Anterior quadratus lumborum block in total hip arthroplasty: a two-center, randomized, placebo-controlled trial showing no additional benefit over multimodal analgesia.

IF 5.1 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine Pub Date : 2025-02-10 DOI:10.1136/rapm-2024-106247
Romain Rozier, Anouk Loiseleur, Charlotte Ciais, Ophélie Moulin, Baptiste Alais, Kewan Marguerite, Emmanuelle Badia, Laurie Tran, Juliette Balbo, Axel Maurice-Szamburski
{"title":"Anterior quadratus lumborum block in total hip arthroplasty: a two-center, randomized, placebo-controlled trial showing no additional benefit over multimodal analgesia.","authors":"Romain Rozier, Anouk Loiseleur, Charlotte Ciais, Ophélie Moulin, Baptiste Alais, Kewan Marguerite, Emmanuelle Badia, Laurie Tran, Juliette Balbo, Axel Maurice-Szamburski","doi":"10.1136/rapm-2024-106247","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Total hip arthroplasty (THA) frequently causes postoperative pain, hindering recovery and prolonging hospital stays. While multimodal analgesia aims to minimize opioid use and enhance outcomes, the optimal regional anesthesia technique is unclear due to the hip's complex innervation.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This multicenter randomized placebo-controlled trial evaluated whether adding an anterior quadratus lumborum block (QLB) to multimodal analgesia with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) reduces opioid consumption in THA patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>60 adults undergoing primary unilateral THA were randomized to receive either anterior QLB with 20 mL of 0.2% ropivacaine (n = 30) or a placebo saline injection (n = 30). All participants received multimodal analgesia including NSAIDs. The primary outcome was cumulative opioid consumption in oral morphine equivalents (OMEs) within the first 24 postoperative hours. Secondary outcomes included patient experience assessed by the EVAN scale on postoperative day 1, elevated pain and opioid consumption on days 1 and 2, time to first standing, walking distance and quadriceps strength on day 1, as well as walking progression, return to sport activity and analgesic use at 3 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant difference was found in 24-hour cumulative OME consumption between groups (median 40 mg (IQR 20-50 mg) vs 31 mg (IQR 20-45 mg); p = 0.6). Patient experience, pain scores and opioid consumption were similar. Rehabilitation outcomes at 3 months also did not differ.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Adding anterior QLB to multimodal analgesia did not reduce opioid consumption or enhance postoperative pain control and functional recovery in THA patients. Anterior QLB may not provide additional benefits when combined with multimodal analgesia with NSAID for THA.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>NCT04555291.</p>","PeriodicalId":54503,"journal":{"name":"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2024-106247","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Total hip arthroplasty (THA) frequently causes postoperative pain, hindering recovery and prolonging hospital stays. While multimodal analgesia aims to minimize opioid use and enhance outcomes, the optimal regional anesthesia technique is unclear due to the hip's complex innervation.

Objective: This multicenter randomized placebo-controlled trial evaluated whether adding an anterior quadratus lumborum block (QLB) to multimodal analgesia with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) reduces opioid consumption in THA patients.

Methods: 60 adults undergoing primary unilateral THA were randomized to receive either anterior QLB with 20 mL of 0.2% ropivacaine (n = 30) or a placebo saline injection (n = 30). All participants received multimodal analgesia including NSAIDs. The primary outcome was cumulative opioid consumption in oral morphine equivalents (OMEs) within the first 24 postoperative hours. Secondary outcomes included patient experience assessed by the EVAN scale on postoperative day 1, elevated pain and opioid consumption on days 1 and 2, time to first standing, walking distance and quadriceps strength on day 1, as well as walking progression, return to sport activity and analgesic use at 3 months.

Results: No significant difference was found in 24-hour cumulative OME consumption between groups (median 40 mg (IQR 20-50 mg) vs 31 mg (IQR 20-45 mg); p = 0.6). Patient experience, pain scores and opioid consumption were similar. Rehabilitation outcomes at 3 months also did not differ.

Conclusion: Adding anterior QLB to multimodal analgesia did not reduce opioid consumption or enhance postoperative pain control and functional recovery in THA patients. Anterior QLB may not provide additional benefits when combined with multimodal analgesia with NSAID for THA.

Trial registration number: NCT04555291.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
背景:全髋关节置换术(THA)经常会引起术后疼痛,阻碍患者康复并延长住院时间。虽然多模式镇痛旨在尽量减少阿片类药物的使用并提高疗效,但由于髋部神经支配复杂,最佳区域麻醉技术尚不明确:这项多中心随机安慰剂对照试验评估了在使用非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)进行多模式镇痛的基础上增加前方四腰肌阻滞(QLB)是否会减少 THA 患者的阿片类药物用量。方法:60 名接受原发性单侧 THA 的成人被随机分配接受前方 QLB,20 mL 0.2% 罗哌卡因(n = 30)或安慰剂生理盐水注射(n = 30)。所有参与者都接受了包括非甾体抗炎药在内的多模式镇痛。主要结果是术后 24 小时内以口服吗啡当量(OMEs)计的阿片类药物累积消耗量。次要结果包括术后第1天的EVAN量表评估的患者体验、第1天和第2天的疼痛加剧和阿片类药物消耗量、首次站立时间、第1天的行走距离和股四头肌力量,以及3个月时的行走进展、运动恢复情况和镇痛剂使用情况:结果:两组 24 小时累计 OME 消耗量无明显差异(中位数 40 毫克(IQR 20-50 毫克) vs 31 毫克(IQR 20-45 毫克);P = 0.6)。患者体验、疼痛评分和阿片类药物消耗量相似。3个月的康复结果也没有差异:结论:在多模式镇痛中加入前置 QLB 既不能减少阿片类药物的用量,也不能提高 THA 患者的术后疼痛控制和功能恢复。在使用非甾体抗炎药的多模式镇痛治疗THA时,前置QLB可能不会带来额外的益处:NCT04555291.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
11.80%
发文量
175
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine, the official publication of the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine (ASRA), is a monthly journal that publishes peer-reviewed scientific and clinical studies to advance the understanding and clinical application of regional techniques for surgical anesthesia and postoperative analgesia. Coverage includes intraoperative regional techniques, perioperative pain, chronic pain, obstetric anesthesia, pediatric anesthesia, outcome studies, and complications. Published for over thirty years, this respected journal also serves as the official publication of the European Society of Regional Anaesthesia and Pain Therapy (ESRA), the Asian and Oceanic Society of Regional Anesthesia (AOSRA), the Latin American Society of Regional Anesthesia (LASRA), the African Society for Regional Anesthesia (AFSRA), and the Academy of Regional Anaesthesia of India (AORA).
期刊最新文献
Clinical implication of regional osteopenia in complex regional pain syndrome: a retrospective comparative study. Liposomal bupivacaine: examining the factors behind inconsistent analgesic results. Driving under the influence of opioids in 2024: a narrative review of science and pandemic policy updates. Human versus artificial intelligence: evaluating ChatGPT's performance in conducting published systematic reviews with meta-analysis in chronic pain research. Analysis of complications of minimally invasive approaches for symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1