A DiRECT approach to weight loss in a culturally diverse, low-income population: Pilot randomised controlled trial and meta-analysis of similar interventions.

IF 5.4 2区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism Pub Date : 2025-02-11 DOI:10.1111/dom.16240
Kate Campbell, Natalie Ashton, Meredith C Peddie, Kim Ma'ia'i, Justine Camp, Jim Mann, Andrew N Reynolds
{"title":"A DiRECT approach to weight loss in a culturally diverse, low-income population: Pilot randomised controlled trial and meta-analysis of similar interventions.","authors":"Kate Campbell, Natalie Ashton, Meredith C Peddie, Kim Ma'ia'i, Justine Camp, Jim Mann, Andrew N Reynolds","doi":"10.1111/dom.16240","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To consider an intensive lifestyle intervention for weight loss in type 2 diabetes or prediabetes when delivered within a primary care service catering to indigenous (Māori), Pacific, refugee, and low-income clientele.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Adults with obesity, type 2 diabetes or prediabetes, and a desire to lose weight were randomised to dietitian-supported usual care or the Diabetes Remission Clinical Trial (DiRECT)-type intervention (3 months of total diet replacement followed by 9 months of food reintroduction and supported weight loss maintenance). Both interventions included equal dietetic support delivered within primary care. Primary outcome was weight loss at 3 and 12 months. We performed random-effects meta-analysis of body weight of existing DiRECT-type interventions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty participants were randomised to the dietitian-led DiRECT-type intervention or dietitian-supported usual care. At 3 months, weight loss among DiRECT-type intervention participants was -6.1 kg (95% CI -10.2, -2.0) greater than with dietetic support. At 12 months, this difference decreased to -3.8 kg (-7.6, -0.1) due to gradual weight loss with dietitian-supported usual care, not weight regain in DiRECT. Meta-analyses indicated -8.5 kg (-11.1, -5.9) and -6.0 kg (-8.4, -3.5) greater weight loss for DiRECT-type interventions than usual diabetes care (with or without dietary advice) at 3 and 12 months.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this pilot effectiveness trial, the DiRECT-type intervention generated clinically relevant and greater weight loss than dietitian-supported usual care at 3 and 12 months. These results align with the effect sizes generated by meta-analyses of existing DiRECT-type interventions, demonstrating the potential use of DiRECT-type approaches across a much broader spectrum of the population than previously considered including those with both type 2 and prediabetes. ACTRN12622000151730.</p>","PeriodicalId":158,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/dom.16240","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: To consider an intensive lifestyle intervention for weight loss in type 2 diabetes or prediabetes when delivered within a primary care service catering to indigenous (Māori), Pacific, refugee, and low-income clientele.

Materials and methods: Adults with obesity, type 2 diabetes or prediabetes, and a desire to lose weight were randomised to dietitian-supported usual care or the Diabetes Remission Clinical Trial (DiRECT)-type intervention (3 months of total diet replacement followed by 9 months of food reintroduction and supported weight loss maintenance). Both interventions included equal dietetic support delivered within primary care. Primary outcome was weight loss at 3 and 12 months. We performed random-effects meta-analysis of body weight of existing DiRECT-type interventions.

Results: Forty participants were randomised to the dietitian-led DiRECT-type intervention or dietitian-supported usual care. At 3 months, weight loss among DiRECT-type intervention participants was -6.1 kg (95% CI -10.2, -2.0) greater than with dietetic support. At 12 months, this difference decreased to -3.8 kg (-7.6, -0.1) due to gradual weight loss with dietitian-supported usual care, not weight regain in DiRECT. Meta-analyses indicated -8.5 kg (-11.1, -5.9) and -6.0 kg (-8.4, -3.5) greater weight loss for DiRECT-type interventions than usual diabetes care (with or without dietary advice) at 3 and 12 months.

Conclusions: In this pilot effectiveness trial, the DiRECT-type intervention generated clinically relevant and greater weight loss than dietitian-supported usual care at 3 and 12 months. These results align with the effect sizes generated by meta-analyses of existing DiRECT-type interventions, demonstrating the potential use of DiRECT-type approaches across a much broader spectrum of the population than previously considered including those with both type 2 and prediabetes. ACTRN12622000151730.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism
Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
6.90%
发文量
319
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism is primarily a journal of clinical and experimental pharmacology and therapeutics covering the interrelated areas of diabetes, obesity and metabolism. The journal prioritises high-quality original research that reports on the effects of new or existing therapies, including dietary, exercise and lifestyle (non-pharmacological) interventions, in any aspect of metabolic and endocrine disease, either in humans or animal and cellular systems. ‘Metabolism’ may relate to lipids, bone and drug metabolism, or broader aspects of endocrine dysfunction. Preclinical pharmacology, pharmacokinetic studies, meta-analyses and those addressing drug safety and tolerability are also highly suitable for publication in this journal. Original research may be published as a main paper or as a research letter.
期刊最新文献
Novel pharmacotherapies for weight loss: Understanding the role of incretins to enable weight loss and improved health outcomes. The real-life experiences of people living with overweight and obesity: A psychosocial perspective. Safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of GZR4, a novel once-weekly basal insulin, in healthy participants: A randomized trial. A DiRECT approach to weight loss in a culturally diverse, low-income population: Pilot randomised controlled trial and meta-analysis of similar interventions. Ranibizumab with luseogliflozin in type 2 diabetes with diabetic macular oedema: A randomised clinical trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1