Clinical and Mental Health Characteristics Among Patients Receiving Medications for OUD Treatment vs High-Dose Opioids When Referred for Pain Management.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY Pain Medicine Pub Date : 2025-02-12 DOI:10.1093/pm/pnaf011
Jie Yang, Melita Giummarra, Louisa Picco, Carolyn Arnold, Suzanne Nielsen
{"title":"Clinical and Mental Health Characteristics Among Patients Receiving Medications for OUD Treatment vs High-Dose Opioids When Referred for Pain Management.","authors":"Jie Yang, Melita Giummarra, Louisa Picco, Carolyn Arnold, Suzanne Nielsen","doi":"10.1093/pm/pnaf011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine the demographic and clinical characteristics of patients attending pain management services who were receiving opioid agonist treatment (ie, methadone or buprenorphine for the treatment of opioid use disorder) in comparison to those taking prescription opioid analgesics in oral morphine equivalent daily doses at low (<40 mg) and high doses (>100 mg) using a national database from the electronic Persistent Pain Outcomes Collaboration (ePPOC) in Australia.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A cross-sectional study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Australian pain services.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>Adult patients referred to Australian pain service clinics between 2016 and 2021.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Multinomial and bivariate logistic regression models were conducted to compare the demographic and clinical characteristics of patients on opioid agonist treatment and those taking other prescription opioid analgesics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 42,182 participants, most were female (56.8%), with a mean age of 51.7 years. People on opioid agonist treatment (n = 1,016) and high-dose opioids (n = 7,122) were similar in that they both had more severe mental health symptoms and longer pain duration, compared with the low-dose group (n = 20,517). Compared to the high-dose group, people on opioid agonist treatment had reduced odds of reporting more severe pain intensity, but increased odds of having multimorbidity, more severe anxiety and pain catastrophising thoughts.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings highlight the need for mental health treatment and the necessity of tailored multidisciplinary pain management for people in opioid agonist treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":19744,"journal":{"name":"Pain Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/pm/pnaf011","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To examine the demographic and clinical characteristics of patients attending pain management services who were receiving opioid agonist treatment (ie, methadone or buprenorphine for the treatment of opioid use disorder) in comparison to those taking prescription opioid analgesics in oral morphine equivalent daily doses at low (<40 mg) and high doses (>100 mg) using a national database from the electronic Persistent Pain Outcomes Collaboration (ePPOC) in Australia.

Design: A cross-sectional study.

Setting: Australian pain services.

Subjects: Adult patients referred to Australian pain service clinics between 2016 and 2021.

Methods: Multinomial and bivariate logistic regression models were conducted to compare the demographic and clinical characteristics of patients on opioid agonist treatment and those taking other prescription opioid analgesics.

Results: Among 42,182 participants, most were female (56.8%), with a mean age of 51.7 years. People on opioid agonist treatment (n = 1,016) and high-dose opioids (n = 7,122) were similar in that they both had more severe mental health symptoms and longer pain duration, compared with the low-dose group (n = 20,517). Compared to the high-dose group, people on opioid agonist treatment had reduced odds of reporting more severe pain intensity, but increased odds of having multimorbidity, more severe anxiety and pain catastrophising thoughts.

Conclusions: These findings highlight the need for mental health treatment and the necessity of tailored multidisciplinary pain management for people in opioid agonist treatment.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pain Medicine
Pain Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
3.20%
发文量
187
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Pain Medicine is a multi-disciplinary journal dedicated to pain clinicians, educators and researchers with an interest in pain from various medical specialties such as pain medicine, anaesthesiology, family practice, internal medicine, neurology, neurological surgery, orthopaedic spine surgery, psychiatry, and rehabilitation medicine as well as related health disciplines such as psychology, neuroscience, nursing, nurse practitioner, physical therapy, and integrative health.
期刊最新文献
Clinical and Mental Health Characteristics Among Patients Receiving Medications for OUD Treatment vs High-Dose Opioids When Referred for Pain Management. Comparison of Occupational Radiation Measurements in Interventional Pain Medicine Physicians Wearing Chest versus Hand Dosimeters: A Quality Improvement Study. Are Clinical, Psychophysical or Psychological Variables Helpful for Discriminating Patients with tension type headache? A diagnostic accuracy study. Systematic review and meta-analysis of conventional medical management in a patient population with refractory chronic pain suitable to receive a spinal cord stimulation system. Lessons Learned from the INTEGRATE-Pain Delphi Process to Develop Core Outcome Sets (COS) across the Pain Continuum.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1