Mechanisms and outcomes of a very low intensity intervention to improve parental acknowledgement and understanding of childhood overweight/obesity, embedded in the National Child Measurement Programme: A sub-study within a large cluster Randomized Controlled Trial (MapMe2)

IF 3.5 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL British Journal of Health Psychology Pub Date : 2025-02-13 DOI:10.1111/bjhp.12784
Elizabeth H. Evans, Christopher M. Jones, Ashley Adamson, Angela R. Jones, Laura Basterfield, João Paulo de Aguiar Greca, Letitia Sermin-Reed, Maddey Patterson, Lorraine McSweeney, Raenhha Dhami, Louisa Ells, Alison Gahagan, Tomos Robinson, Mohadeseh Shojaei Shahrokhabadi, Dawn Teare, Martin J. Tovée, Vera Araújo Soares
{"title":"Mechanisms and outcomes of a very low intensity intervention to improve parental acknowledgement and understanding of childhood overweight/obesity, embedded in the National Child Measurement Programme: A sub-study within a large cluster Randomized Controlled Trial (MapMe2)","authors":"Elizabeth H. Evans,&nbsp;Christopher M. Jones,&nbsp;Ashley Adamson,&nbsp;Angela R. Jones,&nbsp;Laura Basterfield,&nbsp;João Paulo de Aguiar Greca,&nbsp;Letitia Sermin-Reed,&nbsp;Maddey Patterson,&nbsp;Lorraine McSweeney,&nbsp;Raenhha Dhami,&nbsp;Louisa Ells,&nbsp;Alison Gahagan,&nbsp;Tomos Robinson,&nbsp;Mohadeseh Shojaei Shahrokhabadi,&nbsp;Dawn Teare,&nbsp;Martin J. Tovée,&nbsp;Vera Araújo Soares","doi":"10.1111/bjhp.12784","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>Parental underdetection of child underweight and overweight/obesity may negatively affect children's longer-term health. We examined psychological/behavioural mechanisms of a very low-intensity intervention to improve acknowledgement and understanding of child weight after feedback from a school-based weight monitoring programme.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Design</h3>\n \n <p>This sub-study was nested within a larger 3-arm cluster-RCT (1:1:1; <i>N</i> = 57,300). Parents in all groups received written postal feedback on their child's weight classification. Intervention participants received an enhanced feedback letter with computer-generated photorealistic images depicting children of different weight classifications, and access to a website about supporting healthy weight, once (intervention one) or twice (intervention two; repeated 6 months after first ‘dose’).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A quantitative process and outcome evaluation using baseline and 12-month BMI <i>z</i>-scores of an opt-in sub-sample of 502 children aged 4–5 and 10–11. Children completed dietary reports, used accelerometers (MVPA), and self-reported self-esteem; 10–11-year-olds also self-reported quality of life and dietary restraint. Parents reported perceptions of child's weight classification, and their intentions, self-efficacy, action planning and coping planning for child physical activity, dietary intake; parents of 4–5-year-olds reported their child's quality of life.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Neither intervention differentially improved parental acknowledgement or understanding of weight classification at follow-up, although parents in all groups reported better acknowledgement after receiving feedback. The interventions did not affect behavioural/psychological determinants, weight outcomes, children's self-esteem, dietary restraint or quality of life.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The interventions neither improved parental acknowledgement of child weight, child BMI <i>z</i>-scores and their psychological/behavioural determinants, nor worsened psycho-social sequelae.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48161,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Health Psychology","volume":"30 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/bjhp.12784","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Health Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bjhp.12784","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

Parental underdetection of child underweight and overweight/obesity may negatively affect children's longer-term health. We examined psychological/behavioural mechanisms of a very low-intensity intervention to improve acknowledgement and understanding of child weight after feedback from a school-based weight monitoring programme.

Design

This sub-study was nested within a larger 3-arm cluster-RCT (1:1:1; N = 57,300). Parents in all groups received written postal feedback on their child's weight classification. Intervention participants received an enhanced feedback letter with computer-generated photorealistic images depicting children of different weight classifications, and access to a website about supporting healthy weight, once (intervention one) or twice (intervention two; repeated 6 months after first ‘dose’).

Methods

A quantitative process and outcome evaluation using baseline and 12-month BMI z-scores of an opt-in sub-sample of 502 children aged 4–5 and 10–11. Children completed dietary reports, used accelerometers (MVPA), and self-reported self-esteem; 10–11-year-olds also self-reported quality of life and dietary restraint. Parents reported perceptions of child's weight classification, and their intentions, self-efficacy, action planning and coping planning for child physical activity, dietary intake; parents of 4–5-year-olds reported their child's quality of life.

Results

Neither intervention differentially improved parental acknowledgement or understanding of weight classification at follow-up, although parents in all groups reported better acknowledgement after receiving feedback. The interventions did not affect behavioural/psychological determinants, weight outcomes, children's self-esteem, dietary restraint or quality of life.

Conclusions

The interventions neither improved parental acknowledgement of child weight, child BMI z-scores and their psychological/behavioural determinants, nor worsened psycho-social sequelae.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在国家儿童测量计划中嵌入一项强度极低的干预措施,以提高家长对儿童超重/肥胖问题的认识和理解,其机制和结果如何?大型群组随机对照试验(MapMe2)中的一项子研究
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
British Journal of Health Psychology
British Journal of Health Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
14.10
自引率
1.30%
发文量
58
期刊介绍: The focus of the British Journal of Health Psychology is to publish original research on various aspects of psychology that are related to health, health-related behavior, and illness throughout a person's life. The journal specifically seeks articles that are based on health psychology theory or discuss theoretical matters within the field.
期刊最新文献
Mechanisms and outcomes of a very low intensity intervention to improve parental acknowledgement and understanding of childhood overweight/obesity, embedded in the National Child Measurement Programme: A sub-study within a large cluster Randomized Controlled Trial (MapMe2) Explaining the self-regulatory role of affect in identity theory: The role of self-compassion Why do most people on dialysis not accept psychological care to increase perceptions of control in life? The association between depressive symptoms and lower urinary tract symptoms and impact among women: Investigating behavioural, cognitive and physiological pathways Associations between lifestyle and well-being in early and late pregnancy in women with overweight or obesity: Secondary analyses of the PEARS RCT
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1