Modality-level obstacles and initiatives to improve representation in fetal, infant, and toddler neuroimaging research samples

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 NEUROSCIENCES Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-03 DOI:10.1016/j.dcn.2024.101505
Emma T. Margolis , Paige M. Nelson , Abigail Fiske , Juliette L.Y. Champaud , Halie A. Olson , María José C. Gomez , Áine T. Dineen , Chiara Bulgarelli , Sonya V. Troller-Renfree , Kirsten A. Donald , Marisa N. Spann , Brittany Howell , Dustin Scheinost , Marta Korom
{"title":"Modality-level obstacles and initiatives to improve representation in fetal, infant, and toddler neuroimaging research samples","authors":"Emma T. Margolis ,&nbsp;Paige M. Nelson ,&nbsp;Abigail Fiske ,&nbsp;Juliette L.Y. Champaud ,&nbsp;Halie A. Olson ,&nbsp;María José C. Gomez ,&nbsp;Áine T. Dineen ,&nbsp;Chiara Bulgarelli ,&nbsp;Sonya V. Troller-Renfree ,&nbsp;Kirsten A. Donald ,&nbsp;Marisa N. Spann ,&nbsp;Brittany Howell ,&nbsp;Dustin Scheinost ,&nbsp;Marta Korom","doi":"10.1016/j.dcn.2024.101505","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Fetal, infant, and toddler (FIT) neuroimaging researchers study early brain development to gain insights into neurodevelopmental processes and identify early markers of neurobiological vulnerabilities to target for intervention. However, the field has historically excluded people from global majority countries and from marginalized communities in FIT neuroimaging research. Inclusive and representative samples are essential for generalizing findings across neuroimaging modalities, such as magnetic resonance imaging, magnetoencephalography, electroencephalography, functional near-infrared spectroscopy, and cranial ultrasonography. These FIT neuroimaging techniques pose unique and overlapping challenges to equitable representation in research through sampling bias, technical constraints, limited accessibility, and insufficient resources. The present article adds to the conversation around the need to improve inclusivity by highlighting modality-specific historical and current obstacles and ongoing initiatives. We conclude by discussing tangible solutions that transcend individual modalities, ultimately providing recommendations to promote equitable FIT neuroscience.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49083,"journal":{"name":"Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience","volume":"72 ","pages":"Article 101505"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S187892932400166X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Fetal, infant, and toddler (FIT) neuroimaging researchers study early brain development to gain insights into neurodevelopmental processes and identify early markers of neurobiological vulnerabilities to target for intervention. However, the field has historically excluded people from global majority countries and from marginalized communities in FIT neuroimaging research. Inclusive and representative samples are essential for generalizing findings across neuroimaging modalities, such as magnetic resonance imaging, magnetoencephalography, electroencephalography, functional near-infrared spectroscopy, and cranial ultrasonography. These FIT neuroimaging techniques pose unique and overlapping challenges to equitable representation in research through sampling bias, technical constraints, limited accessibility, and insufficient resources. The present article adds to the conversation around the need to improve inclusivity by highlighting modality-specific historical and current obstacles and ongoing initiatives. We conclude by discussing tangible solutions that transcend individual modalities, ultimately providing recommendations to promote equitable FIT neuroscience.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
模式水平的障碍和倡议,以提高胎儿,婴儿和幼儿神经影像学研究样本的代表性
胎儿、婴儿和幼儿(FIT)神经影像学研究人员研究早期大脑发育,以深入了解神经发育过程,并确定神经生物学脆弱性的早期标记,以进行干预。然而,在FIT神经影像学研究中,该领域历来将来自全球多数国家和边缘化社区的人排除在外。具有包容性和代表性的样本对于跨神经成像模式(如磁共振成像、脑磁图、脑电图、功能性近红外光谱和颅超声)的发现是必不可少的。这些FIT神经成像技术通过抽样偏差、技术限制、有限的可及性和资源不足,对研究中的公平代表性提出了独特和重叠的挑战。本文通过强调特定模式的历史和当前障碍以及正在进行的举措,增加了围绕提高包容性必要性的对话。最后,我们讨论了超越个体模式的切实解决方案,最终提出了促进公平FIT神经科学的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
10.60%
发文量
124
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal publishes theoretical and research papers on cognitive brain development, from infancy through childhood and adolescence and into adulthood. It covers neurocognitive development and neurocognitive processing in both typical and atypical development, including social and affective aspects. Appropriate methodologies for the journal include, but are not limited to, functional neuroimaging (fMRI and MEG), electrophysiology (EEG and ERP), NIRS and transcranial magnetic stimulation, as well as other basic neuroscience approaches using cellular and animal models that directly address cognitive brain development, patient studies, case studies, post-mortem studies and pharmacological studies.
期刊最新文献
Unpredictable caregiving is associated with disrupted neurophysiological measures of attention and autonomic function in three-month-old infants Developmental and aging trajectories of 40-Hz auditory steady-state responses: A systematic review across the human lifespan Neural specialization of print processing in second language learning: A longitudinal ERP study of Chinese children learning English A shift in brain functional systems during mother-child neural synchrony marks children’s cognitive development MRI-based structural development of the human newborn hypothalamus
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1