Effects of changes to income tax and devolved benefits in Scotland on health inequalities: a modelling study.

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH European Journal of Public Health Pub Date : 2025-02-11 DOI:10.1093/eurpub/ckaf009
Elizabeth Richardson, David Walsh, Gerry McCartney, Andrew Pulford, Mark Robinson
{"title":"Effects of changes to income tax and devolved benefits in Scotland on health inequalities: a modelling study.","authors":"Elizabeth Richardson, David Walsh, Gerry McCartney, Andrew Pulford, Mark Robinson","doi":"10.1093/eurpub/ckaf009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There is a well-understood relationship between inequalities in income and health. We assessed how changes to income tax and social security-options recently devolved to the Scottish Government-could affect income and life expectancy inequalities. We used the microsimulation model UKMOD to estimate policies' effects on household income distribution by socioeconomic deprivation, compared to baseline (Scottish income tax schedule for 2022/23). We then used the 'Triple I' (Informing Interventions to reduce health Inequalities) scenario modelling approach to estimate mortality effects for the income changes and calculated inequalities in life expectancy at birth. Scenario health impacts were determined largely by how much money they gave or took from households in the most deprived areas. Policies that increased incomes for households in deprived areas tended to reduce inequalities in life expectancy. Although we found this also applied to tax-cutting policies that increased income inequality, our estimates did not account for the public spending cuts that these costly policies would necessitate and their likely widening effect on health inequalities. Combining the best-performing (i.e. greatest positive impact) revenue-generating and revenue-spending policies we modelled-tax increases targeted at high earners and a doubling the value of social security benefits-would generate net revenue while reducing income inequality by approximately 10% and inequalities in life expectancy by 8% to 9%, but sizeable inequalities would remain. A multifaceted approach based on combinations of policies-including, but not limited to, bolder income tax measures-is required to achieve meaningful reductions in inequalities.</p>","PeriodicalId":12059,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Public Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckaf009","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There is a well-understood relationship between inequalities in income and health. We assessed how changes to income tax and social security-options recently devolved to the Scottish Government-could affect income and life expectancy inequalities. We used the microsimulation model UKMOD to estimate policies' effects on household income distribution by socioeconomic deprivation, compared to baseline (Scottish income tax schedule for 2022/23). We then used the 'Triple I' (Informing Interventions to reduce health Inequalities) scenario modelling approach to estimate mortality effects for the income changes and calculated inequalities in life expectancy at birth. Scenario health impacts were determined largely by how much money they gave or took from households in the most deprived areas. Policies that increased incomes for households in deprived areas tended to reduce inequalities in life expectancy. Although we found this also applied to tax-cutting policies that increased income inequality, our estimates did not account for the public spending cuts that these costly policies would necessitate and their likely widening effect on health inequalities. Combining the best-performing (i.e. greatest positive impact) revenue-generating and revenue-spending policies we modelled-tax increases targeted at high earners and a doubling the value of social security benefits-would generate net revenue while reducing income inequality by approximately 10% and inequalities in life expectancy by 8% to 9%, but sizeable inequalities would remain. A multifaceted approach based on combinations of policies-including, but not limited to, bolder income tax measures-is required to achieve meaningful reductions in inequalities.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Public Health
European Journal of Public Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
2.30%
发文量
2039
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Public Health (EJPH) is a multidisciplinary journal aimed at attracting contributions from epidemiology, health services research, health economics, social sciences, management sciences, ethics and law, environmental health sciences, and other disciplines of relevance to public health. The journal provides a forum for discussion and debate of current international public health issues, with a focus on the European Region. Bi-monthly issues contain peer-reviewed original articles, editorials, commentaries, book reviews, news, letters to the editor, announcements of events, and various other features.
期刊最新文献
Effects of changes to income tax and devolved benefits in Scotland on health inequalities: a modelling study. Excess healthcare utilization and costs linked to chronic conditions: a comparative study of nine European countries. Women's physical health around live births and pregnancy losses: a longitudinal study. Evaluating the socioeconomic benefits of heat-health warning systems. Long-term health effects of a third-generation waste-to-energy plant: the experience of Turin (Italy).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1