Safety on the Line: Examining the impacts of crosswalk design on Child’s perceived Safety, cautious Behavior, and visual attention with VR Technology

IF 5.7 1区 工程技术 Q1 ERGONOMICS Accident; analysis and prevention Pub Date : 2025-02-13 DOI:10.1016/j.aap.2025.107959
Chaeseung Lee, Hyunseong Yun, Junseung Lee, Seung-Nam Kim
{"title":"Safety on the Line: Examining the impacts of crosswalk design on Child’s perceived Safety, cautious Behavior, and visual attention with VR Technology","authors":"Chaeseung Lee,&nbsp;Hyunseong Yun,&nbsp;Junseung Lee,&nbsp;Seung-Nam Kim","doi":"10.1016/j.aap.2025.107959","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Although children are particularly vulnerable to accidents while crossing a street, knowledge about their specific perceptual and behavioral responses to crosswalk design and conditions is limited. By employing simulated virtual reality (VR) experiments, this study investigated how the environment of an unsignalized T-junction in a school zone influenced the perceived safety, crossing behaviors, and visual attention of 178 participants, consisting of younger (aged 8–10) and older children (aged 11–12) and their parents. Key findings from cross-classified multilevel, trajectory, and counterfactual analyses using Reproduced Virtual Experiment Data (CARVED) techniques for viewed scene comparisons are as follows. First, despite their physical and cognitive limitations, children—particularly younger ones—exhibited fewer attentive behaviors on sidewalks and roadways, along with a higher informal crossing ratio than parents. Second, responses to environmental conditions varied by developmental stage. While older children and parents generally responded to hazardous conditions with increased caution, younger children exhibited minimal behavioral adjustments. For example, parents perceived environments with parked cars as less safe and demonstrated more attentive and preventive behaviors on roadways. In contrast, younger children, despite having their line of sight obstructed, failed to recognize these hazards and did not adopt compensatory strategies, reinforcing their vulnerability. Similarly, only older children and parents perceived decorative crosswalk patterns as less safe than traditional ones. Third, while traditional crosswalks facilitated orthogonal crossings and provided clearer guidance for safer movements, decorative patterns often encouraged diagonal and dispersed crossings, resulting in a higher jaywalking ratio. Lastly, speed limits showed no significant influence on perceived safety or crossing behaviors. These findings highlight the critical influence of developmental stages on safety perceptions and behaviors, emphasizing the need to reassess crosswalk designs and address visibility challenges caused by illegal on-street parking to enhance child pedestrian safety.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":6926,"journal":{"name":"Accident; analysis and prevention","volume":"213 ","pages":"Article 107959"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accident; analysis and prevention","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001457525000454","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ERGONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although children are particularly vulnerable to accidents while crossing a street, knowledge about their specific perceptual and behavioral responses to crosswalk design and conditions is limited. By employing simulated virtual reality (VR) experiments, this study investigated how the environment of an unsignalized T-junction in a school zone influenced the perceived safety, crossing behaviors, and visual attention of 178 participants, consisting of younger (aged 8–10) and older children (aged 11–12) and their parents. Key findings from cross-classified multilevel, trajectory, and counterfactual analyses using Reproduced Virtual Experiment Data (CARVED) techniques for viewed scene comparisons are as follows. First, despite their physical and cognitive limitations, children—particularly younger ones—exhibited fewer attentive behaviors on sidewalks and roadways, along with a higher informal crossing ratio than parents. Second, responses to environmental conditions varied by developmental stage. While older children and parents generally responded to hazardous conditions with increased caution, younger children exhibited minimal behavioral adjustments. For example, parents perceived environments with parked cars as less safe and demonstrated more attentive and preventive behaviors on roadways. In contrast, younger children, despite having their line of sight obstructed, failed to recognize these hazards and did not adopt compensatory strategies, reinforcing their vulnerability. Similarly, only older children and parents perceived decorative crosswalk patterns as less safe than traditional ones. Third, while traditional crosswalks facilitated orthogonal crossings and provided clearer guidance for safer movements, decorative patterns often encouraged diagonal and dispersed crossings, resulting in a higher jaywalking ratio. Lastly, speed limits showed no significant influence on perceived safety or crossing behaviors. These findings highlight the critical influence of developmental stages on safety perceptions and behaviors, emphasizing the need to reassess crosswalk designs and address visibility challenges caused by illegal on-street parking to enhance child pedestrian safety.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.90
自引率
16.90%
发文量
264
审稿时长
48 days
期刊介绍: Accident Analysis & Prevention provides wide coverage of the general areas relating to accidental injury and damage, including the pre-injury and immediate post-injury phases. Published papers deal with medical, legal, economic, educational, behavioral, theoretical or empirical aspects of transportation accidents, as well as with accidents at other sites. Selected topics within the scope of the Journal may include: studies of human, environmental and vehicular factors influencing the occurrence, type and severity of accidents and injury; the design, implementation and evaluation of countermeasures; biomechanics of impact and human tolerance limits to injury; modelling and statistical analysis of accident data; policy, planning and decision-making in safety.
期刊最新文献
Safety on the Line: Examining the impacts of crosswalk design on Child’s perceived Safety, cautious Behavior, and visual attention with VR Technology Classification of driving simulators validation: A case study using an immersive driving simulator Probabilistic modelling of optimal placement strategies of hazardous materials railcars in freight trains Bayesian survival analysis of interactions between truck platoons and surrounding vehicles through a two-dimensional surrogate safety measure Spatial heterogeneity effect of built environment on traffic safety using geographically weighted atrous convolutions neural network
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1