to health-related questions. Can AI be empathetic? Pennestrøk mot helse og vitenskap. What does a Japanese gastrointestinal surgeon in Norway think? Rettelse: Toksikologiske funn ved overdoseselvmord 2016–21.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1