Screening and detection of perinatal depression by non-physician primary healthcare workers in Nigeria.

IF 2.6 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL BMC primary care Pub Date : 2025-02-12 DOI:10.1186/s12875-025-02730-3
Bibilola D Oladeji, Olatunde O Ayinde, Toyin Bello, Lola Kola, Phyllis Zelkowitz, Soraya Seedat, Oye Gureje
{"title":"Screening and detection of perinatal depression by non-physician primary healthcare workers in Nigeria.","authors":"Bibilola D Oladeji, Olatunde O Ayinde, Toyin Bello, Lola Kola, Phyllis Zelkowitz, Soraya Seedat, Oye Gureje","doi":"10.1186/s12875-025-02730-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Detection of perinatal depression by healthcare providers remain an important barrier to receiving treatment. This study reports on the detection of perinatal depression by frontline non-physician primary healthcare workers (PHCWs) as well as the feasibility, effectiveness and acceptability of routine screening using the 2-item patient health questionnaire (PHQ-2) during antenatal care.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Twenty-seven primary healthcare facilities were assigned to screening (n = 11) and non-screening (n = 16) arms. All PHCWs in both arms were trained to diagnose and treat perinatal depression using the WHO mental health gap action intervention guide (mhGAP-IG) while those in the screening arm were trained to routinely screen with PHQ-2 first to determine need for further mhGAP-IG assessment. Perceived usefulness, feasibility and acceptability of routine screening for perinatal depression was explored in key informant interviews on a purposive sample of PHCWs (n = 20) and study participants (n = 22).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the first 6-months following training, the detection rate of perinatal depression was 4.6% at the clinics where PHCW were not routinely screening with the PHQ-2 compared to 11% at the screening clinics. Over the next six months, with refresher training for PHCW in the screening arm and the introduction of monthly supportive supervision for PHCW in both arms, detection rates increased from 4.6 to 7.6% at non-screening clinics and from 11 to 40% at the screening clinics. Over the entire study period only 81 (15.7%) out of the 517 cases of perinatal depression were detected by the PHCWs. Detection of depression by PHCWs was associated with the severity of depression symptoms and routine screening with PHQ-2. The introduction of routine screening was acceptable to both PHCWs and perinatal women. PHCWs reported that the PHQ-2 was useful, easy to administer and feasible for routine use.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Improving detection and subsequently the treatment gap for perinatal depression require not just training of frontline healthcare workers but the introduction of additional measures such as universal screening along with supportive supervision.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>The main study from which the data for this report was extracted was retrospectively registered 03 December 2019.</p><p><strong>Registration number: </strong>ISRCTN 94,230,307.</p>","PeriodicalId":72428,"journal":{"name":"BMC primary care","volume":"26 1","pages":"35"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11816751/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC primary care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-025-02730-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Detection of perinatal depression by healthcare providers remain an important barrier to receiving treatment. This study reports on the detection of perinatal depression by frontline non-physician primary healthcare workers (PHCWs) as well as the feasibility, effectiveness and acceptability of routine screening using the 2-item patient health questionnaire (PHQ-2) during antenatal care.

Method: Twenty-seven primary healthcare facilities were assigned to screening (n = 11) and non-screening (n = 16) arms. All PHCWs in both arms were trained to diagnose and treat perinatal depression using the WHO mental health gap action intervention guide (mhGAP-IG) while those in the screening arm were trained to routinely screen with PHQ-2 first to determine need for further mhGAP-IG assessment. Perceived usefulness, feasibility and acceptability of routine screening for perinatal depression was explored in key informant interviews on a purposive sample of PHCWs (n = 20) and study participants (n = 22).

Results: In the first 6-months following training, the detection rate of perinatal depression was 4.6% at the clinics where PHCW were not routinely screening with the PHQ-2 compared to 11% at the screening clinics. Over the next six months, with refresher training for PHCW in the screening arm and the introduction of monthly supportive supervision for PHCW in both arms, detection rates increased from 4.6 to 7.6% at non-screening clinics and from 11 to 40% at the screening clinics. Over the entire study period only 81 (15.7%) out of the 517 cases of perinatal depression were detected by the PHCWs. Detection of depression by PHCWs was associated with the severity of depression symptoms and routine screening with PHQ-2. The introduction of routine screening was acceptable to both PHCWs and perinatal women. PHCWs reported that the PHQ-2 was useful, easy to administer and feasible for routine use.

Conclusions: Improving detection and subsequently the treatment gap for perinatal depression require not just training of frontline healthcare workers but the introduction of additional measures such as universal screening along with supportive supervision.

Trial registration number: The main study from which the data for this report was extracted was retrospectively registered 03 December 2019.

Registration number: ISRCTN 94,230,307.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
尼日利亚非医师初级保健工作者对围产期抑郁症的筛查和检测。
背景:围产期抑郁症的检测由卫生保健提供者仍然是接受治疗的一个重要障碍。本研究报告了一线非医师初级卫生保健工作者(PHCWs)对围产期抑郁症的检测情况,以及在产前护理中采用2项患者健康问卷(PHQ-2)进行常规筛查的可行性、有效性和可接受性。方法:27家初级卫生保健机构被分配到筛查组(n = 11)和非筛查组(n = 16)。两组的所有初级保健护士都接受了使用世卫组织精神卫生差距行动干预指南(mhGAP-IG)诊断和治疗围产期抑郁症的培训,而筛查组的初级保健护士则接受了首先使用PHQ-2进行常规筛查的培训,以确定是否需要进一步进行mhGAP-IG评估。通过对PHCWs (n = 20)和研究参与者(n = 22)的关键信息提供者访谈,探讨围产期抑郁症常规筛查的感知有用性、可行性和可接受性。结果:在培训后的前6个月,PHCW未常规使用PHQ-2筛查的诊所围产期抑郁症的检出率为4.6%,而筛查诊所的检出率为11%。在接下来的6个月里,通过对筛查组的PHCW进行进修培训,以及对两组的PHCW进行每月的支持性监督,非筛查诊所的检出率从4.6%上升到7.6%,筛查诊所的检出率从11%上升到40%。在整个研究期间,517例围产期抑郁症中只有81例(15.7%)被PHCWs检测到。通过PHCWs检测抑郁症与抑郁症症状的严重程度和常规PHQ-2筛查相关。常规筛查的引入对初级保健员和围产期妇女都是可接受的。PHCWs报告PHQ-2是有用的,易于管理和可行的常规使用。结论:改善围产期抑郁症的发现和治疗差距不仅需要对一线医护人员进行培训,还需要引入其他措施,如普遍筛查和支持性监督。试验注册号:提取本报告数据的主要研究回顾性注册于2019年12月3日。注册号:ISRCTN 94,230,307。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Prevalence, diagnosis gap, and treatment patterns of hypertension in a primary care electronic health record cohort in Qatar: a retrospective cross-sectional study. General practitioner residents' mental health and satisfaction during their vocational training. Family physician involvement in aesthetic medicine in British Columbia: a cross sectional environmental scan. The importance of office spirometry in guiding the management of patients with chronic airway disorders in primary care. AUDACE: a study protocol for the realist mixed methods evaluation of the BCM2.0 occupational therapy and assistive device programme for older people aging in place.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1