Rebecca Mathews, Claudia Shen, Michael W Traeger, Helen M O'Brien, Christine Roder, Margaret E Hellard, Joseph S Doyle
{"title":"Enhancing Hepatitis C Virus Testing, Linkage to Care, and Treatment Commencement in Hospitals: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.","authors":"Rebecca Mathews, Claudia Shen, Michael W Traeger, Helen M O'Brien, Christine Roder, Margaret E Hellard, Joseph S Doyle","doi":"10.1093/ofid/ofaf056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The hospital-led interventions yielding the best hepatitis C virus (HCV) testing and treatment uptake are poorly understood.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases for studies assessing outcomes of hospital-led interventions for HCV antibody or RNA testing uptake, linkage to care, or direct-acting antiviral commencement compared with usual care, a historical comparator, or control group. We systematically reviewed hospital-led interventions delivered in inpatient units, outpatient clinics, or emergency departments. Random-effects meta-analysis estimated pooled odds ratios [pORs] measuring associations between interventions and outcomes. Subgroup analyses explored outcomes by intervention type.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 7872 abstracts were screened with 23 studies included. Twelve studies (222 868 participants) reported antibody testing uptake, 5 (n = 4987) reported RNA testing uptake, 7 (n = 3185) reported linkage to care, and 4 (n = 1344) reported treatment commencement. Hospital-led interventions were associated with increased antibody testing uptake (pOR, 5.83 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 2.49-13.61]; <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> = 99.9%), RNA testing uptake (pOR, 10.65 [95% CI, 1.70-66.50]; <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> = 97.9%), and linkage to care (pOR, 1.75 [95% CI, 1.10-2.79]; <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> = 79.9%) when data were pooled and assessed against comparators. Automated opt-out testing (5 studies: pOR, 16.13 [95% CI, 3.35-77.66]), reflex RNA testing (4 studies: pOR, 25.04 [95% CI, 3.63-172.7]), and care coordination and financial incentives (4 studies: pOR, 2.73 [95% CI, 1.85-4.03]) showed the greatest increases in antibody and RNA testing uptake and linkage to care, respectively. No intervention increased uptake at all care cascade steps.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Automated antibody and reflex RNA testing increase HCV testing uptake in hospitals but have limited impact on linkage to treatment. Other interventions promoting linkage must be explored.</p>","PeriodicalId":19517,"journal":{"name":"Open Forum Infectious Diseases","volume":"12 2","pages":"ofaf056"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11811904/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Forum Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaf056","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The hospital-led interventions yielding the best hepatitis C virus (HCV) testing and treatment uptake are poorly understood.
Methods: We searched Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases for studies assessing outcomes of hospital-led interventions for HCV antibody or RNA testing uptake, linkage to care, or direct-acting antiviral commencement compared with usual care, a historical comparator, or control group. We systematically reviewed hospital-led interventions delivered in inpatient units, outpatient clinics, or emergency departments. Random-effects meta-analysis estimated pooled odds ratios [pORs] measuring associations between interventions and outcomes. Subgroup analyses explored outcomes by intervention type.
Results: A total of 7872 abstracts were screened with 23 studies included. Twelve studies (222 868 participants) reported antibody testing uptake, 5 (n = 4987) reported RNA testing uptake, 7 (n = 3185) reported linkage to care, and 4 (n = 1344) reported treatment commencement. Hospital-led interventions were associated with increased antibody testing uptake (pOR, 5.83 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 2.49-13.61]; I2 = 99.9%), RNA testing uptake (pOR, 10.65 [95% CI, 1.70-66.50]; I2 = 97.9%), and linkage to care (pOR, 1.75 [95% CI, 1.10-2.79]; I2 = 79.9%) when data were pooled and assessed against comparators. Automated opt-out testing (5 studies: pOR, 16.13 [95% CI, 3.35-77.66]), reflex RNA testing (4 studies: pOR, 25.04 [95% CI, 3.63-172.7]), and care coordination and financial incentives (4 studies: pOR, 2.73 [95% CI, 1.85-4.03]) showed the greatest increases in antibody and RNA testing uptake and linkage to care, respectively. No intervention increased uptake at all care cascade steps.
Conclusions: Automated antibody and reflex RNA testing increase HCV testing uptake in hospitals but have limited impact on linkage to treatment. Other interventions promoting linkage must be explored.
期刊介绍：
Open Forum Infectious Diseases provides a global forum for the publication of clinical, translational, and basic research findings in a fully open access, online journal environment. The journal reflects the broad diversity of the field of infectious diseases, and focuses on the intersection of biomedical science and clinical practice, with a particular emphasis on knowledge that holds the potential to improve patient care in populations around the world. Fully peer-reviewed, OFID supports the international community of infectious diseases experts by providing a venue for articles that further the understanding of all aspects of infectious diseases.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
