One-year real-world benefits of Tandem Control-IQ technology on glucose management and person-reported outcomes in adults with type 1 diabetes: a prospective observational cohort study

IF 8.4 1区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Diabetologia Pub Date : 2025-02-11 DOI:10.1007/s00125-025-06366-x
Jolien De Meulemeester, Bart Keymeulen, Christophe De Block, Liesbeth Van Huffel, Youri Taes, Dominique Ballaux, Katrien Spincemaille, Bruno Lapauw, Gerd Vanhaverbeke, Ine Lowyck, Chris Vercammen, Ides M. Colin, Vanessa Preumont, Sara Charleer, Steffen Fieuws, Chantal Mathieu, Pieter Gillard
{"title":"One-year real-world benefits of Tandem Control-IQ technology on glucose management and person-reported outcomes in adults with type 1 diabetes: a prospective observational cohort study","authors":"Jolien De Meulemeester, Bart Keymeulen, Christophe De Block, Liesbeth Van Huffel, Youri Taes, Dominique Ballaux, Katrien Spincemaille, Bruno Lapauw, Gerd Vanhaverbeke, Ine Lowyck, Chris Vercammen, Ides M. Colin, Vanessa Preumont, Sara Charleer, Steffen Fieuws, Chantal Mathieu, Pieter Gillard","doi":"10.1007/s00125-025-06366-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Aims/hypothesis</h3><p>This multicentre prospective observational cohort study aimed to evaluate real-world changes in glycaemic and person-reported outcomes after 1 year’s use of Control-IQ technology in adults with type 1 diabetes.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>Adults who started with Control-IQ between December 2021 and December 2022 were consecutively recruited in 13 Belgian diabetes centres. Data were collected at start and after 4, 8 and 12 months. The primary endpoint was the evolution of time in range (TIR; glucose levels of 3.9–10.0 mmol/l). Data are reported as mean ± SD or least-squares mean (95% CI).</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>A total of 473 adults were included, with a mean age of 38.5 ± 13.1 years and of whom 57.3% were female. TIR increased from 58.8% (95% CI 56.7, 60.9) at start to 70.9% (69.1, 72.8) at 12 months (<i>p</i>&lt;0.001). HbA<sub>1c</sub> decreased from 57.3 mmol/mol (56.1, 58.5) (7.4% [7.3, 7.5]) to 49.5 mmol/mol (48.5, 50.6) (6.7% [6.6, 6.8]) and time &lt;3.9 mmol/l from 4.2% (3.9, 4.6) to 1.9% (1.8, 2.1) (all <i>p</i>&lt;0.001). Participants scored better on the Hypoglycaemia Fear Survey version 2 worry (22.5 [21.3, 23.7] vs 18.1 points [17.0, 19.3]), the Problem Areas in Diabetes - Short Form (7.2 [6.7, 7.8] vs 6.1 points [5.5, 6.7]), and the Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire status (25.5 [24.8, 26.2] vs 31.0 points [30.4, 31.6]) (all <i>p</i>&lt;0.001). The number of self-reported severe hypoglycaemia events (37.5 [21.3, 65.9] vs 15.7 [9.7, 25.3] events per 100 person-years, <i>p</i>=0.002) and work absenteeism days (116.3 [42.8, 315.5] vs 69.3 [25.4, 189.2] days per 100 person-years, <i>p</i>=0.034) decreased.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusions/interpretation</h3><p>One-year use of Control-IQ was associated with better glucose management, improved diabetes-related quality of life, more treatment satisfaction, less severe hypoglycaemia and less work absenteeism in adults with type 1 diabetes.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Trial registration</h3><p>ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04414280</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Graphical Abstract</h3>\n","PeriodicalId":11164,"journal":{"name":"Diabetologia","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetologia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-025-06366-x","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims/hypothesis

This multicentre prospective observational cohort study aimed to evaluate real-world changes in glycaemic and person-reported outcomes after 1 year’s use of Control-IQ technology in adults with type 1 diabetes.

Methods

Adults who started with Control-IQ between December 2021 and December 2022 were consecutively recruited in 13 Belgian diabetes centres. Data were collected at start and after 4, 8 and 12 months. The primary endpoint was the evolution of time in range (TIR; glucose levels of 3.9–10.0 mmol/l). Data are reported as mean ± SD or least-squares mean (95% CI).

Results

A total of 473 adults were included, with a mean age of 38.5 ± 13.1 years and of whom 57.3% were female. TIR increased from 58.8% (95% CI 56.7, 60.9) at start to 70.9% (69.1, 72.8) at 12 months (p<0.001). HbA1c decreased from 57.3 mmol/mol (56.1, 58.5) (7.4% [7.3, 7.5]) to 49.5 mmol/mol (48.5, 50.6) (6.7% [6.6, 6.8]) and time <3.9 mmol/l from 4.2% (3.9, 4.6) to 1.9% (1.8, 2.1) (all p<0.001). Participants scored better on the Hypoglycaemia Fear Survey version 2 worry (22.5 [21.3, 23.7] vs 18.1 points [17.0, 19.3]), the Problem Areas in Diabetes - Short Form (7.2 [6.7, 7.8] vs 6.1 points [5.5, 6.7]), and the Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire status (25.5 [24.8, 26.2] vs 31.0 points [30.4, 31.6]) (all p<0.001). The number of self-reported severe hypoglycaemia events (37.5 [21.3, 65.9] vs 15.7 [9.7, 25.3] events per 100 person-years, p=0.002) and work absenteeism days (116.3 [42.8, 315.5] vs 69.3 [25.4, 189.2] days per 100 person-years, p=0.034) decreased.

Conclusions/interpretation

One-year use of Control-IQ was associated with better glucose management, improved diabetes-related quality of life, more treatment satisfaction, less severe hypoglycaemia and less work absenteeism in adults with type 1 diabetes.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04414280

Graphical Abstract

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Diabetologia
Diabetologia 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
18.10
自引率
2.40%
发文量
193
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Diabetologia, the authoritative journal dedicated to diabetes research, holds high visibility through society membership, libraries, and social media. As the official journal of the European Association for the Study of Diabetes, it is ranked in the top quartile of the 2019 JCR Impact Factors in the Endocrinology & Metabolism category. The journal boasts dedicated and expert editorial teams committed to supporting authors throughout the peer review process.
期刊最新文献
Considerations for more actionable consensus guidance for monitoring individuals with islet autoantibody-positive pre-stage 3 type 1 diabetes. Reply to Mallone R [letter]. Diabetic gastroenteropathy: a pan-alimentary complication Continuous glucose monitor metrics from five studies identify participants at risk for type 1 diabetes development One-year real-world benefits of Tandem Control-IQ technology on glucose management and person-reported outcomes in adults with type 1 diabetes: a prospective observational cohort study Partnership and marriage and risk of type 2 diabetes: a narrative review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1