Screening and detection of perinatal depression by non-physician primary healthcare workers in Nigeria.

IF 2 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL BMC primary care Pub Date : 2025-02-12 DOI:10.1186/s12875-025-02730-3
Bibilola D Oladeji, Olatunde O Ayinde, Toyin Bello, Lola Kola, Phyllis Zelkowitz, Soraya Seedat, Oye Gureje
{"title":"Screening and detection of perinatal depression by non-physician primary healthcare workers in Nigeria.","authors":"Bibilola D Oladeji, Olatunde O Ayinde, Toyin Bello, Lola Kola, Phyllis Zelkowitz, Soraya Seedat, Oye Gureje","doi":"10.1186/s12875-025-02730-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Detection of perinatal depression by healthcare providers remain an important barrier to receiving treatment. This study reports on the detection of perinatal depression by frontline non-physician primary healthcare workers (PHCWs) as well as the feasibility, effectiveness and acceptability of routine screening using the 2-item patient health questionnaire (PHQ-2) during antenatal care.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Twenty-seven primary healthcare facilities were assigned to screening (n = 11) and non-screening (n = 16) arms. All PHCWs in both arms were trained to diagnose and treat perinatal depression using the WHO mental health gap action intervention guide (mhGAP-IG) while those in the screening arm were trained to routinely screen with PHQ-2 first to determine need for further mhGAP-IG assessment. Perceived usefulness, feasibility and acceptability of routine screening for perinatal depression was explored in key informant interviews on a purposive sample of PHCWs (n = 20) and study participants (n = 22).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the first 6-months following training, the detection rate of perinatal depression was 4.6% at the clinics where PHCW were not routinely screening with the PHQ-2 compared to 11% at the screening clinics. Over the next six months, with refresher training for PHCW in the screening arm and the introduction of monthly supportive supervision for PHCW in both arms, detection rates increased from 4.6 to 7.6% at non-screening clinics and from 11 to 40% at the screening clinics. Over the entire study period only 81 (15.7%) out of the 517 cases of perinatal depression were detected by the PHCWs. Detection of depression by PHCWs was associated with the severity of depression symptoms and routine screening with PHQ-2. The introduction of routine screening was acceptable to both PHCWs and perinatal women. PHCWs reported that the PHQ-2 was useful, easy to administer and feasible for routine use.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Improving detection and subsequently the treatment gap for perinatal depression require not just training of frontline healthcare workers but the introduction of additional measures such as universal screening along with supportive supervision.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>The main study from which the data for this report was extracted was retrospectively registered 03 December 2019.</p><p><strong>Registration number: </strong>ISRCTN 94,230,307.</p>","PeriodicalId":72428,"journal":{"name":"BMC primary care","volume":"26 1","pages":"35"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC primary care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-025-02730-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Detection of perinatal depression by healthcare providers remain an important barrier to receiving treatment. This study reports on the detection of perinatal depression by frontline non-physician primary healthcare workers (PHCWs) as well as the feasibility, effectiveness and acceptability of routine screening using the 2-item patient health questionnaire (PHQ-2) during antenatal care.

Method: Twenty-seven primary healthcare facilities were assigned to screening (n = 11) and non-screening (n = 16) arms. All PHCWs in both arms were trained to diagnose and treat perinatal depression using the WHO mental health gap action intervention guide (mhGAP-IG) while those in the screening arm were trained to routinely screen with PHQ-2 first to determine need for further mhGAP-IG assessment. Perceived usefulness, feasibility and acceptability of routine screening for perinatal depression was explored in key informant interviews on a purposive sample of PHCWs (n = 20) and study participants (n = 22).

Results: In the first 6-months following training, the detection rate of perinatal depression was 4.6% at the clinics where PHCW were not routinely screening with the PHQ-2 compared to 11% at the screening clinics. Over the next six months, with refresher training for PHCW in the screening arm and the introduction of monthly supportive supervision for PHCW in both arms, detection rates increased from 4.6 to 7.6% at non-screening clinics and from 11 to 40% at the screening clinics. Over the entire study period only 81 (15.7%) out of the 517 cases of perinatal depression were detected by the PHCWs. Detection of depression by PHCWs was associated with the severity of depression symptoms and routine screening with PHQ-2. The introduction of routine screening was acceptable to both PHCWs and perinatal women. PHCWs reported that the PHQ-2 was useful, easy to administer and feasible for routine use.

Conclusions: Improving detection and subsequently the treatment gap for perinatal depression require not just training of frontline healthcare workers but the introduction of additional measures such as universal screening along with supportive supervision.

Trial registration number: The main study from which the data for this report was extracted was retrospectively registered 03 December 2019.

Registration number: ISRCTN 94,230,307.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Management of gout in primary care of Hong Kong in accordance with international guidelines: any gaps to bridge? Patient history of cancer in primary care: a closer look among cancer survivors with chronic conditions in federally qualified health centers. Pregnancy intention, preconception health, health behaviours, and information and health advice seeking among expectant male partners. Related factors of turnover intention among general practitioners: a cross-sectional study in 6 provinces of China. Screening and detection of perinatal depression by non-physician primary healthcare workers in Nigeria.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1