Effects of Increased Housing Space Without Altering Stocking Density on Body Weight, Stress, and Gut Microbiome in Broiler Chickens.

IF 2.7 2区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE Animals Pub Date : 2025-02-05 DOI:10.3390/ani15030441
Eun Bae Kim, Seojin Choi, Jongbin Park, Biao Xuan
{"title":"Effects of Increased Housing Space Without Altering Stocking Density on Body Weight, Stress, and Gut Microbiome in Broiler Chickens.","authors":"Eun Bae Kim, Seojin Choi, Jongbin Park, Biao Xuan","doi":"10.3390/ani15030441","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Effective poultry management practices that promote chicken health are crucial for producing higher-quality chicken meat at a lower cost. This study examined the hypothesis that increasing space while maintaining stocking density may positively impact poultry health. We evaluated body weight (BW) as an indicator of growth, stress markers, and the composition of the gut microbiome by comparing two housing sizes: smaller (control) and larger (treatment) spaces, with 10 birds per space and a stocking density of 12.3 birds/m<sup>2</sup>. Chickens in the larger space had 15% higher BW (<i>p</i> = 0.06) compared to those in the smaller space when significance was evaluated at <i>p</i> < 0.10. Stress indicators such as blood cortisol (acute) and brain <i>FKBP51</i> did not differ significantly. Faith's phylogenetic diversity was marginally higher in the larger space (<i>p</i> = 0.05), and microbial communities differed significantly between the two groups. The relative abundance of several genera, including <i>Clostridium_sensu_stricto_1</i> (<i>p</i> = 0.02), <i>Lactobacillus</i> (<i>p</i> = 0.03), and <i>Paracoccus</i> (<i>p</i> < 0.01), was greater in the larger space, whereas <i>Turicibacter</i> (<i>p</i> = 0.02), <i>Escherichia-Shigella</i> (<i>p</i> = 0.01), and <i>Lysinibacillus</i> (<i>p</i> = 0.01) were more abundant in the smaller space. The larger and smaller spaces were associated with a significant (<i>p</i> < 0.05) increase in the abundance of 39 and 25 MetaCyc pathways, respectively, involved in amino acid and nitrogen metabolisms. These findings suggest that increasing housing space without altering stocking density or additional treatments may improve both growth and gut microbiome health in broilers. Our results provide insights into the relationship between chicken housing environments and the gut microbiome.</p>","PeriodicalId":7955,"journal":{"name":"Animals","volume":"15 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11816066/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Animals","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15030441","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Effective poultry management practices that promote chicken health are crucial for producing higher-quality chicken meat at a lower cost. This study examined the hypothesis that increasing space while maintaining stocking density may positively impact poultry health. We evaluated body weight (BW) as an indicator of growth, stress markers, and the composition of the gut microbiome by comparing two housing sizes: smaller (control) and larger (treatment) spaces, with 10 birds per space and a stocking density of 12.3 birds/m2. Chickens in the larger space had 15% higher BW (p = 0.06) compared to those in the smaller space when significance was evaluated at p < 0.10. Stress indicators such as blood cortisol (acute) and brain FKBP51 did not differ significantly. Faith's phylogenetic diversity was marginally higher in the larger space (p = 0.05), and microbial communities differed significantly between the two groups. The relative abundance of several genera, including Clostridium_sensu_stricto_1 (p = 0.02), Lactobacillus (p = 0.03), and Paracoccus (p < 0.01), was greater in the larger space, whereas Turicibacter (p = 0.02), Escherichia-Shigella (p = 0.01), and Lysinibacillus (p = 0.01) were more abundant in the smaller space. The larger and smaller spaces were associated with a significant (p < 0.05) increase in the abundance of 39 and 25 MetaCyc pathways, respectively, involved in amino acid and nitrogen metabolisms. These findings suggest that increasing housing space without altering stocking density or additional treatments may improve both growth and gut microbiome health in broilers. Our results provide insights into the relationship between chicken housing environments and the gut microbiome.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在不改变饲养密度的情况下增加饲养空间对肉鸡体重、应激和肠道微生物组的影响
促进鸡健康的有效家禽管理做法对于以较低成本生产高质量的鸡肉至关重要。本研究检验了在保持饲养密度的同时增加饲养空间可能对家禽健康产生积极影响的假设。我们通过比较较小(对照)和较大(处理)两种饲养空间(每个空间10只,放养密度为12.3只/m2),来评估体重(BW)作为生长、应激标志物和肠道微生物组组成的指标。当p < 0.10时,较大空间比较小空间的鸡的体重提高15% (p = 0.06)。应激指标如血皮质醇(急性)和脑FKBP51无显著差异。信仰的系统发育多样性在更大的空间中略高(p = 0.05),微生物群落在两组之间差异显著。Clostridium_sensu_stricto_1 (p = 0.02)、Lactobacillus (p = 0.03)、Paracoccus (p < 0.01)等属在较大空间的相对丰度较高,而Turicibacter (p = 0.02)、eschericia - shigella (p = 0.01)、Lysinibacillus (p = 0.01)等属在较小空间的相对丰度较高。与氨基酸代谢和氮代谢相关的39条和25条MetaCyc通路的丰度分别随着空间的增大和变小而显著增加(p < 0.05)。这些发现表明,在不改变饲养密度或额外处理的情况下增加饲养空间可能会改善肉鸡的生长和肠道微生物群健康。我们的研究结果为鸡的饲养环境和肠道微生物群之间的关系提供了见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Animals
Animals Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Animal Science and Zoology
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
16.70%
发文量
3015
审稿时长
20.52 days
期刊介绍: Animals (ISSN 2076-2615) is an international and interdisciplinary scholarly open access journal. It publishes original research articles, reviews, communications, and short notes that are relevant to any field of study that involves animals, including zoology, ethnozoology, animal science, animal ethics and animal welfare. However, preference will be given to those articles that provide an understanding of animals within a larger context (i.e., the animals'' interactions with the outside world, including humans). There is no restriction on the length of the papers. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical research in as much detail as possible. Full experimental details and/or method of study, must be provided for research articles. Articles submitted that involve subjecting animals to unnecessary pain or suffering will not be accepted, and all articles must be submitted with the necessary ethical approval (please refer to the Ethical Guidelines for more information).
期刊最新文献
Importance of Social Hierarchy in Morphometry, and Socio-Sexual and Reproductive Behaviors in Dorper Sheep in Northern Mexico. Preliminary Investigation of a Transcutaneous Ultrasound-Guided Technique for Pudendal Nerve Block in Six Horse Cadavers. Perioperative Validation of Two Handheld Glucometers in Dogs Under General Anesthesia: Analytical Robustness and Clinical Risk Assessment. A Retrospective Investigation of 28 Cats with Intermediate- to Large-Cell Lymphoma Treated with Lomustine and Prednisolone as a First-Line Chemotherapy. Comparative Growth Performance and Intestinal Morphological Development Between Liangshan Yanying Chicken and Arbor Acres Chicken During the Brooding Stage.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1