Robot-assisted inguinal hernia repair and prostatectomy: safety and outcomes from a retrospective cohort study.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Journal of Robotic Surgery Pub Date : 2025-02-13 DOI:10.1007/s11701-025-02233-4
Omaira Rodríguez González, Alexis Sanchez, Veronica Rodriguez, Luz Galvis, Antonio Ardiles, Cristina Inchausti, Natalia Otaño, Rene Sotelo
{"title":"Robot-assisted inguinal hernia repair and prostatectomy: safety and outcomes from a retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Omaira Rodríguez González, Alexis Sanchez, Veronica Rodriguez, Luz Galvis, Antonio Ardiles, Cristina Inchausti, Natalia Otaño, Rene Sotelo","doi":"10.1007/s11701-025-02233-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Prostate cancer and inguinal hernia frequently coexist in elderly men, with 20-33% of patients undergoing radical prostatectomy also presenting with an inguinal hernia. Combining robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) with transabdominal preperitoneal (rTAPP) hernia repair offers both clinical and logistical benefits, although concerns regarding mesh-related complications remain. This retrospective cohort study analyzed 40 patients who underwent combined RARP and rTAPP hernia repair between August 2021 and September 2024. The mean operative time was 192.83 ± 32.57 min, with 54.2 ± 16.75 min dedicated to hernia repair. No mesh-related complications, including seromas or hematomas in the inguinal region, were observed. Minor complications (Clavien-Dindo ≤ 2) occurred in 25.64% of patients, with seromas (12.82%) and surgical site infections (7.69%) being the most common. The average hospital stay was 1.9 ± 0.50 days, and no hernia recurrences were noted during a mean follow-up of 16.03 ± 10.32 months. These findings support the safety and feasibility of simultaneous RARP and rTAPP hernia repair, maintaining low complication rates and eliminating the need for additional surgeries. Further multicenter studies are needed to validate these results and assess long-term outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":47616,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Robotic Surgery","volume":"19 1","pages":"69"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Robotic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-025-02233-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Prostate cancer and inguinal hernia frequently coexist in elderly men, with 20-33% of patients undergoing radical prostatectomy also presenting with an inguinal hernia. Combining robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) with transabdominal preperitoneal (rTAPP) hernia repair offers both clinical and logistical benefits, although concerns regarding mesh-related complications remain. This retrospective cohort study analyzed 40 patients who underwent combined RARP and rTAPP hernia repair between August 2021 and September 2024. The mean operative time was 192.83 ± 32.57 min, with 54.2 ± 16.75 min dedicated to hernia repair. No mesh-related complications, including seromas or hematomas in the inguinal region, were observed. Minor complications (Clavien-Dindo ≤ 2) occurred in 25.64% of patients, with seromas (12.82%) and surgical site infections (7.69%) being the most common. The average hospital stay was 1.9 ± 0.50 days, and no hernia recurrences were noted during a mean follow-up of 16.03 ± 10.32 months. These findings support the safety and feasibility of simultaneous RARP and rTAPP hernia repair, maintaining low complication rates and eliminating the need for additional surgeries. Further multicenter studies are needed to validate these results and assess long-term outcomes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
机器人辅助腹股沟疝修补和前列腺切除术:一项回顾性队列研究的安全性和结果。
前列腺癌和腹股沟疝在老年男性中经常共存,20-33%的根治性前列腺切除术患者同时出现腹股沟疝。结合机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术(RARP)和经腹腹膜前疝修补术(rTAPP)提供了临床和后勤方面的好处,尽管对网状相关并发症的担忧仍然存在。这项回顾性队列研究分析了2021年8月至2024年9月期间接受RARP和rTAPP联合疝修补术的40例患者。平均手术时间192.83±32.57 min,其中疝修补54.2±16.75 min。未观察到网状物相关的并发症,包括腹股沟区域的血肿或血肿。轻微并发症(Clavien-Dindo≤2)发生率为25.64%,其中以血清肿(12.82%)和手术部位感染(7.69%)最为常见。平均住院时间1.9±0.50天,平均随访16.03±10.32个月,无疝复发。这些发现支持RARP和rTAPP同时修补疝的安全性和可行性,保持低并发症发生率,消除了额外手术的需要。需要进一步的多中心研究来验证这些结果并评估长期结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
8.70%
发文量
145
期刊介绍: The aim of the Journal of Robotic Surgery is to become the leading worldwide journal for publication of articles related to robotic surgery, encompassing surgical simulation and integrated imaging techniques. The journal provides a centralized, focused resource for physicians wishing to publish their experience or those wishing to avail themselves of the most up-to-date findings.The journal reports on advance in a wide range of surgical specialties including adult and pediatric urology, general surgery, cardiac surgery, gynecology, ENT, orthopedics and neurosurgery.The use of robotics in surgery is broad-based and will undoubtedly expand over the next decade as new technical innovations and techniques increase the applicability of its use. The journal intends to capture this trend as it develops.
期刊最新文献
Colorectal cancer treatment assisted by robotic platforms - a systematic review. Predictors of persistent PSA after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a high-volume single-center experience. The importance of procedural indication in predicting operative time for elective robotic colon surgery. Learning curves of 13 surgeons for robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in a single institution: role of early case density. Comparison of clinical outcomes between TiRobot-assisted and conventional fluoroscopy-guided harms surgery for upper cervical fractures with atlantoaxial instability.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1