Driving under the influence of opioids in 2024: a narrative review of science and pandemic policy updates.

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine Pub Date : 2026-03-05 DOI:10.1136/rapm-2024-105955
Colin Kirsch, Patrick Wintergalen, Steven P Cohen, Zaman Mirzadeh, S Harrison Farber, Brian G Wilhelmi
{"title":"Driving under the influence of opioids in 2024: a narrative review of science and pandemic policy updates.","authors":"Colin Kirsch, Patrick Wintergalen, Steven P Cohen, Zaman Mirzadeh, S Harrison Farber, Brian G Wilhelmi","doi":"10.1136/rapm-2024-105955","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/importance: </strong>Driving under the influence of drugs (DUID) refers to operating a vehicle after consuming drugs or medications other than alcohol that impair the ability to drive safely. There is no consensus on legal limits for drug intoxication while driving in the USA. Balancing the benefits of prescription medications, such as opioids, with traffic safety remains an ongoing public health challenge.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This article examines DUID policy and provides recommendations for policy improvement and unification grounded in scientific evidence on opioid-related impairment and driving risks.</p><p><strong>Evidence review: </strong>A literature review of epidemiologic data, psychomotor effects, and public policy related to opioid use and driving was conducted. A total of 38 epidemiological studies, 21 studies on psychomotor effects, and pertinent laws and policies were reviewed.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Epidemiological data reveal an increasing prevalence of opioid-positive drivers and an association between opioid use and elevated risk of motor vehicle collisions. Psychomotor studies show mixed results, with some indicating impairment in opioid users and others suggesting minimal effects on driving ability. State laws regarding DUID remain heterogeneous, with trends toward expanded testing powers, lower impairment thresholds, and limitations on prescription-based defenses. The lack of standardized opioid testing limits and inconsistent policy approaches across states hinder effective management of opioid-related impaired driving.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A balanced public health approach can reduce opioid-involved crashes through education, prevention, enhanced enforcement tools, and rehabilitation. In drafting future DUID laws, policymakers must analyze evolving opioid research when balancing the pain relief of opioids with public roadway safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":54503,"journal":{"name":"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"261-270"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2024-105955","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/importance: Driving under the influence of drugs (DUID) refers to operating a vehicle after consuming drugs or medications other than alcohol that impair the ability to drive safely. There is no consensus on legal limits for drug intoxication while driving in the USA. Balancing the benefits of prescription medications, such as opioids, with traffic safety remains an ongoing public health challenge.

Objective: This article examines DUID policy and provides recommendations for policy improvement and unification grounded in scientific evidence on opioid-related impairment and driving risks.

Evidence review: A literature review of epidemiologic data, psychomotor effects, and public policy related to opioid use and driving was conducted. A total of 38 epidemiological studies, 21 studies on psychomotor effects, and pertinent laws and policies were reviewed.

Findings: Epidemiological data reveal an increasing prevalence of opioid-positive drivers and an association between opioid use and elevated risk of motor vehicle collisions. Psychomotor studies show mixed results, with some indicating impairment in opioid users and others suggesting minimal effects on driving ability. State laws regarding DUID remain heterogeneous, with trends toward expanded testing powers, lower impairment thresholds, and limitations on prescription-based defenses. The lack of standardized opioid testing limits and inconsistent policy approaches across states hinder effective management of opioid-related impaired driving.

Conclusions: A balanced public health approach can reduce opioid-involved crashes through education, prevention, enhanced enforcement tools, and rehabilitation. In drafting future DUID laws, policymakers must analyze evolving opioid research when balancing the pain relief of opioids with public roadway safety.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2024年在阿片类药物影响下驾驶:科学和流行病政策更新的叙述性回顾。
背景/重要性:药物影响下驾驶(DUID)是指在服用药物或酒精以外的药物后驾驶车辆,这些药物会损害安全驾驶的能力。在美国,对驾车时药物中毒的法律限制还没有达成共识。平衡阿片类药物等处方药的益处与交通安全仍然是一项持续的公共卫生挑战。目的:在阿片类药物相关损害和驾驶风险的科学证据基础上,研究DUID政策,并提出政策完善和统一的建议。证据回顾:对阿片类药物使用和驾驶相关的流行病学数据、精神运动效应和公共政策进行文献回顾。综述了38项流行病学研究、21项精神运动效应研究和相关法律政策。研究结果:流行病学数据显示,阿片类药物阳性驾驶员的患病率越来越高,阿片类药物使用与机动车碰撞风险增加之间存在关联。精神运动研究显示出好坏参半的结果,一些研究表明阿片类药物使用者会受到损害,而另一些研究则表明对驾驶能力的影响微乎其微。各州关于DUID的法律仍然不尽相同,有扩大检测权力、降低损害阈值和限制基于处方的防御的趋势。各州缺乏标准化的阿片类药物检测限制和不一致的政策方法阻碍了对阿片类药物相关驾驶障碍的有效管理。结论:平衡的公共卫生方法可以通过教育、预防、加强执法工具和康复来减少与阿片类药物有关的撞车事故。在起草未来的DUID法律时,政策制定者必须在平衡阿片类药物缓解疼痛与公共道路安全时分析不断发展的阿片类药物研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
11.80%
发文量
175
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine, the official publication of the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine (ASRA), is a monthly journal that publishes peer-reviewed scientific and clinical studies to advance the understanding and clinical application of regional techniques for surgical anesthesia and postoperative analgesia. Coverage includes intraoperative regional techniques, perioperative pain, chronic pain, obstetric anesthesia, pediatric anesthesia, outcome studies, and complications. Published for over thirty years, this respected journal also serves as the official publication of the European Society of Regional Anaesthesia and Pain Therapy (ESRA), the Asian and Oceanic Society of Regional Anesthesia (AOSRA), the Latin American Society of Regional Anesthesia (LASRA), the African Society for Regional Anesthesia (AFSRA), and the Academy of Regional Anaesthesia of India (AORA).
期刊最新文献
Online questions and information quality surrounding the novel non-opioid analgesic suzetrigine: analysis of publicly available web content. Mechanism-informed pain care: rebalancing procedural care toward better patient selection and outcomes. My half-century love affair with regional anesthesia: hard lessons from war to microanatomy to acute pain medicine and beyond. High levels of persistent pain among adolescents recovering from anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a single-center cohort study. Classification and stratification of patient pain archetypes following total knee arthroplasty: a machine learning approach.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1