Post-operative Pain Assessment in Shoulder Surgery: A Comparison amongst Healthcare Professionals.

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Pub Date : 2025-02-09 DOI:10.1016/j.jse.2024.12.038
Gregory Barlow, Brandon L Ziegenfuss, Sarah L Whitehouse, Kenneth Cutbush, Jashint Maharaj, Marine Launay, Ashish Gupta
{"title":"Post-operative Pain Assessment in Shoulder Surgery: A Comparison amongst Healthcare Professionals.","authors":"Gregory Barlow, Brandon L Ziegenfuss, Sarah L Whitehouse, Kenneth Cutbush, Jashint Maharaj, Marine Launay, Ashish Gupta","doi":"10.1016/j.jse.2024.12.038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The multidisciplinary health care model is integral for minimizing postoperative pain following shoulder surgery. Accordingly, the Australian and New Zealand College of Anaesthetists (ANZCA) stipulates that all health professionals involved in postoperative care require an adequate level of understanding in postoperative pain management<sup>14</sup>. However, no known peer-reviewed study investigates healthcare professionals' opinions regarding pain following shoulder surgery. This study aimed to assess the perception of patient postoperative pain and subsequent opioid use across medical practitioners, physiotherapists and nurses.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To address this aim, a 20-part questionnaire was developed to quantify the opinions of healthcare professionals regarding several shoulder surgery outcomes. The questionnaire utilized Visual Analogue Scales (VAS) to allow participants to quantify their subjective assessments of postoperative outcomes across five common types of shoulder procedures. Participants were recruited between 1 January 2021 and 31 December 2021 through contact with representatives from their affiliated organizations. Answers to pain-related questions were subsequently analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The questionnaire netted 200 responses, of which 132 were complete, and 68 were partial completions. Responses from nursing (35%), allied health (40%) and medical (23%) were included for analysis. Nursing participants assigned higher immediate postoperative pain scores and longer opioid usage following all five types of shoulder surgery, when compared to the values assigned by either physiotherapists or doctors (p<0.05). There is no statistically significant difference in immediate postoperative pain scores, or duration of opioid use assigned between doctors and physiotherapists (p>0.05 for all five types of shoulder procedures).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>When examined in the context of current peer-reviewed guidelines, the results of this study showed that all 3 study cohorts overestimated the duration of opioid requirement for all five types of shoulder surgeries assessed in this study - albeit to different degrees. These findings suggest the need for uniform education for doctors, nurses and physiotherapists regarding pain assessment and management immediately following shoulder surgery. While Australian guidelines are readily available online, the awareness of their existence may not be uniformed across all three professions - thus potentially accounting for the differences observed in this study.</p>","PeriodicalId":50051,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2024.12.038","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The multidisciplinary health care model is integral for minimizing postoperative pain following shoulder surgery. Accordingly, the Australian and New Zealand College of Anaesthetists (ANZCA) stipulates that all health professionals involved in postoperative care require an adequate level of understanding in postoperative pain management14. However, no known peer-reviewed study investigates healthcare professionals' opinions regarding pain following shoulder surgery. This study aimed to assess the perception of patient postoperative pain and subsequent opioid use across medical practitioners, physiotherapists and nurses.

Methods: To address this aim, a 20-part questionnaire was developed to quantify the opinions of healthcare professionals regarding several shoulder surgery outcomes. The questionnaire utilized Visual Analogue Scales (VAS) to allow participants to quantify their subjective assessments of postoperative outcomes across five common types of shoulder procedures. Participants were recruited between 1 January 2021 and 31 December 2021 through contact with representatives from their affiliated organizations. Answers to pain-related questions were subsequently analyzed.

Results: The questionnaire netted 200 responses, of which 132 were complete, and 68 were partial completions. Responses from nursing (35%), allied health (40%) and medical (23%) were included for analysis. Nursing participants assigned higher immediate postoperative pain scores and longer opioid usage following all five types of shoulder surgery, when compared to the values assigned by either physiotherapists or doctors (p<0.05). There is no statistically significant difference in immediate postoperative pain scores, or duration of opioid use assigned between doctors and physiotherapists (p>0.05 for all five types of shoulder procedures).

Conclusion: When examined in the context of current peer-reviewed guidelines, the results of this study showed that all 3 study cohorts overestimated the duration of opioid requirement for all five types of shoulder surgeries assessed in this study - albeit to different degrees. These findings suggest the need for uniform education for doctors, nurses and physiotherapists regarding pain assessment and management immediately following shoulder surgery. While Australian guidelines are readily available online, the awareness of their existence may not be uniformed across all three professions - thus potentially accounting for the differences observed in this study.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
23.30%
发文量
604
审稿时长
11.2 weeks
期刊介绍: The official publication for eight leading specialty organizations, this authoritative journal is the only publication to focus exclusively on medical, surgical, and physical techniques for treating injury/disease of the upper extremity, including the shoulder girdle, arm, and elbow. Clinically oriented and peer-reviewed, the Journal provides an international forum for the exchange of information on new techniques, instruments, and materials. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery features vivid photos, professional illustrations, and explicit diagrams that demonstrate surgical approaches and depict implant devices. Topics covered include fractures, dislocations, diseases and injuries of the rotator cuff, imaging techniques, arthritis, arthroscopy, arthroplasty, and rehabilitation.
期刊最新文献
Females Experience Inferior Outcomes and Higher Rates of Revisions and Complications Compared to Males Following Anatomic Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Return to Active Duty following Bankart Repair and Latarjet Procedure for Traumatic Anterior Shoulder Dislocation in a Military Population: a Single Center Retrospective Cohort Study. Revision rates and patient-reported outcomes after shoulder hemiarthroplasty versus anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty in patients younger than 60 years: a cohort study with data from the Dutch Arthroplasty Register (LROI). Does Cutibacterium Skin Load Impact the Outcomes of Primary Shoulder Arthroplasty? Post-operative Pain Assessment in Shoulder Surgery: A Comparison amongst Healthcare Professionals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1