Return to Active Duty following Bankart Repair and Latarjet Procedure for Traumatic Anterior Shoulder Dislocation in a Military Population: a Single Center Retrospective Cohort Study.

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Pub Date : 2025-02-10 DOI:10.1016/j.jse.2024.12.039
Sanne H van Spanning, Lukas P E Verweij, Theodore P van Iersel, Michel P J van den Bekerom, Derek van Deurzen, P Paul F M Kuijer, Sebastiaan Floor
{"title":"Return to Active Duty following Bankart Repair and Latarjet Procedure for Traumatic Anterior Shoulder Dislocation in a Military Population: a Single Center Retrospective Cohort Study.","authors":"Sanne H van Spanning, Lukas P E Verweij, Theodore P van Iersel, Michel P J van den Bekerom, Derek van Deurzen, P Paul F M Kuijer, Sebastiaan Floor","doi":"10.1016/j.jse.2024.12.039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Given that shoulder instability mostly affects young patients, it is likely that return to active duty (RTAD) is an important factor in the military population. However, knowledge on factors associated with failure to RTAD in this patient group following arthroscopic Bankart repair (ABR) and Latarjet is limited.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aims were to (1) assess RTAD rates following ABR and Latarjet (2) determine prognostic factors that are associated with failure to RTAD and (3) assess the degree of limitation in work performance due to shoulder complaints.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study was conducted including consecutive patients who underwent ABR or open Latarjet procedure to treat shoulder instability due to traumatic anterior shoulder dislocation(s) between 2014 and 2020. Failure to RTAD rates following ABR and Latarjet procedures were assessed presymptomatically, at six months and at final follow-up. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify factors associated with failure to RTAD. Covariates were selected based on univariate analyses. A heatmap was created to display the extent of limitations during work.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One-hundred-seven patients in military service with an average follow-up of 63 ± 26 months were included. RTAD rates at final follow-up were 76% and 85% for ABR and Latarjet patients (p=0.33). There were no factors associated with failure to RTAD at 6 months and final follow-up. The percentage of patients working above shoulder height that were very/extremely limited decreased from 20% to 4% (ABR) and 33% to 0% (Latarjet) preoperatively to final follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The return to active duty rates at final follow-up were 76% for ABR and 85% for Latarjet (p = 0.33). No variables associated with failure to RTAD were found at 6 months and at final follow-up at 63 ± 26 months. The degree of limitation experienced during work decreased for both patient groups following surgery (16-33% to 0-4%), suggesting an overall improvement in work performance for both groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":50051,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2024.12.039","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Given that shoulder instability mostly affects young patients, it is likely that return to active duty (RTAD) is an important factor in the military population. However, knowledge on factors associated with failure to RTAD in this patient group following arthroscopic Bankart repair (ABR) and Latarjet is limited.

Purpose: The aims were to (1) assess RTAD rates following ABR and Latarjet (2) determine prognostic factors that are associated with failure to RTAD and (3) assess the degree of limitation in work performance due to shoulder complaints.

Materials and methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted including consecutive patients who underwent ABR or open Latarjet procedure to treat shoulder instability due to traumatic anterior shoulder dislocation(s) between 2014 and 2020. Failure to RTAD rates following ABR and Latarjet procedures were assessed presymptomatically, at six months and at final follow-up. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify factors associated with failure to RTAD. Covariates were selected based on univariate analyses. A heatmap was created to display the extent of limitations during work.

Results: One-hundred-seven patients in military service with an average follow-up of 63 ± 26 months were included. RTAD rates at final follow-up were 76% and 85% for ABR and Latarjet patients (p=0.33). There were no factors associated with failure to RTAD at 6 months and final follow-up. The percentage of patients working above shoulder height that were very/extremely limited decreased from 20% to 4% (ABR) and 33% to 0% (Latarjet) preoperatively to final follow-up.

Conclusion: The return to active duty rates at final follow-up were 76% for ABR and 85% for Latarjet (p = 0.33). No variables associated with failure to RTAD were found at 6 months and at final follow-up at 63 ± 26 months. The degree of limitation experienced during work decreased for both patient groups following surgery (16-33% to 0-4%), suggesting an overall improvement in work performance for both groups.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
23.30%
发文量
604
审稿时长
11.2 weeks
期刊介绍: The official publication for eight leading specialty organizations, this authoritative journal is the only publication to focus exclusively on medical, surgical, and physical techniques for treating injury/disease of the upper extremity, including the shoulder girdle, arm, and elbow. Clinically oriented and peer-reviewed, the Journal provides an international forum for the exchange of information on new techniques, instruments, and materials. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery features vivid photos, professional illustrations, and explicit diagrams that demonstrate surgical approaches and depict implant devices. Topics covered include fractures, dislocations, diseases and injuries of the rotator cuff, imaging techniques, arthritis, arthroscopy, arthroplasty, and rehabilitation.
期刊最新文献
Females Experience Inferior Outcomes and Higher Rates of Revisions and Complications Compared to Males Following Anatomic Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Return to Active Duty following Bankart Repair and Latarjet Procedure for Traumatic Anterior Shoulder Dislocation in a Military Population: a Single Center Retrospective Cohort Study. Revision rates and patient-reported outcomes after shoulder hemiarthroplasty versus anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty in patients younger than 60 years: a cohort study with data from the Dutch Arthroplasty Register (LROI). Does Cutibacterium Skin Load Impact the Outcomes of Primary Shoulder Arthroplasty? Post-operative Pain Assessment in Shoulder Surgery: A Comparison amongst Healthcare Professionals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1