Building evidences in Public Health Emergency Preparedness ("BePHEP" Project)-a systematic review.

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH International Journal for Equity in Health Pub Date : 2025-02-11 DOI:10.1186/s12939-025-02382-w
Michelangelo Mercogliano, Gloria Spatari, Chiara Noviello, Francesca Di Serafino, Maria Elisabetta Mormile, Giuseppa Granvillano, Annalisa Iagnemma, Riccardo Mimmo, Irene Schenone, Eleonora Raso, Andrea Sanna, Enrica Frasson, Veronica Gallinoro, Marcello Di Pumpo, Duha Shellah, Caterina Rizzo, Nunzio Zotti
{"title":"Building evidences in Public Health Emergency Preparedness (\"BePHEP\" Project)-a systematic review.","authors":"Michelangelo Mercogliano, Gloria Spatari, Chiara Noviello, Francesca Di Serafino, Maria Elisabetta Mormile, Giuseppa Granvillano, Annalisa Iagnemma, Riccardo Mimmo, Irene Schenone, Eleonora Raso, Andrea Sanna, Enrica Frasson, Veronica Gallinoro, Marcello Di Pumpo, Duha Shellah, Caterina Rizzo, Nunzio Zotti","doi":"10.1186/s12939-025-02382-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Humanitarian crises exacerbate the vulnerability of already fragile healthcare systems and significantly increase the risk of infectious disease outbreaks in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). This systematic review aims to evaluate strategies and interventions implemented in LMICs to prevent and manage infectious diseases outbreaks during humanitarian crises from 2018 to 2023.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive literature search was conducted across Scopus, PubMed, and Web of Science, adhering to the PRISMA guideline and the SPIDER framework to identify relevant studies. The review included studies published between 2018 and 2023 focusing on infectious disease prevention and management in LMICs during humanitarian crises. Study quality was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute checklist.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eleven studies were identified from 1,415 unique articles. These studies addressed diverse interventions, including vaccination campaigns, epidemiologic surveillance, and integrated health services. Cholera outbreaks in Haiti and Mozambique, triggered by gang violence, internal migration, and Cyclone Kenneth, were addressed through epidemiological surveillance, case management, WASH (Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene) service improvements, and oral vaccination campaigns. Mathematical models guided cholera vaccination in Thailand's refugee camps. In India, surveillance and rapid response measures successfully prevented infectious disease outbreaks during the Kumbh Mela gathering. The Philippines improved response times to climate-related disasters using point-of-care testing and spatial care pathways. Despite challenges in Yemen, evaluating malaria surveillance systems led to recommendations for integrating multiple systems. Uganda developed a national multi-hazard emergency plan incorporating vaccination, communication, and risk management, proving useful during the refugee crisis and Ebola outbreak. In South Sudan, integrating immunisation services into nutrition centres increased vaccination coverage among children. Nigeria experienced a rise in measles cases during armed conflicts despite vaccination efforts, while visual communication strategies improved SARS-CoV-2 vaccination rates.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These interventions highlight the importance of multimodal, targeted, and collaborative responses to address complex health crises without relying on unsustainable investments. Despite the effectiveness of these interventions, infrastructure limitations, insecurity, and logistical constraints were noted. These findings emphasize the need for adaptable and resilient healthcare systems and international collaboration to safeguard the right to health during complex humanitarian crises.</p>","PeriodicalId":13745,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Equity in Health","volume":"24 1","pages":"41"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11817627/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for Equity in Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-025-02382-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Humanitarian crises exacerbate the vulnerability of already fragile healthcare systems and significantly increase the risk of infectious disease outbreaks in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). This systematic review aims to evaluate strategies and interventions implemented in LMICs to prevent and manage infectious diseases outbreaks during humanitarian crises from 2018 to 2023.

Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted across Scopus, PubMed, and Web of Science, adhering to the PRISMA guideline and the SPIDER framework to identify relevant studies. The review included studies published between 2018 and 2023 focusing on infectious disease prevention and management in LMICs during humanitarian crises. Study quality was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute checklist.

Results: Eleven studies were identified from 1,415 unique articles. These studies addressed diverse interventions, including vaccination campaigns, epidemiologic surveillance, and integrated health services. Cholera outbreaks in Haiti and Mozambique, triggered by gang violence, internal migration, and Cyclone Kenneth, were addressed through epidemiological surveillance, case management, WASH (Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene) service improvements, and oral vaccination campaigns. Mathematical models guided cholera vaccination in Thailand's refugee camps. In India, surveillance and rapid response measures successfully prevented infectious disease outbreaks during the Kumbh Mela gathering. The Philippines improved response times to climate-related disasters using point-of-care testing and spatial care pathways. Despite challenges in Yemen, evaluating malaria surveillance systems led to recommendations for integrating multiple systems. Uganda developed a national multi-hazard emergency plan incorporating vaccination, communication, and risk management, proving useful during the refugee crisis and Ebola outbreak. In South Sudan, integrating immunisation services into nutrition centres increased vaccination coverage among children. Nigeria experienced a rise in measles cases during armed conflicts despite vaccination efforts, while visual communication strategies improved SARS-CoV-2 vaccination rates.

Conclusion: These interventions highlight the importance of multimodal, targeted, and collaborative responses to address complex health crises without relying on unsustainable investments. Despite the effectiveness of these interventions, infrastructure limitations, insecurity, and logistical constraints were noted. These findings emphasize the need for adaptable and resilient healthcare systems and international collaboration to safeguard the right to health during complex humanitarian crises.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
构建公共卫生应急准备证据(“BePHEP”项目)——系统综述。
人道主义危机加剧了本已脆弱的卫生保健系统的脆弱性,并大大增加了低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs)传染病暴发的风险。本系统综述旨在评估2018年至2023年人道主义危机期间中低收入国家为预防和管理传染病暴发而实施的战略和干预措施。方法:按照PRISMA指南和SPIDER框架,在Scopus、PubMed和Web of Science上进行综合文献检索,识别相关研究。该审查包括2018年至2023年期间发表的研究,重点关注人道主义危机期间中低收入国家的传染病预防和管理。研究质量采用乔安娜布里格斯研究所的检查表进行评估。结果:从1415篇独特的文章中鉴定出11项研究。这些研究涉及多种干预措施,包括疫苗接种运动、流行病学监测和综合卫生服务。通过流行病学监测、病例管理、改善水、环境卫生和个人卫生服务以及口服疫苗接种运动,解决了由帮派暴力、国内移徙和肯尼斯气旋引发的海地和莫桑比克霍乱疫情。数学模型指导了泰国难民营的霍乱疫苗接种。在印度,监测和快速反应措施成功地防止了大壶节期间传染病的爆发。菲律宾利用即时护理测试和空间护理路径改善了对气候相关灾害的响应时间。尽管在也门面临挑战,但对疟疾监测系统的评估导致了整合多个系统的建议。乌干达制定了一项包括疫苗接种、沟通和风险管理在内的国家多灾种应急计划,在难民危机和埃博拉疫情期间证明是有用的。在南苏丹,将免疫服务纳入营养中心提高了儿童的疫苗接种覆盖率。尽管尼日利亚努力接种疫苗,但在武装冲突期间麻疹病例有所上升,而视觉传播战略提高了SARS-CoV-2疫苗接种率。结论:这些干预措施突出了在不依赖不可持续投资的情况下,采取多模式、有针对性和合作性应对措施以应对复杂卫生危机的重要性。尽管这些干预措施有效,但人们注意到基础设施的限制、不安全和后勤方面的制约。这些调查结果强调,需要建立适应性强、具有复原力的卫生保健系统,并开展国际合作,以在复杂的人道主义危机期间保障健康权。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
4.20%
发文量
162
审稿时长
28 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal for Equity in Health is an Open Access, peer-reviewed, online journal presenting evidence relevant to the search for, and attainment of, equity in health across and within countries. International Journal for Equity in Health aims to improve the understanding of issues that influence the health of populations. This includes the discussion of political, policy-related, economic, social and health services-related influences, particularly with regard to systematic differences in distributions of one or more aspects of health in population groups defined demographically, geographically, or socially.
期刊最新文献
Effectiveness of an internet-based health examination model for focus populations in the Chinese community: a community demonstration trial. Transition to parenthood: parents' experiences of an extended home visiting programme in socioeconomically disadvantaged areas of Sweden. Why do people trust (or mistrust) health organizations? A systematic review. Exploring the use of translation technologies to overcome language barriers in mental healthcare: a qualitative cross-country study. Stigma experiences among Chinese middle-aged women with pelvic floor disorders: a qualitative study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1