A statistical framework for district energy long-term electric load forecasting

IF 11 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS Applied Energy Pub Date : 2025-04-15 Epub Date: 2025-02-13 DOI:10.1016/j.apenergy.2025.125445
Emily Royal , Soutir Bandyopadhyay , Alexandra Newman , Qiuhua Huang , Paulo Cesar Tabares-Velasco
{"title":"A statistical framework for district energy long-term electric load forecasting","authors":"Emily Royal ,&nbsp;Soutir Bandyopadhyay ,&nbsp;Alexandra Newman ,&nbsp;Qiuhua Huang ,&nbsp;Paulo Cesar Tabares-Velasco","doi":"10.1016/j.apenergy.2025.125445","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>An accurate forecast of electric demand is essential for the optimal design of a generation system. For district installations, the projected lifespan may extend one or two decades. The reliance on a single-year forecast, combined with a fixed load growth rate, is the current industry standard, but does not support a multi-decade investment. Existing work on long-term forecasting focuses on annual growth rate and/or uses time resolution that is coarser than hourly. To address the gap, we propose multiple statistical forecast models, verified over as long as an 11-year horizon. Combining demand data, weather data, and occupancy trends results in a hybrid statistical model, i.e., generalized additive model (GAM) with a seasonal autoregressive integrated moving average (SARIMA) of the GAM residuals, a multiple linear regression (MLR) model, and a GAM with ARIMA errors model. We evaluate accuracy based on: (i) annual growth rates of monthly peak loads; (ii) annual growth rates of overall energy consumption; (iii) preservation of daily, weekly, and month-to-month trends that occur within each year, known as the “seasonality” of the data; and, (iv) realistic representation of demand for a full range of weather and occupancy conditions. For example, the models yield an 11-year forecast from a one-year training data set with a normalized root mean square error of 9.091%, a six-year forecast from a one-year training data set with a normalized root mean square error of 8.949%, and a one-year forecast from a 1.2-year training data set with a normalized root mean square error of 6.765%.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":246,"journal":{"name":"Applied Energy","volume":"384 ","pages":"Article 125445"},"PeriodicalIF":11.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Energy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261925001758","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

An accurate forecast of electric demand is essential for the optimal design of a generation system. For district installations, the projected lifespan may extend one or two decades. The reliance on a single-year forecast, combined with a fixed load growth rate, is the current industry standard, but does not support a multi-decade investment. Existing work on long-term forecasting focuses on annual growth rate and/or uses time resolution that is coarser than hourly. To address the gap, we propose multiple statistical forecast models, verified over as long as an 11-year horizon. Combining demand data, weather data, and occupancy trends results in a hybrid statistical model, i.e., generalized additive model (GAM) with a seasonal autoregressive integrated moving average (SARIMA) of the GAM residuals, a multiple linear regression (MLR) model, and a GAM with ARIMA errors model. We evaluate accuracy based on: (i) annual growth rates of monthly peak loads; (ii) annual growth rates of overall energy consumption; (iii) preservation of daily, weekly, and month-to-month trends that occur within each year, known as the “seasonality” of the data; and, (iv) realistic representation of demand for a full range of weather and occupancy conditions. For example, the models yield an 11-year forecast from a one-year training data set with a normalized root mean square error of 9.091%, a six-year forecast from a one-year training data set with a normalized root mean square error of 8.949%, and a one-year forecast from a 1.2-year training data set with a normalized root mean square error of 6.765%.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
区域能源长期电力负荷预测的统计框架
准确的电力需求预测对发电系统的优化设计至关重要。至于地区装置,预计寿命可延长一至二十年。对单年预测的依赖,加上固定的负荷增长率,是目前的行业标准,但不支持数十年的投资。现有的长期预测工作侧重于年增长率和/或使用比小时更粗糙的时间分辨率。为了解决这一差距,我们提出了多个统计预测模型,并在长达11年的时间跨度内进行了验证。将需求数据、天气数据和入住率趋势相结合,可以得到一个混合统计模型,即GAM残差的季节性自回归综合移动平均(SARIMA)广义加性模型(GAM)、多元线性回归(MLR)模型和带有ARIMA误差模型的GAM。我们基于以下因素评估准确性:(i)每月峰值负荷的年增长率;(二)总能源消费的年增长率;(iii)保存每一年内每日、每周和每月的趋势,称为数据的“季节性”;(iv)对各种天气和入住条件的实际需求表示。例如,模型从1年训练数据集得出的11年预测的归一化均方根误差为9.091%,从1年训练数据集得出的6年预测的归一化均方根误差为8.949%,从1.2年训练数据集得出的1年预测的归一化均方根误差为6.765%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Energy
Applied Energy 工程技术-工程:化工
CiteScore
21.20
自引率
10.70%
发文量
1830
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: Applied Energy serves as a platform for sharing innovations, research, development, and demonstrations in energy conversion, conservation, and sustainable energy systems. The journal covers topics such as optimal energy resource use, environmental pollutant mitigation, and energy process analysis. It welcomes original papers, review articles, technical notes, and letters to the editor. Authors are encouraged to submit manuscripts that bridge the gap between research, development, and implementation. The journal addresses a wide spectrum of topics, including fossil and renewable energy technologies, energy economics, and environmental impacts. Applied Energy also explores modeling and forecasting, conservation strategies, and the social and economic implications of energy policies, including climate change mitigation. It is complemented by the open-access journal Advances in Applied Energy.
期刊最新文献
Privacy-preserving transfer learning framework for building energy forecasting with fully anonymized data Robust Koopman EMPC for optimal frequency regulation of VSC-MTDC systems Operational decision of wind–photovoltaic–energy storage integrated system in day-ahead and ancillary service joint market considering weather variability Collaborative governance of carbon mitigation, energy transition, and material management: A factorial non-deterministic carbon-energy-metal nexus optimization model Systematic under-representation of ERA5 10 m wind speeds in the ERA5-land product undermines wind energy studies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1