Stronger Response of Plant N:P to Nitrogen Enrichment When Considering Roots

IF 12 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION Global Change Biology Pub Date : 2025-02-14 DOI:10.1111/gcb.70091
Yu Ning, Feike A. Dijkstra, Xiao-Sa Liang, Xiao-Jing Zhang, Guo-Jiao Yang, Liang-Chao Jiang, Xing-Guo Han, Xiao-Tao Lü
{"title":"Stronger Response of Plant N:P to Nitrogen Enrichment When Considering Roots","authors":"Yu Ning,&nbsp;Feike A. Dijkstra,&nbsp;Xiao-Sa Liang,&nbsp;Xiao-Jing Zhang,&nbsp;Guo-Jiao Yang,&nbsp;Liang-Chao Jiang,&nbsp;Xing-Guo Han,&nbsp;Xiao-Tao Lü","doi":"10.1111/gcb.70091","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Nitrogen (N) enrichment leads to an imbalance of N and phosphorus (P) in plants by enhancing plant N:P, with consequences for ecosystem processes and function. However, the evidence for a plant N–P imbalance is predominantly from studies on aboveground tissues. It remains unclear whether imbalanced aboveground responses would be paralleled by similar responses in roots, which contribute to nearly 70% of total biomass in grasslands globally. We measured community-level N:P stoichiometry of both shoots and roots to 1 m depth across a wide-ranging N addition gradient in a temperate steppe after 7–9 years of treatment. Both shoot N:P (SNP) and root N:P (RNP) showed nonlinear responses to increasing N addition rates, where N:P first increased and then saturated. RNP was significantly higher than SNP and saturated at higher N addition rates than SNP (39.0 vs. 16.8 g N m<sup>−2</sup> yr.<sup>−1</sup>). Furthermore, the inter-annual stability of RNP was higher than that of SNP. Consequently, N:P in whole plants was higher than that in shoots, indicating more severe N–P imbalance than based on shoot measurements only. Previous results from aboveground parts might have underestimated the enhancement of N enrichment on plant N:P. Our results imply that belowground food webs with roots as their food resource would be more severely suffering from N–P imbalance than aboveground food webs.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":175,"journal":{"name":"Global Change Biology","volume":"31 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":12.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Change Biology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gcb.70091","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Nitrogen (N) enrichment leads to an imbalance of N and phosphorus (P) in plants by enhancing plant N:P, with consequences for ecosystem processes and function. However, the evidence for a plant N–P imbalance is predominantly from studies on aboveground tissues. It remains unclear whether imbalanced aboveground responses would be paralleled by similar responses in roots, which contribute to nearly 70% of total biomass in grasslands globally. We measured community-level N:P stoichiometry of both shoots and roots to 1 m depth across a wide-ranging N addition gradient in a temperate steppe after 7–9 years of treatment. Both shoot N:P (SNP) and root N:P (RNP) showed nonlinear responses to increasing N addition rates, where N:P first increased and then saturated. RNP was significantly higher than SNP and saturated at higher N addition rates than SNP (39.0 vs. 16.8 g N m−2 yr.−1). Furthermore, the inter-annual stability of RNP was higher than that of SNP. Consequently, N:P in whole plants was higher than that in shoots, indicating more severe N–P imbalance than based on shoot measurements only. Previous results from aboveground parts might have underestimated the enhancement of N enrichment on plant N:P. Our results imply that belowground food webs with roots as their food resource would be more severely suffering from N–P imbalance than aboveground food webs.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
考虑根系时,植物N:P对富氮的响应更强
氮(N)富集通过提高植物N:P,导致植物体内N和磷(P)失衡,对生态系统过程和功能产生影响。然而,植物氮磷失衡的证据主要来自对地上组织的研究。目前尚不清楚地表上不平衡的响应是否会与根系的类似响应相平行,根系贡献了全球草地总生物量的近70%。在7-9年的处理后,我们测量了温带草原不同施氮梯度下1 m深度的群落水平上的芽和根的N:P化学计量。地上部N:P (SNP)和根系N:P (RNP)随施氮量的增加均表现出先升高后饱和的非线性响应。RNP显著高于SNP,并且在更高的N添加速率下饱和(39.0比16.8 g N m - 2年。- 1)。此外,RNP的年际稳定性高于SNP。因此,全株N:P高于茎部N:P,表明氮磷失衡比单靠茎部测量更为严重。以往对地上部分的研究结果可能低估了氮对植物N:P富集的增强作用。研究结果表明,以根系为食物来源的地下食物网比地上食物网遭受的氮磷失衡更为严重。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Global Change Biology
Global Change Biology 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
21.50
自引率
5.20%
发文量
497
审稿时长
3.3 months
期刊介绍: Global Change Biology is an environmental change journal committed to shaping the future and addressing the world's most pressing challenges, including sustainability, climate change, environmental protection, food and water safety, and global health. Dedicated to fostering a profound understanding of the impacts of global change on biological systems and offering innovative solutions, the journal publishes a diverse range of content, including primary research articles, technical advances, research reviews, reports, opinions, perspectives, commentaries, and letters. Starting with the 2024 volume, Global Change Biology will transition to an online-only format, enhancing accessibility and contributing to the evolution of scholarly communication.
期刊最新文献
The Separate Roles of Vascular Plants and Sphagnum Mosses in Regulating the Net CO 2 Exchange in a Boreal Peatland During Key Phenological Phases Sunflower Sea Stars Can Counteract Warming‐Driven Increases in Sea Urchin Populations Why Biodiversity Loss Matters More in a Stressful World. HomoTherm: An Open-Source Approach to Modelling Heat Exchange in Humans and Other Hominins in Diverse Environments. Global Phosphorus Enrichment Reshapes Terrestrial Phosphorus Cycling.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1