Responses of soil greenhouse gas fluxes to land management in forests and grasslands: A global meta-analysis

IF 8.2 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Science of the Total Environment Pub Date : 2025-02-13 DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2025.178773
Huanhuan Liu , Yuqi Miao , Yu Chen , Yifan Shen , Yongfa You , Zhuonan Wang , Chengcheng Gang
{"title":"Responses of soil greenhouse gas fluxes to land management in forests and grasslands: A global meta-analysis","authors":"Huanhuan Liu ,&nbsp;Yuqi Miao ,&nbsp;Yu Chen ,&nbsp;Yifan Shen ,&nbsp;Yongfa You ,&nbsp;Zhuonan Wang ,&nbsp;Chengcheng Gang","doi":"10.1016/j.scitotenv.2025.178773","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Land management practices significantly influence soil greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Despite individual measurements of the impacts of forest and grassland ecosystem management practices (FGEM) on GHG emissions, a comprehensive global-scale synthesis and comparison remain absent. In this study, a global meta-analysis was conducted to analyze the responses of three key soil GHGs, including carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>), methane (CH<sub>4</sub>), and nitrous oxide (N<sub>2</sub>O), to various FGEM, including forest burning (FB) and thinning (FT), grassland grazing (GG), fencing (GF), and mowing (GM) based on 1643 observations from 317 individual studies. Moderator factors and the underlying mechanisms driving these responses were also explored. Results revealed that in managed forests, FB significantly reduced soil CO<sub>2</sub> and N<sub>2</sub>O emissions, while FT decreased soil CH<sub>4</sub> uptake capacity without affecting CO<sub>2</sub> and N<sub>2</sub>O emissions. In managed grasslands, GG reduced soil CO<sub>2</sub> emission, while GF increased it; both had neutral impacts on soil CH<sub>4</sub> and N<sub>2</sub>O fluxes. GM did not affect GHG fluxes. Overall, forest management decreased soil CO<sub>2</sub> emission and CH<sub>4</sub> uptake capacity, whereas grassland management had a neutral effect on soil GHG fluxes. Temporal analysis revealed diminishing effects of FGEM on CO<sub>2</sub> emissions over the long term. Soil CH<sub>4</sub> uptake exhibited divergent responses over time, and soil N<sub>2</sub>O emissions remained relatively constant. Compared to managed grassland, soil GHG fluxes in managed forests were more sensitive to aridity conditions, with forest management generally restraining soil CO<sub>2</sub> and N<sub>2</sub>O emissions and CH<sub>4</sub> uptake in humid regions. Meta-regression analysis highlighted carbon content, soil temperature, and soil moisture as primary drives of changes in soil CO<sub>2</sub> and CH<sub>4</sub> fluxes, while soil N<sub>2</sub>O fluxes were more susceptible to soil organic carbon and microbial biomass nitrogen. The dependence of soil GHG fluxes on climate zones and management duration should be integrated into Earth system models for more accurate predictions of the impact of human interference.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":422,"journal":{"name":"Science of the Total Environment","volume":"967 ","pages":"Article 178773"},"PeriodicalIF":8.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science of the Total Environment","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048969725004085","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Land management practices significantly influence soil greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Despite individual measurements of the impacts of forest and grassland ecosystem management practices (FGEM) on GHG emissions, a comprehensive global-scale synthesis and comparison remain absent. In this study, a global meta-analysis was conducted to analyze the responses of three key soil GHGs, including carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), and nitrous oxide (N2O), to various FGEM, including forest burning (FB) and thinning (FT), grassland grazing (GG), fencing (GF), and mowing (GM) based on 1643 observations from 317 individual studies. Moderator factors and the underlying mechanisms driving these responses were also explored. Results revealed that in managed forests, FB significantly reduced soil CO2 and N2O emissions, while FT decreased soil CH4 uptake capacity without affecting CO2 and N2O emissions. In managed grasslands, GG reduced soil CO2 emission, while GF increased it; both had neutral impacts on soil CH4 and N2O fluxes. GM did not affect GHG fluxes. Overall, forest management decreased soil CO2 emission and CH4 uptake capacity, whereas grassland management had a neutral effect on soil GHG fluxes. Temporal analysis revealed diminishing effects of FGEM on CO2 emissions over the long term. Soil CH4 uptake exhibited divergent responses over time, and soil N2O emissions remained relatively constant. Compared to managed grassland, soil GHG fluxes in managed forests were more sensitive to aridity conditions, with forest management generally restraining soil CO2 and N2O emissions and CH4 uptake in humid regions. Meta-regression analysis highlighted carbon content, soil temperature, and soil moisture as primary drives of changes in soil CO2 and CH4 fluxes, while soil N2O fluxes were more susceptible to soil organic carbon and microbial biomass nitrogen. The dependence of soil GHG fluxes on climate zones and management duration should be integrated into Earth system models for more accurate predictions of the impact of human interference.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Science of the Total Environment
Science of the Total Environment 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
17.60
自引率
10.20%
发文量
8726
审稿时长
2.4 months
期刊介绍: The Science of the Total Environment is an international journal dedicated to scientific research on the environment and its interaction with humanity. It covers a wide range of disciplines and seeks to publish innovative, hypothesis-driven, and impactful research that explores the entire environment, including the atmosphere, lithosphere, hydrosphere, biosphere, and anthroposphere. The journal's updated Aims & Scope emphasizes the importance of interdisciplinary environmental research with broad impact. Priority is given to studies that advance fundamental understanding and explore the interconnectedness of multiple environmental spheres. Field studies are preferred, while laboratory experiments must demonstrate significant methodological advancements or mechanistic insights with direct relevance to the environment.
期刊最新文献
Association between exposure to brominated flame retardants and atherosclerosis: Evidence for inflammatory status as a potential mediator Methodologic insights aimed to set-up an innovative Laser Direct InfraRed (LDIR)-based method for the detection and characterization of microplastics in wastewaters Sociodemographic factors and vulnerability to multiple extreme weather events: A national study in the U.S. Responses of soil greenhouse gas fluxes to land management in forests and grasslands: A global meta-analysis Behavioral and physiological effects of difenoconazole on stingless bees: A multi-species analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1