Rapid rule-out of acute myocardial infarction using the 0/1-hour algorithm for cardiac troponins in emergency primary care: the OUT-ACS implementation study.

IF 2.9 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL BMC primary care Pub Date : 2025-02-10 DOI:10.1186/s12875-025-02723-2
Tonje R Johannessen, Sven Eirik Ruud, Anne Cecilie K Larstorp, Dan Atar, Sigrun Halvorsen, Beate Nilsen, Odd Martin Vallersnes
{"title":"Rapid rule-out of acute myocardial infarction using the 0/1-hour algorithm for cardiac troponins in emergency primary care: the OUT-ACS implementation study.","authors":"Tonje R Johannessen, Sven Eirik Ruud, Anne Cecilie K Larstorp, Dan Atar, Sigrun Halvorsen, Beate Nilsen, Odd Martin Vallersnes","doi":"10.1186/s12875-025-02723-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Acute chest pain has a high hospital referral rate due to the limited ability to exclude acute myocardial infarction (MI) in primary care. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of implementing the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) 0/1-hour algorithm for high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) testing in emergency primary care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a prospective study (April-October 2023), the ESC 0/1-hour algorithm for hs-cTnT was implemented at the main emergency primary care clinic in Oslo, Norway. All consecutive patients ≥ 18 years with acute non-traumatic chest pain having hs-cTnT measurements done were registered. The patients were assigned to MI rule-out, rule-in, or further observation using the algorithm. Patients in the observation group had a 4-hour hs-cTnT measurement done. The outcome measures were the proportion of patients conclusively assessed by the protocol, personnel adherence, reduction in length of stay (LOS) compared to the previous 0/4-hour protocol (historical cohort), and disposition.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During six months, hs-cTnT measurements were conducted in 32.6% (995/3053) of chest pain patients (median age 58 years (IQR 45-68); 50.6% female). A single hs-cTnT measurement assigned 24.1% (n = 240/995) towards MI rule-out, suitable for early discharge, increasing to 63.8% after adding a 1-hour measurement. The observation group (319/995, 32.1%) was reduced to 23.0% (229/995) after a 4-hour measurement. A total of 77.0% of the patients were conclusively assigned to either rule-out or rule-in group. The personnel adhered well to the new protocol, with a median 1-hour sampling interval of 63 min (IQR 60-66) and 4.6 h (IQR 4.1-5.5) for the 4-hour sample. The protocol was misinterpreted or overruled in 8.6% of the cases. Compared to the previous 0/4-hour protocol, LOS was reduced by -2.2 h (95% confidence intervals - 2.6 to -1.7). After completed assessment at the clinic, 14.8% were transferred to hospital, where 20 patients were diagnosed with an MI. The remaining patients were sent home or managed in the outpatient setting; any occurrence of MIs in this group is unknown.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The ESC 0/1-hour algorithm effectively assesses low-risk acute chest pain in emergency primary care, reinforcing its gatekeeper role by managing these patients at a lower level of care.</p>","PeriodicalId":72428,"journal":{"name":"BMC primary care","volume":"26 1","pages":"34"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11809029/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC primary care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-025-02723-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Acute chest pain has a high hospital referral rate due to the limited ability to exclude acute myocardial infarction (MI) in primary care. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of implementing the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) 0/1-hour algorithm for high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) testing in emergency primary care.

Methods: In a prospective study (April-October 2023), the ESC 0/1-hour algorithm for hs-cTnT was implemented at the main emergency primary care clinic in Oslo, Norway. All consecutive patients ≥ 18 years with acute non-traumatic chest pain having hs-cTnT measurements done were registered. The patients were assigned to MI rule-out, rule-in, or further observation using the algorithm. Patients in the observation group had a 4-hour hs-cTnT measurement done. The outcome measures were the proportion of patients conclusively assessed by the protocol, personnel adherence, reduction in length of stay (LOS) compared to the previous 0/4-hour protocol (historical cohort), and disposition.

Results: During six months, hs-cTnT measurements were conducted in 32.6% (995/3053) of chest pain patients (median age 58 years (IQR 45-68); 50.6% female). A single hs-cTnT measurement assigned 24.1% (n = 240/995) towards MI rule-out, suitable for early discharge, increasing to 63.8% after adding a 1-hour measurement. The observation group (319/995, 32.1%) was reduced to 23.0% (229/995) after a 4-hour measurement. A total of 77.0% of the patients were conclusively assigned to either rule-out or rule-in group. The personnel adhered well to the new protocol, with a median 1-hour sampling interval of 63 min (IQR 60-66) and 4.6 h (IQR 4.1-5.5) for the 4-hour sample. The protocol was misinterpreted or overruled in 8.6% of the cases. Compared to the previous 0/4-hour protocol, LOS was reduced by -2.2 h (95% confidence intervals - 2.6 to -1.7). After completed assessment at the clinic, 14.8% were transferred to hospital, where 20 patients were diagnosed with an MI. The remaining patients were sent home or managed in the outpatient setting; any occurrence of MIs in this group is unknown.

Conclusions: The ESC 0/1-hour algorithm effectively assesses low-risk acute chest pain in emergency primary care, reinforcing its gatekeeper role by managing these patients at a lower level of care.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
急诊初级保健中使用心肌肌钙蛋白0/1小时算法快速排除急性心肌梗死:OUT-ACS实施研究
背景:由于初级保健排除急性心肌梗死(MI)的能力有限,急性胸痛有很高的医院转诊率。我们的目的是评估在急诊初级保健中实施欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)高灵敏度心肌肌钙蛋白T (hs-cTnT)检测的0/1小时算法的有效性。方法:在一项前瞻性研究(2023年4月至10月)中,在挪威奥斯陆的主要急诊初级保健诊所实施了hs-cTnT的ESC 0/1小时算法。所有连续≥18年的急性非外伤性胸痛患者均进行了hs-cTnT测量。将患者分配到MI排除组、纳入组或使用该算法进行进一步观察。观察组患者进行4小时hs-cTnT测量。结果测量指标是通过方案最终评估的患者比例、人员依从性、与之前的0/4小时方案相比住院时间(LOS)的减少(历史队列)和处置。结果:在6个月内,32.6%(995/3053)的胸痛患者进行了hs-cTnT检测(中位年龄58岁(IQR 45-68);50.6%的女性)。单次hs-cTnT测量为24.1% (n = 240/995)排除心肌梗死,适合早期出院,增加1小时测量后增加到63.8%。观察组(319/995,32.1%)经4 h测量后降至23.0%(229/995)。共有77.0%的患者被最终分配到排除组或纳入组。人员很好地遵守了新方案,1小时采样间隔中位数为63分钟(IQR 60-66), 4小时采样间隔中位数为4.6小时(IQR 4.1-5.5)。在8.6%的病例中,协议被误解或被否决。与之前的0/4小时方案相比,LOS减少了-2.2小时(95%置信区间- 2.6至-1.7)。在诊所完成评估后,14.8%的患者被转移到医院,其中20名患者被诊断为心肌梗死。其余患者被送回家或在门诊进行治疗;在这个群体中是否发生MIs是未知的。结论:ESC 0/1小时算法在急诊初级保健中有效评估低风险急性胸痛,通过在较低护理水平管理这些患者,加强了其看门人的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Meeting the primary care needs of communities where they are: mobile primary care clinics, test and try evaluation, Nova Scotia Canada. Urban residents' choice preferences for hospitals at different tiers and influencing factors: a study based on latent class analysis and Andersen's model of health service utilization. Confidence level in diagnosing and treating skin disorders among Palestinian physicians: a cross- sectional study. Psychometric properties and constructs of Patient Reported Experience Measures (PREMs) in primary care: a scoping review. Layers of complexity: a directed content analysis of implementation determinants for integrative group medical visits for patients with chronic pain in safety-net primary care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1