Navigating CSRD reporting: Turning compliance into sustainable development with science-based metrics

IF 4.7 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Environmental Development Pub Date : 2025-01-23 DOI:10.1016/j.envdev.2025.101138
Luigi Operato , Andrea Gallo , Erika Amaranta Eva Marino , Daniele Mattioli
{"title":"Navigating CSRD reporting: Turning compliance into sustainable development with science-based metrics","authors":"Luigi Operato ,&nbsp;Andrea Gallo ,&nbsp;Erika Amaranta Eva Marino ,&nbsp;Daniele Mattioli","doi":"10.1016/j.envdev.2025.101138","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This manuscript explores how organizations can adapt to the new EU sustainability regulations, specifically focusing on the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD). It highlights the distinct approaches to sustainability in academia and industry, and the role of regulatory governance in bridging these perspectives to promote sustainable practices. We argue that compliance with the CSRD requires a structured framework to guide sustainability assessments, ensuring reliability, comprehensiveness, manageability, and transparency. These principles support the creation of quantitative metrics for sustainability reporting, facilitating third-party verification and integrating sustainability into corporate governance. Key findings include the strategic benefits of using science-based metrics for sustainable business development and long-term value creation. The proposed framework enables reaching these benefits by balancing methodological rigor with contextual relevance. Hence, it bridges the gap between regulatory compliance and strategic business development. The adoption of a forward-looking approach not only ensures compliance but also enables leveraging sustainability reporting as a tool for strategic planning. While the framework introduces key principles to guide the sustainability assessment, further research is needed to develop specific guidelines and tools to facilitate the implementation of the proposed principles in the organizational contexts.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54269,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Development","volume":"54 ","pages":"Article 101138"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Development","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211464525000041","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This manuscript explores how organizations can adapt to the new EU sustainability regulations, specifically focusing on the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD). It highlights the distinct approaches to sustainability in academia and industry, and the role of regulatory governance in bridging these perspectives to promote sustainable practices. We argue that compliance with the CSRD requires a structured framework to guide sustainability assessments, ensuring reliability, comprehensiveness, manageability, and transparency. These principles support the creation of quantitative metrics for sustainability reporting, facilitating third-party verification and integrating sustainability into corporate governance. Key findings include the strategic benefits of using science-based metrics for sustainable business development and long-term value creation. The proposed framework enables reaching these benefits by balancing methodological rigor with contextual relevance. Hence, it bridges the gap between regulatory compliance and strategic business development. The adoption of a forward-looking approach not only ensures compliance but also enables leveraging sustainability reporting as a tool for strategic planning. While the framework introduces key principles to guide the sustainability assessment, further research is needed to develop specific guidelines and tools to facilitate the implementation of the proposed principles in the organizational contexts.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Development
Environmental Development Social Sciences-Geography, Planning and Development
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
1.90%
发文量
62
审稿时长
74 days
期刊介绍: Environmental Development provides a future oriented, pro-active, authoritative source of information and learning for researchers, postgraduate students, policymakers, and managers, and bridges the gap between fundamental research and the application in management and policy practices. It stimulates the exchange and coupling of traditional scientific knowledge on the environment, with the experiential knowledge among decision makers and other stakeholders and also connects natural sciences and social and behavioral sciences. Environmental Development includes and promotes scientific work from the non-western world, and also strengthens the collaboration between the developed and developing world. Further it links environmental research to broader issues of economic and social-cultural developments, and is intended to shorten the delays between research and publication, while ensuring thorough peer review. Environmental Development also creates a forum for transnational communication, discussion and global action. Environmental Development is open to a broad range of disciplines and authors. The journal welcomes, in particular, contributions from a younger generation of researchers, and papers expanding the frontiers of environmental sciences, pointing at new directions and innovative answers. All submissions to Environmental Development are reviewed using the general criteria of quality, originality, precision, importance of topic and insights, clarity of exposition, which are in keeping with the journal''s aims and scope.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Harmonizing tourism and conservation through payment for ecosystem services: A case study of Gili Matra, Indonesia Trends and impacts of climate-induced extreme weather events in South Africa (1920–2023) Building cleaner communities in equatorial Africa: Road upgrades and household waste management in northern Benin Life cycle assessment of black tea production and consumption in Türkiye: Insights from waste management scenarios
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1