Consensus reaching for large-scale group decision making: A gain-loss analysis perspective

IF 7.5 1区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE Expert Systems with Applications Pub Date : 2025-05-05 Epub Date: 2025-02-13 DOI:10.1016/j.eswa.2025.126742
Xiangyu Zhong , Jing Cao , Wentao Yi , Zhijiao Du
{"title":"Consensus reaching for large-scale group decision making: A gain-loss analysis perspective","authors":"Xiangyu Zhong ,&nbsp;Jing Cao ,&nbsp;Wentao Yi ,&nbsp;Zhijiao Du","doi":"10.1016/j.eswa.2025.126742","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Large-scale group decision making (LSGDM) is increasingly prevalent in practical scenarios, with consensus reaching being a crucial aspect that concerns the effectiveness and efficiency of the decision-making process. This paper proposes an innovative consensus reaching method for LSGDM, adopting a novel perspective that focuses on gains and losses. First, the gains and losses of experts during the clustering process are computed using recognition increment and representativeness decrement, which are combined to determine their utility. By ensuring that experts receive a high level of utility, a clustering method is proposed to categorize a large number of experts into distinct clusters. Then, an optimization model is presented to determine the weights of clusters, with the objective of maximizing the utility of clusters. Next, a feedback mechanism is developed, grounded in the concept of gains and losses, to enhance consensus levels. During the feedback adjustment process, the gains and losses of clusters are assessed based on changes in consensus levels and the adjustment costs incurred when clusters modify their information. These gains and losses are combined to determine the utility of clusters, serving as the foundation for designing the feedback mechanism. Finally, an application example of blockchain platform selection is presented, along with comparative analyses to validate the proposed method.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50461,"journal":{"name":"Expert Systems with Applications","volume":"272 ","pages":"Article 126742"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Systems with Applications","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957417425003641","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Large-scale group decision making (LSGDM) is increasingly prevalent in practical scenarios, with consensus reaching being a crucial aspect that concerns the effectiveness and efficiency of the decision-making process. This paper proposes an innovative consensus reaching method for LSGDM, adopting a novel perspective that focuses on gains and losses. First, the gains and losses of experts during the clustering process are computed using recognition increment and representativeness decrement, which are combined to determine their utility. By ensuring that experts receive a high level of utility, a clustering method is proposed to categorize a large number of experts into distinct clusters. Then, an optimization model is presented to determine the weights of clusters, with the objective of maximizing the utility of clusters. Next, a feedback mechanism is developed, grounded in the concept of gains and losses, to enhance consensus levels. During the feedback adjustment process, the gains and losses of clusters are assessed based on changes in consensus levels and the adjustment costs incurred when clusters modify their information. These gains and losses are combined to determine the utility of clusters, serving as the foundation for designing the feedback mechanism. Finally, an application example of blockchain platform selection is presented, along with comparative analyses to validate the proposed method.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
大规模群体决策的共识达成:得失分析视角
大规模群体决策(large - large group decision making, LSGDM)在实际场景中越来越普遍,而达成共识是关系到决策过程有效性和效率的一个重要方面。本文提出了一种创新的LSGDM共识达成方法,采用了一种关注得失的新视角。首先,利用识别增量和代表性减量计算专家在聚类过程中的收益和损失,并将两者结合起来确定其效用;在保证专家获得高水平效用的前提下,提出了一种聚类方法,将大量专家划分为不同的聚类。然后,以集群效用最大化为目标,提出了确定集群权重的优化模型。其次,在得失概念的基础上建立反馈机制,以提高协商一致的程度。在反馈调整过程中,根据共识水平的变化和集群修改信息时产生的调整成本来评估集群的收益和损失。这些收益和损失结合起来决定集群的效用,作为设计反馈机制的基础。最后,给出了区块链平台选择的应用实例,并进行了对比分析,验证了所提方法的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Expert Systems with Applications
Expert Systems with Applications 工程技术-工程:电子与电气
CiteScore
13.80
自引率
10.60%
发文量
2045
审稿时长
8.7 months
期刊介绍: Expert Systems With Applications is an international journal dedicated to the exchange of information on expert and intelligent systems used globally in industry, government, and universities. The journal emphasizes original papers covering the design, development, testing, implementation, and management of these systems, offering practical guidelines. It spans various sectors such as finance, engineering, marketing, law, project management, information management, medicine, and more. The journal also welcomes papers on multi-agent systems, knowledge management, neural networks, knowledge discovery, data mining, and other related areas, excluding applications to military/defense systems.
期刊最新文献
FairDiff: Masked condition diffusion for fairness-aware recommendation CTGAN-MNLIME: A CTGAN-boosted multidimensional nonlinear LIME method for corporate environmental indicators prediction An explainable machine learning-based scoring function using interpretable features and model explanation approaches for binding affinity prediction Hybrid fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making model for assessing sustainable waste management strategies MPGCF: Multi-objective and popularity-smoothing graph collaborative filtering for long-tail web API recommendation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1