Luigi Operato , Andrea Gallo , Erika Amaranta Eva Marino , Daniele Mattioli
{"title":"Navigating CSRD reporting: Turning compliance into sustainable development with science-based metrics","authors":"Luigi Operato , Andrea Gallo , Erika Amaranta Eva Marino , Daniele Mattioli","doi":"10.1016/j.envdev.2025.101138","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This manuscript explores how organizations can adapt to the new EU sustainability regulations, specifically focusing on the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD). It highlights the distinct approaches to sustainability in academia and industry, and the role of regulatory governance in bridging these perspectives to promote sustainable practices. We argue that compliance with the CSRD requires a structured framework to guide sustainability assessments, ensuring reliability, comprehensiveness, manageability, and transparency. These principles support the creation of quantitative metrics for sustainability reporting, facilitating third-party verification and integrating sustainability into corporate governance. Key findings include the strategic benefits of using science-based metrics for sustainable business development and long-term value creation. The proposed framework enables reaching these benefits by balancing methodological rigor with contextual relevance. Hence, it bridges the gap between regulatory compliance and strategic business development. The adoption of a forward-looking approach not only ensures compliance but also enables leveraging sustainability reporting as a tool for strategic planning. While the framework introduces key principles to guide the sustainability assessment, further research is needed to develop specific guidelines and tools to facilitate the implementation of the proposed principles in the organizational contexts.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54269,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Development","volume":"54 ","pages":"Article 101138"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Development","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211464525000041","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This manuscript explores how organizations can adapt to the new EU sustainability regulations, specifically focusing on the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD). It highlights the distinct approaches to sustainability in academia and industry, and the role of regulatory governance in bridging these perspectives to promote sustainable practices. We argue that compliance with the CSRD requires a structured framework to guide sustainability assessments, ensuring reliability, comprehensiveness, manageability, and transparency. These principles support the creation of quantitative metrics for sustainability reporting, facilitating third-party verification and integrating sustainability into corporate governance. Key findings include the strategic benefits of using science-based metrics for sustainable business development and long-term value creation. The proposed framework enables reaching these benefits by balancing methodological rigor with contextual relevance. Hence, it bridges the gap between regulatory compliance and strategic business development. The adoption of a forward-looking approach not only ensures compliance but also enables leveraging sustainability reporting as a tool for strategic planning. While the framework introduces key principles to guide the sustainability assessment, further research is needed to develop specific guidelines and tools to facilitate the implementation of the proposed principles in the organizational contexts.
期刊介绍:
Environmental Development provides a future oriented, pro-active, authoritative source of information and learning for researchers, postgraduate students, policymakers, and managers, and bridges the gap between fundamental research and the application in management and policy practices. It stimulates the exchange and coupling of traditional scientific knowledge on the environment, with the experiential knowledge among decision makers and other stakeholders and also connects natural sciences and social and behavioral sciences. Environmental Development includes and promotes scientific work from the non-western world, and also strengthens the collaboration between the developed and developing world. Further it links environmental research to broader issues of economic and social-cultural developments, and is intended to shorten the delays between research and publication, while ensuring thorough peer review. Environmental Development also creates a forum for transnational communication, discussion and global action.
Environmental Development is open to a broad range of disciplines and authors. The journal welcomes, in particular, contributions from a younger generation of researchers, and papers expanding the frontiers of environmental sciences, pointing at new directions and innovative answers.
All submissions to Environmental Development are reviewed using the general criteria of quality, originality, precision, importance of topic and insights, clarity of exposition, which are in keeping with the journal''s aims and scope.