Towards inclusion through polyculturalism: A critical review of cultural hybridity

IF 2.8 2区 社会学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL International Journal of Intercultural Relations Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-12 DOI:10.1016/j.ijintrel.2025.102155
Sasha Valgardsson , Luciara Nardon
{"title":"Towards inclusion through polyculturalism: A critical review of cultural hybridity","authors":"Sasha Valgardsson ,&nbsp;Luciara Nardon","doi":"10.1016/j.ijintrel.2025.102155","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>High levels of global migration have increased the complexity of the relationship between individuals and cultures. <em>Multiculturalism</em> has emerged as a prominent ideology to support inclusion by calling for the recognition and celebration of cultural differences and inviting cultural groups to maintain their distinctive cultural identities. Assuming cultural influences to be constant, general, categorical, and steady, the multicultural ideology may inadvertently exclude individuals positioned in-between cultures, not quite identifying with either culture but settling in hybridity. <em>Polyculturalism</em> has recently emerged as an alternative ideology arguing that cultural influences are dynamic, situated, partial, and plural. This paper critically reviews existing interdisciplinary literature to better understand individual outcomes of early immersive cultural mixing as a revelatory case of cultural hybridity and discuss the impact of the multiculturalism ideology on cultural inclusion and belonging of this population. We propose a polycultural mindset—cultural self-awareness embracing hybridity, plurality, and partiality; openness to other cultures and cultural compositions; and openness to the dynamic change of cultures and cultural associations in self and others—as an alternative to fostering an enhanced sense of belonging. We contribute a more nuanced understanding of the influence of multiple cultures on individuals and discuss the implications of adopting a polycultural ideology and mindset on social inclusion.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48216,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Intercultural Relations","volume":"105 ","pages":"Article 102155"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Intercultural Relations","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0147176725000185","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

High levels of global migration have increased the complexity of the relationship between individuals and cultures. Multiculturalism has emerged as a prominent ideology to support inclusion by calling for the recognition and celebration of cultural differences and inviting cultural groups to maintain their distinctive cultural identities. Assuming cultural influences to be constant, general, categorical, and steady, the multicultural ideology may inadvertently exclude individuals positioned in-between cultures, not quite identifying with either culture but settling in hybridity. Polyculturalism has recently emerged as an alternative ideology arguing that cultural influences are dynamic, situated, partial, and plural. This paper critically reviews existing interdisciplinary literature to better understand individual outcomes of early immersive cultural mixing as a revelatory case of cultural hybridity and discuss the impact of the multiculturalism ideology on cultural inclusion and belonging of this population. We propose a polycultural mindset—cultural self-awareness embracing hybridity, plurality, and partiality; openness to other cultures and cultural compositions; and openness to the dynamic change of cultures and cultural associations in self and others—as an alternative to fostering an enhanced sense of belonging. We contribute a more nuanced understanding of the influence of multiple cultures on individuals and discuss the implications of adopting a polycultural ideology and mindset on social inclusion.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从多元文化主义走向包容:对文化混杂的批判性回顾
高水平的全球移民增加了个人与文化之间关系的复杂性。多元文化主义已成为一种支持包容的重要意识形态,它呼吁承认和庆祝文化差异,并邀请文化群体保持其独特的文化身份。假设文化影响是恒定的、普遍的、绝对的和稳定的,多元文化意识形态可能会无意中排除处于文化之间的个人,不完全认同任何一种文化,而是在混杂中定居。多元文化主义最近作为另一种意识形态出现,认为文化影响是动态的、定位的、局部的和多元的。本文批判性地回顾了现有的跨学科文献,以更好地理解早期沉浸式文化混合的个体结果,作为文化混杂的一个启示性案例,并讨论多元文化主义意识形态对这一人群的文化包容和归属感的影响。我们提出一种多元文化的心态——包括混杂性、多元性和偏见的文化自我意识;对其他文化和文化构成持开放态度;对文化的动态变化以及自我和他人的文化联系持开放态度——作为培养增强归属感的一种选择。我们对多元文化对个人的影响有了更细致的理解,并讨论了采用多元文化意识形态和心态对社会包容的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
14.30%
发文量
122
期刊介绍: IJIR is dedicated to advancing knowledge and understanding of theory, practice, and research in intergroup relations. The contents encompass theoretical developments, field-based evaluations of training techniques, empirical discussions of cultural similarities and differences, and critical descriptions of new training approaches. Papers selected for publication in IJIR are judged to increase our understanding of intergroup tensions and harmony. Issue-oriented and cross-discipline discussion is encouraged. The highest priority is given to manuscripts that join theory, practice, and field research design. By theory, we mean conceptual schemes focused on the nature of cultural differences and similarities.
期刊最新文献
Resilience in the face of crisis: Community and individual resilience in large and small jewish communities in Brazil Post-October 7, 2023, attack Reciprocal adaptation as synergistic support for international secondary students in Canada Cross-regional acculturative stress and mental well-being among undergraduate students in China “Do I fit in here?” How immigrants’ endorsement of social markers is related to their wellbeing in three migrant receiving societies Why we became targets: Bullying victimization attributions across collectivist and individualist contexts
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1