Learning as retention; an examination of retention of self-derived knowledge through memory integration in a diverse sample of elementary students

IF 3.8 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL Learning and Individual Differences Pub Date : 2025-02-12 DOI:10.1016/j.lindif.2025.102655
Alena G. Esposito
{"title":"Learning as retention; an examination of retention of self-derived knowledge through memory integration in a diverse sample of elementary students","authors":"Alena G. Esposito","doi":"10.1016/j.lindif.2025.102655","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Children learn through direct tuition, but also through productive processes that result in self-derived knowledge that was not directly taught. For example, if a child learns that liquid expands when heated, then they learn that thermometers contain liquid, they can derive the new knowledge that thermometers work because the liquid inside expands when heated. Previous work has shown that children engage in self-derivation through memory integration in their classrooms and performance predicts academic performance. However, there has been little examination of the retention of the products of productive processes. Given the importance of retention for long-term knowledge building, we examined the retention of the products of self-derivation through memory integration in elementary students across two studies. Study 1 examined retention of the products of self-derivation through integration in classrooms. In Study 2, we replicated Study 1 with a new sample and stimuli aligned to the curriculum (2a) and examined whether graphics at encoding support retention (2b). Across both studies, we examined whether retention performance accounts for individual differences in academic performance. The results indicate that children do retain knowledge gained through productive processes for at least one week. Further, support at encoding through the use of graphics facilitates retention. We also found support for retention accounting for individual differences in academic performance.</div></div><div><h3>Educational relevance statement</h3><div>Children learn through direct instruction but also through knowledge they generate themselves by integrating facts across lessons. For example, if a child learns that liquid expands when heated, then they learn that thermometers contain liquid, they can derive the new knowledge that thermometers work because the liquid inside expands when heated. Individual ability to self-derive knowledge predicts academic performance. In this research, we examined retention of the self-derived knowledge after a one-week delay. In Study 1, we found that retention is difficult. Children had significant loss in memory over the one-week delay. In Study 2, we examined integration and retention of curriculum aligned facts and examined whether adding a graphic to the fact presentation supported retention. We again found evidence for retention and the addition of a graphic at fact presentation resulted in an increase in performance. Across both studies, self-derivation of knowledge and retention of that knowledge predicted individual differences in academic performance in both reading and math.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48336,"journal":{"name":"Learning and Individual Differences","volume":"119 ","pages":"Article 102655"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learning and Individual Differences","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1041608025000317","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Children learn through direct tuition, but also through productive processes that result in self-derived knowledge that was not directly taught. For example, if a child learns that liquid expands when heated, then they learn that thermometers contain liquid, they can derive the new knowledge that thermometers work because the liquid inside expands when heated. Previous work has shown that children engage in self-derivation through memory integration in their classrooms and performance predicts academic performance. However, there has been little examination of the retention of the products of productive processes. Given the importance of retention for long-term knowledge building, we examined the retention of the products of self-derivation through memory integration in elementary students across two studies. Study 1 examined retention of the products of self-derivation through integration in classrooms. In Study 2, we replicated Study 1 with a new sample and stimuli aligned to the curriculum (2a) and examined whether graphics at encoding support retention (2b). Across both studies, we examined whether retention performance accounts for individual differences in academic performance. The results indicate that children do retain knowledge gained through productive processes for at least one week. Further, support at encoding through the use of graphics facilitates retention. We also found support for retention accounting for individual differences in academic performance.

Educational relevance statement

Children learn through direct instruction but also through knowledge they generate themselves by integrating facts across lessons. For example, if a child learns that liquid expands when heated, then they learn that thermometers contain liquid, they can derive the new knowledge that thermometers work because the liquid inside expands when heated. Individual ability to self-derive knowledge predicts academic performance. In this research, we examined retention of the self-derived knowledge after a one-week delay. In Study 1, we found that retention is difficult. Children had significant loss in memory over the one-week delay. In Study 2, we examined integration and retention of curriculum aligned facts and examined whether adding a graphic to the fact presentation supported retention. We again found evidence for retention and the addition of a graphic at fact presentation resulted in an increase in performance. Across both studies, self-derivation of knowledge and retention of that knowledge predicted individual differences in academic performance in both reading and math.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Learning and Individual Differences
Learning and Individual Differences PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL-
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
2.80%
发文量
86
期刊介绍: Learning and Individual Differences is a research journal devoted to publishing articles of individual differences as they relate to learning within an educational context. The Journal focuses on original empirical studies of high theoretical and methodological rigor that that make a substantial scientific contribution. Learning and Individual Differences publishes original research. Manuscripts should be no longer than 7500 words of primary text (not including tables, figures, references).
期刊最新文献
Learning as retention; an examination of retention of self-derived knowledge through memory integration in a diverse sample of elementary students Exploring the emotion-motivation nexus in English-medium higher education: A longitudinal mixed-methods study Chatbots in education: Hype or help? A meta-analysis The influence of competitive and cooperative classroom climate on middle school students' academic help seeking A piece of the puzzle to understand the association between instructional support and student engagement
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1