Current status and prospects of robotic surgery adoption in obstetrics and gynecology: insights from a nationwide survey.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Journal of Robotic Surgery Pub Date : 2025-02-12 DOI:10.1007/s11701-024-02197-x
Misa Hayasaka, Mihoko Dofutsu, Takuma Yoshimura, Ayako Taima, Hiroaki Komatsu, Hiroaki Kobayashi
{"title":"Current status and prospects of robotic surgery adoption in obstetrics and gynecology: insights from a nationwide survey.","authors":"Misa Hayasaka, Mihoko Dofutsu, Takuma Yoshimura, Ayako Taima, Hiroaki Komatsu, Hiroaki Kobayashi","doi":"10.1007/s11701-024-02197-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to elucidate the current status, disparities, and challenges in adopting gynecological robotic surgery in Japan. A cross-sectional online survey was conducted among 17,444 members of the Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology between September and November 2023. The questionnaire assessed the demographics, robotic surgery implementation, and attitudes toward robotic surgery. Of the 1443 respondents (8.3% response rate), 46.0% worked in facilities without robotic systems. A total of 69.8% supported further promotion of robotic surgery, with younger generations showing greater interest. Healthcare economics was identified as the primary barrier (94.1%). Perceptions of benefits varied between malignant (75.4%) and benign (53.1%) conditions. Only 33.2% of participants endorsed robotic surgery training during residency. Regional differences were observed in attitudes towards educational benefits. Additionally, responses differed based on the number of laparoscopic surgeries performed and prior robotic surgery experience. This study revealed the significant challenges in accessing robotic surgery and limitations in insurance coverage. Disparities in the awareness of the benefits and conflicts of laparoscopic surgery were identified. The upcoming merger of the robotic and endoscopic surgery societies may drive further adoption. Comprehensive educational programs and awareness campaigns are vital for improving access and understanding among obstetricians and gynecologists in Japan.</p>","PeriodicalId":47616,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Robotic Surgery","volume":"19 1","pages":"67"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Robotic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-024-02197-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to elucidate the current status, disparities, and challenges in adopting gynecological robotic surgery in Japan. A cross-sectional online survey was conducted among 17,444 members of the Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology between September and November 2023. The questionnaire assessed the demographics, robotic surgery implementation, and attitudes toward robotic surgery. Of the 1443 respondents (8.3% response rate), 46.0% worked in facilities without robotic systems. A total of 69.8% supported further promotion of robotic surgery, with younger generations showing greater interest. Healthcare economics was identified as the primary barrier (94.1%). Perceptions of benefits varied between malignant (75.4%) and benign (53.1%) conditions. Only 33.2% of participants endorsed robotic surgery training during residency. Regional differences were observed in attitudes towards educational benefits. Additionally, responses differed based on the number of laparoscopic surgeries performed and prior robotic surgery experience. This study revealed the significant challenges in accessing robotic surgery and limitations in insurance coverage. Disparities in the awareness of the benefits and conflicts of laparoscopic surgery were identified. The upcoming merger of the robotic and endoscopic surgery societies may drive further adoption. Comprehensive educational programs and awareness campaigns are vital for improving access and understanding among obstetricians and gynecologists in Japan.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
机器人手术在妇产科应用的现状和前景:来自全国调查的见解。
本研究旨在阐明日本采用妇科机器人手术的现状、差异和挑战。这项横断面在线调查是在2023年9月至11月期间对日本妇产科学会的17444名成员进行的。调查问卷评估了人口统计、机器人手术实施情况以及对机器人手术的态度。在1443名受访者(8.3%的回复率)中,46.0%的人在没有机器人系统的设施中工作。共有69.8%的人支持进一步推广机器人手术,年轻一代表现出更大的兴趣。卫生保健经济学被认为是主要障碍(94.1%)。对疗效的看法在恶性(75.4%)和良性(53.1%)情况下有所不同。只有33.2%的参与者支持住院医师期间的机器人手术培训。对教育利益的态度存在地区差异。此外,根据进行腹腔镜手术的次数和先前的机器人手术经验,反应也有所不同。这项研究揭示了获得机器人手术的重大挑战和保险覆盖范围的局限性。在腹腔镜手术的利益和冲突的认识差异被确定。即将到来的机器人和内窥镜手术协会的合并可能会推动进一步的采用。在日本,全面的教育计划和宣传活动对于提高产科医生和妇科医生的接触和理解至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
8.70%
发文量
145
期刊介绍: The aim of the Journal of Robotic Surgery is to become the leading worldwide journal for publication of articles related to robotic surgery, encompassing surgical simulation and integrated imaging techniques. The journal provides a centralized, focused resource for physicians wishing to publish their experience or those wishing to avail themselves of the most up-to-date findings.The journal reports on advance in a wide range of surgical specialties including adult and pediatric urology, general surgery, cardiac surgery, gynecology, ENT, orthopedics and neurosurgery.The use of robotics in surgery is broad-based and will undoubtedly expand over the next decade as new technical innovations and techniques increase the applicability of its use. The journal intends to capture this trend as it develops.
期刊最新文献
Colorectal cancer treatment assisted by robotic platforms - a systematic review. Predictors of persistent PSA after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a high-volume single-center experience. The importance of procedural indication in predicting operative time for elective robotic colon surgery. Learning curves of 13 surgeons for robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in a single institution: role of early case density. Comparison of clinical outcomes between TiRobot-assisted and conventional fluoroscopy-guided harms surgery for upper cervical fractures with atlantoaxial instability.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1