Leslie P Scheunemann, Janelle C Christensen, Erica M Motter, S Peter Kim, Peter Eisenhauer, Nimit Gandhi, Heather Tomko, Kelly M Potter, Timothy D Girard, Charles F Reynolds, Natalie E Leland
{"title":"Ableism After Critical Illness: A Qualitative Translation of Key Concepts to the Post-ICU Context.","authors":"Leslie P Scheunemann, Janelle C Christensen, Erica M Motter, S Peter Kim, Peter Eisenhauer, Nimit Gandhi, Heather Tomko, Kelly M Potter, Timothy D Girard, Charles F Reynolds, Natalie E Leland","doi":"10.1097/CCM.0000000000006596","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Ableism-discrimination and social prejudice against people with disabilities-defines people by their disability and assumes that disabled people require fixing. We sought to characterize ableism after critical illness and to describe its relationship with care delivery.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A secondary analysis of semi-structured individual interviews (n = 42) and ten group interviews (n = 68 participants) using modified grounded theory. We identified categories of ableism informed by existing disability studies literature and used patterns in the analysis to describe overarching themes.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>A large healthcare system in western Pennsylvania.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Critical illness survivors, family members, clinicians, and administrators.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>None.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>Two overarching themes emerged: ableism presents multifaceted barriers to participation in meaningful activities after critical illness, and it is endemic. We observed examples of ableism in all interviews. The quotes characterizing ableism fell into six categories: 1) infantilization and patronization; 2) disability leading to inability; 3) denial of disability experience; 4) invasion of privacy and denial of meaningful relationships; 5) being ignored and excluded; and 6) pushing care providers beyond their perceived capacity. When participants expressed ableism toward others, it was typically matter-of-fact; however, when participants described experiencing or witnessing ableism, they expressed feelings ranging from anxiety to outrage. Participants explicitly and implicitly connected expressions of ableism to broader policies and practices, providing evidence that ableism is endemic to this healthcare system.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Ableism presents multifaceted barriers to participation after critical illness, undermining resilience and wellbeing. We hypothesize that anti-ableist interventions could reduce disability-related barriers to resilience to optimize recovery after critical illness.</p>","PeriodicalId":10765,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000006596","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: Ableism-discrimination and social prejudice against people with disabilities-defines people by their disability and assumes that disabled people require fixing. We sought to characterize ableism after critical illness and to describe its relationship with care delivery.
Design: A secondary analysis of semi-structured individual interviews (n = 42) and ten group interviews (n = 68 participants) using modified grounded theory. We identified categories of ableism informed by existing disability studies literature and used patterns in the analysis to describe overarching themes.
Setting: A large healthcare system in western Pennsylvania.
Participants: Critical illness survivors, family members, clinicians, and administrators.
Interventions: None.
Measurements and main results: Two overarching themes emerged: ableism presents multifaceted barriers to participation in meaningful activities after critical illness, and it is endemic. We observed examples of ableism in all interviews. The quotes characterizing ableism fell into six categories: 1) infantilization and patronization; 2) disability leading to inability; 3) denial of disability experience; 4) invasion of privacy and denial of meaningful relationships; 5) being ignored and excluded; and 6) pushing care providers beyond their perceived capacity. When participants expressed ableism toward others, it was typically matter-of-fact; however, when participants described experiencing or witnessing ableism, they expressed feelings ranging from anxiety to outrage. Participants explicitly and implicitly connected expressions of ableism to broader policies and practices, providing evidence that ableism is endemic to this healthcare system.
Conclusions: Ableism presents multifaceted barriers to participation after critical illness, undermining resilience and wellbeing. We hypothesize that anti-ableist interventions could reduce disability-related barriers to resilience to optimize recovery after critical illness.
期刊介绍:
Critical Care Medicine is the premier peer-reviewed, scientific publication in critical care medicine. Directed to those specialists who treat patients in the ICU and CCU, including chest physicians, surgeons, pediatricians, pharmacists/pharmacologists, anesthesiologists, critical care nurses, and other healthcare professionals, Critical Care Medicine covers all aspects of acute and emergency care for the critically ill or injured patient.
Each issue presents critical care practitioners with clinical breakthroughs that lead to better patient care, the latest news on promising research, and advances in equipment and techniques.