A combined scoring system for tumor budding and poorly differentiated clusters in colorectal cancer: A retrospective study

Adil Aziz Khan, Sana Ahuja, Sristi Barman, Sufian Zaheer
{"title":"A combined scoring system for tumor budding and poorly differentiated clusters in colorectal cancer: A retrospective study","authors":"Adil Aziz Khan,&nbsp;Sana Ahuja,&nbsp;Sristi Barman,&nbsp;Sufian Zaheer","doi":"10.1016/j.cson.2025.100073","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Optimal management of stage II colorectal cancer (CRC) patients is complex due to variability in oncologic outcomes. Tumor budding (TB) and poorly differentiated clusters (PDCs) have emerged as significant prognostic factors. This study evaluates the prognostic significance of a combined scoring system of TB and PDCs in CRC patients.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>A retrospective study included 68 patients who underwent curative surgery. H&amp;E-stained sections were assessed for TB and PDCs. TB was graded according to ITBCC recommendations: Bd1 (0–4 buds), Bd2 (5–9 buds), and Bd3 (≥10 buds). PDCs were counted as clusters of ≥5 ​cells without gland formation: PDC1 (0–4 clusters), PDC2 (5–9 clusters), and PDC3 (≥10 clusters). TB and PDC scores were combined, resulting in a score range of 2–4. Histological sections were also evaluated for lymphovascular invasion (LVI), perineural invasion (PNI), and other pathological parameters. Statistical analyses were performed using Chi-Square and Fisher's exact tests.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>TB was high in 32.35% of cases and low in 47.06%. High PDCs were present in 47.06% of cases. The combined scoring system showed 55.88% of cases with a score of 3, indicating intermediate risk. Statistical significance was observed between combined scores and T stage, LVI, PNI, histological grade, extranodal extension, and tumor size (p ​&lt; ​0.05).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The combined scoring system for TB and PDCs demonstrated superior prognostic performance compared to individual assessments. This system provides a more comprehensive risk stratification, which may guide more tailored treatment decisions in CRC management.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100278,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Surgical Oncology","volume":"4 1","pages":"Article 100073"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Surgical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773160X25000029","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Optimal management of stage II colorectal cancer (CRC) patients is complex due to variability in oncologic outcomes. Tumor budding (TB) and poorly differentiated clusters (PDCs) have emerged as significant prognostic factors. This study evaluates the prognostic significance of a combined scoring system of TB and PDCs in CRC patients.

Materials and methods

A retrospective study included 68 patients who underwent curative surgery. H&E-stained sections were assessed for TB and PDCs. TB was graded according to ITBCC recommendations: Bd1 (0–4 buds), Bd2 (5–9 buds), and Bd3 (≥10 buds). PDCs were counted as clusters of ≥5 ​cells without gland formation: PDC1 (0–4 clusters), PDC2 (5–9 clusters), and PDC3 (≥10 clusters). TB and PDC scores were combined, resulting in a score range of 2–4. Histological sections were also evaluated for lymphovascular invasion (LVI), perineural invasion (PNI), and other pathological parameters. Statistical analyses were performed using Chi-Square and Fisher's exact tests.

Results

TB was high in 32.35% of cases and low in 47.06%. High PDCs were present in 47.06% of cases. The combined scoring system showed 55.88% of cases with a score of 3, indicating intermediate risk. Statistical significance was observed between combined scores and T stage, LVI, PNI, histological grade, extranodal extension, and tumor size (p ​< ​0.05).

Conclusion

The combined scoring system for TB and PDCs demonstrated superior prognostic performance compared to individual assessments. This system provides a more comprehensive risk stratification, which may guide more tailored treatment decisions in CRC management.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A comprehensive narrative review on paradigm shift in the treatment of esophageal and rectal cancer A combined scoring system for tumor budding and poorly differentiated clusters in colorectal cancer: A retrospective study Global disparities in surgical oncology: Bridging the gap in cancer care a challenge to overcome Patients who have undergone total gastrectomy investigation of self-management experiences on dumping syndrome Clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes of Vulvar cancer patients at a tertiary setting in Ethiopia: A 6-year review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1