Findings in pedestrian route choice experiments: Tradeoff and hypothetical bias

IF 5.7 2区 工程技术 Q1 TRANSPORTATION Travel Behaviour and Society Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-13 DOI:10.1016/j.tbs.2025.101000
Cheng-Jie Jin , Jiaxin Li , Chenyang Wu , Xiaoxuan Xiu , Dawei Li
{"title":"Findings in pedestrian route choice experiments: Tradeoff and hypothetical bias","authors":"Cheng-Jie Jin ,&nbsp;Jiaxin Li ,&nbsp;Chenyang Wu ,&nbsp;Xiaoxuan Xiu ,&nbsp;Dawei Li","doi":"10.1016/j.tbs.2025.101000","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In this paper, we study the pedestrian route choice behaviors through a controlled experiment. Two routes with different lengths and waiting times are considered. Sometimes, extra rewards are given to test the different responses in diverse situations. The surveys before and after the experiments (S1 and S2) can aid in collecting data on pedestrians’ individual traits. In the binary logit model, the main factors for pedestrian route choice are identified and discussed, including the route, experimental and pedestrian attributes from the surveys and experiments. Next, we employ three methods to explore the hypothetical bias of pedestrian route choice behaviors: (1) Comparisons of logit model coefficients; (2) Predictions of revealed results by stated results; (3) Proposal of a new indicator (named PB) and related linear regressions. The results indicate that the hypothetical bias can be quantitatively measured and reduced, which could be beneficial for future studies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51534,"journal":{"name":"Travel Behaviour and Society","volume":"40 ","pages":"Article 101000"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Travel Behaviour and Society","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214367X25000183","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this paper, we study the pedestrian route choice behaviors through a controlled experiment. Two routes with different lengths and waiting times are considered. Sometimes, extra rewards are given to test the different responses in diverse situations. The surveys before and after the experiments (S1 and S2) can aid in collecting data on pedestrians’ individual traits. In the binary logit model, the main factors for pedestrian route choice are identified and discussed, including the route, experimental and pedestrian attributes from the surveys and experiments. Next, we employ three methods to explore the hypothetical bias of pedestrian route choice behaviors: (1) Comparisons of logit model coefficients; (2) Predictions of revealed results by stated results; (3) Proposal of a new indicator (named PB) and related linear regressions. The results indicate that the hypothetical bias can be quantitatively measured and reduced, which could be beneficial for future studies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
行人路线选择实验的发现:权衡与假设偏差
本文通过对照实验研究了行人的路径选择行为。考虑两条不同长度和等待时间的路线。有时,额外的奖励是为了测试在不同情况下的不同反应。实验前和实验后(S1和S2)的调查有助于收集行人的个体特征数据。在二元logit模型中,识别并讨论了行人路径选择的主要因素,包括调查和实验所得的路径属性、实验属性和行人属性。接下来,我们采用三种方法来探讨行人路径选择行为的假设偏差:(1)logit模型系数的比较;(二)用陈述结果预测揭示结果;(3)提出一个新的指标(PB)和相关的线性回归。结果表明,假设偏差可以定量测量和减少,这可能有利于未来的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
7.70%
发文量
109
期刊介绍: Travel Behaviour and Society is an interdisciplinary journal publishing high-quality original papers which report leading edge research in theories, methodologies and applications concerning transportation issues and challenges which involve the social and spatial dimensions. In particular, it provides a discussion forum for major research in travel behaviour, transportation infrastructure, transportation and environmental issues, mobility and social sustainability, transportation geographic information systems (TGIS), transportation and quality of life, transportation data collection and analysis, etc.
期刊最新文献
(Un)Easy Riders: The real-world potential of integrating carpooling into digital travel planners Assessing automated vehicle-induced VMT: meta-analysis of current research Formation mechanisms of perceived accessibility in the digital era: A multidimensional S-O-R analysis with digital literacy modulation Integrating activity-based travel behavior into user equilibrium-constrained expansion planning of EV charging network: a bi-level programming approach Inferring daily mobility patterns from Google Maps Timeline: Opportunities and challenges
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1