Otto J. Mulleners, Lieve E. van der Maarel, Vincent M. Christoffels, Bjarke Jensen
{"title":"The trabecular and compact myocardium of adult vertebrate ventricles are transcriptionally similar despite morphological differences","authors":"Otto J. Mulleners, Lieve E. van der Maarel, Vincent M. Christoffels, Bjarke Jensen","doi":"10.1111/nyas.15296","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A poorly understood, major event in heart evolution is the convergent prioritization in mammals and birds of compact myocardium over trabecular myocardium. Compact myocardium is thought to facilitate the greater cardiac outputs that distinguish endothermic mammals and birds from ectotherms, but the underlying mechanism remains unclear. We used transcriptomics to investigate whether the compact layer myocardium is intrinsically different from that of the trabecular layer. In the embryonic mouse heart, spatial transcriptomics revealed that 3% of detected genes were differentially expressed between trabecular and compact myocardium. In the adult, this analysis yielded only 0.2% differentially expressed genes. Additionally, the transcriptomes of both embryonic trabecular and compact myocardium greatly differed from those of the adult myocardium. Reanalysis of available single-cell transcriptomes showed relationships between human embryonic and adult trabecular and compact myocardium similar to those in mice. Analysis of new and published transcriptomes from adult zebra finch, zebrafish, and tuna revealed few differentially expressed genes (<0.6%) and no conservation between species. We conclude that the transcriptional states of developing trabecular and compact myocardium do not persist into adulthood. In adult hearts, the compact layer myocardium is not intrinsically different from that of the trabecular layer despite the overt morphological differences.","PeriodicalId":8250,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.15296","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
A poorly understood, major event in heart evolution is the convergent prioritization in mammals and birds of compact myocardium over trabecular myocardium. Compact myocardium is thought to facilitate the greater cardiac outputs that distinguish endothermic mammals and birds from ectotherms, but the underlying mechanism remains unclear. We used transcriptomics to investigate whether the compact layer myocardium is intrinsically different from that of the trabecular layer. In the embryonic mouse heart, spatial transcriptomics revealed that 3% of detected genes were differentially expressed between trabecular and compact myocardium. In the adult, this analysis yielded only 0.2% differentially expressed genes. Additionally, the transcriptomes of both embryonic trabecular and compact myocardium greatly differed from those of the adult myocardium. Reanalysis of available single-cell transcriptomes showed relationships between human embryonic and adult trabecular and compact myocardium similar to those in mice. Analysis of new and published transcriptomes from adult zebra finch, zebrafish, and tuna revealed few differentially expressed genes (<0.6%) and no conservation between species. We conclude that the transcriptional states of developing trabecular and compact myocardium do not persist into adulthood. In adult hearts, the compact layer myocardium is not intrinsically different from that of the trabecular layer despite the overt morphological differences.
期刊介绍:
Published on behalf of the New York Academy of Sciences, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences provides multidisciplinary perspectives on research of current scientific interest with far-reaching implications for the wider scientific community and society at large. Each special issue assembles the best thinking of key contributors to a field of investigation at a time when emerging developments offer the promise of new insight. Individually themed, Annals special issues stimulate new ways to think about science by providing a neutral forum for discourse—within and across many institutions and fields.