Impact of low-pressure pneumoperitoneum on post-operative pain in robotic urological surgery: a systematic review.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Journal of Robotic Surgery Pub Date : 2025-02-17 DOI:10.1007/s11701-025-02221-8
Yama Baheer, Lawrence Isherwood, Ross Warner, Jeremy Teoh, Karel Decaestecker, Prokar Dasgupta, Will Tillinghast, George Trutza, Nikhil Vasdev
{"title":"Impact of low-pressure pneumoperitoneum on post-operative pain in robotic urological surgery: a systematic review.","authors":"Yama Baheer, Lawrence Isherwood, Ross Warner, Jeremy Teoh, Karel Decaestecker, Prokar Dasgupta, Will Tillinghast, George Trutza, Nikhil Vasdev","doi":"10.1007/s11701-025-02221-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Robotic technology has revolutionised minimally invasive urological surgery, enhancing precision and minimising surgical complications. Recent evidence suggests that utilising lower pneumoperitoneum pressures improves clinical outcomes but the comparative impact on post-operative pain remains uncertain. This systematic review analyses the literature on low-pressure pneumoperitoneum to investigate its impact on pain and recovery following robotic-assisted urological surgeries, including prostatectomy, partial ephrectomy, and cystectomy. Post-operative opioid consumption, total operating time, estimated intra-operative bleeding, and total inpatient stay were investigated as secondary outcomes. PubMed, NHS Knowledge and Library Hub, Cochrane Central databases, and EMBASE were searched between January 2010 and May 2024. Any identified studies were reviewed against eligibility criteria by two independent authors prior to inclusion. The review was written in compliance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews (PRISMA) guidelines. Nine studies were included: six focused on prostatectomy, two on partial nephrectomy, and one on cystectomy. Low-pressure pneumoperitoneum was found to result in reduced postoperative pain scores, particularly in the immediate recovery period and on postoperative day 1. Despite these improvements, post-operative opioid consumption remained consistent with standard pressures. The surgical workspace was not compromised when pneumoperitoneum pressures were lower. Lowering pneumoperitoneum pressures in robotic-assisted urological surgery appears to reduce immediate postoperative pain scores without increasing overall complications. This has not led to a noticeable reduction in post-operative opioid consumption. The lack of consistent reduction in opioid use and limited high-quality studies highlight the need for further research, particularly for partial nephrectomy and cystectomy.</p>","PeriodicalId":47616,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Robotic Surgery","volume":"19 1","pages":"72"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Robotic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-025-02221-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Robotic technology has revolutionised minimally invasive urological surgery, enhancing precision and minimising surgical complications. Recent evidence suggests that utilising lower pneumoperitoneum pressures improves clinical outcomes but the comparative impact on post-operative pain remains uncertain. This systematic review analyses the literature on low-pressure pneumoperitoneum to investigate its impact on pain and recovery following robotic-assisted urological surgeries, including prostatectomy, partial ephrectomy, and cystectomy. Post-operative opioid consumption, total operating time, estimated intra-operative bleeding, and total inpatient stay were investigated as secondary outcomes. PubMed, NHS Knowledge and Library Hub, Cochrane Central databases, and EMBASE were searched between January 2010 and May 2024. Any identified studies were reviewed against eligibility criteria by two independent authors prior to inclusion. The review was written in compliance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews (PRISMA) guidelines. Nine studies were included: six focused on prostatectomy, two on partial nephrectomy, and one on cystectomy. Low-pressure pneumoperitoneum was found to result in reduced postoperative pain scores, particularly in the immediate recovery period and on postoperative day 1. Despite these improvements, post-operative opioid consumption remained consistent with standard pressures. The surgical workspace was not compromised when pneumoperitoneum pressures were lower. Lowering pneumoperitoneum pressures in robotic-assisted urological surgery appears to reduce immediate postoperative pain scores without increasing overall complications. This has not led to a noticeable reduction in post-operative opioid consumption. The lack of consistent reduction in opioid use and limited high-quality studies highlight the need for further research, particularly for partial nephrectomy and cystectomy.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
泌尿外科机器人手术中低压气腹对术后疼痛的影响:系统综述。
机器人技术彻底改变了微创泌尿外科手术,提高了手术精度,最大限度地减少了手术并发症。最近的证据表明,使用较低的气腹压力可以改善临床结果,但对术后疼痛的比较影响仍不确定。本系统综述分析了有关低压气腹的文献,以探讨其对机器人辅助泌尿外科手术后疼痛和恢复的影响,包括前列腺切除术、部分肾切除术和膀胱切除术。术后阿片类药物用量、总手术时间、估计术中出血和总住院时间作为次要结果进行调查。检索了2010年1月至2024年5月间的PubMed、NHS Knowledge and Library Hub、Cochrane Central数据库和EMBASE。所有确定的研究在纳入前均由两名独立作者根据入选标准进行审查。本综述是按照系统评价的首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南编写的。纳入9项研究:6项集中于前列腺切除术,2项集中于部分肾切除术,1项集中于膀胱切除术。发现低压气腹导致术后疼痛评分降低,特别是在立即恢复期和术后第1天。尽管有这些改善,术后阿片类药物的消耗仍然与标准压力保持一致。当气腹压力较低时,手术工作空间不受损害。在机器人辅助泌尿外科手术中,降低气腹压力似乎可以减少术后立即疼痛评分,而不会增加总体并发症。这并没有导致术后阿片类药物消耗的显著减少。缺乏持续减少阿片类药物使用和有限的高质量研究突出了进一步研究的必要性,特别是对部分肾切除术和膀胱切除术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
8.70%
发文量
145
期刊介绍: The aim of the Journal of Robotic Surgery is to become the leading worldwide journal for publication of articles related to robotic surgery, encompassing surgical simulation and integrated imaging techniques. The journal provides a centralized, focused resource for physicians wishing to publish their experience or those wishing to avail themselves of the most up-to-date findings.The journal reports on advance in a wide range of surgical specialties including adult and pediatric urology, general surgery, cardiac surgery, gynecology, ENT, orthopedics and neurosurgery.The use of robotics in surgery is broad-based and will undoubtedly expand over the next decade as new technical innovations and techniques increase the applicability of its use. The journal intends to capture this trend as it develops.
期刊最新文献
Global trends and thematic evolution in robotic urogynecologic surgery: a mapping and visualization study (Inception - 2025). Resuscitation during robotic-assisted pelvic surgery: impact of simulation training and system-specific factors. Comparative clinical performance of robotic-assisted systems in spinal deformity surgery: focus on perioperative outcomes and pedicle screw accuracy. Robotic Liver Resection for Gallbladder Cancer: Does Common Bile Duct Resection Matter? An International Propensity-Matched Study. Correction: Single-versus multi-port robotic partial nephrectomy: a meta-analytic study of perioperative, functional, and oncologic outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1