Ableism After Critical Illness: A Qualitative Translation of Key Concepts to the Post-ICU Context.

IF 6 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Critical Care Medicine Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-13 DOI:10.1097/CCM.0000000000006596
Leslie P Scheunemann, Janelle J Christensen, Erica M Motter, S Peter Kim, Peter Eisenhauer, Nimit Gandhi, Heather Tomko, Kelly M Potter, Timothy D Girard, Charles F Reynolds, Natalie E Leland
{"title":"Ableism After Critical Illness: A Qualitative Translation of Key Concepts to the Post-ICU Context.","authors":"Leslie P Scheunemann, Janelle J Christensen, Erica M Motter, S Peter Kim, Peter Eisenhauer, Nimit Gandhi, Heather Tomko, Kelly M Potter, Timothy D Girard, Charles F Reynolds, Natalie E Leland","doi":"10.1097/CCM.0000000000006596","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Ableism-discrimination and social prejudice against people with disabilities-defines people by their disability and assumes that disabled people require fixing. We sought to characterize ableism after critical illness and to describe its relationship with care delivery.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A secondary analysis of semi-structured individual interviews ( n = 42) and ten group interviews ( n = 68 participants) using modified grounded theory. We identified categories of ableism informed by existing disability studies literature and used patterns in the analysis to describe overarching themes.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>A large healthcare system in western Pennsylvania.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Critical illness survivors, family members, clinicians, and administrators.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>None.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>Two overarching themes emerged: ableism presents multifaceted barriers to participation in meaningful activities after critical illness, and it is endemic. We observed examples of ableism in all interviews. The quotes characterizing ableism fell into six categories: 1) infantilization and patronization; 2) disability leading to inability; 3) denial of disability experience; 4) invasion of privacy and denial of meaningful relationships; 5) being ignored and excluded; and 6) pushing care providers beyond their perceived capacity. When participants expressed ableism toward others, it was typically matter-of-fact; however, when participants described experiencing or witnessing ableism, they expressed feelings ranging from anxiety to outrage. Participants explicitly and implicitly connected expressions of ableism to broader policies and practices, providing evidence that ableism is endemic to this healthcare system.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Ableism presents multifaceted barriers to participation after critical illness, undermining resilience and wellbeing. We hypothesize that anti-ableist interventions could reduce disability-related barriers to resilience to optimize recovery after critical illness.</p>","PeriodicalId":10765,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"e829-e838"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12750450/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000006596","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Ableism-discrimination and social prejudice against people with disabilities-defines people by their disability and assumes that disabled people require fixing. We sought to characterize ableism after critical illness and to describe its relationship with care delivery.

Design: A secondary analysis of semi-structured individual interviews ( n = 42) and ten group interviews ( n = 68 participants) using modified grounded theory. We identified categories of ableism informed by existing disability studies literature and used patterns in the analysis to describe overarching themes.

Setting: A large healthcare system in western Pennsylvania.

Participants: Critical illness survivors, family members, clinicians, and administrators.

Interventions: None.

Measurements and main results: Two overarching themes emerged: ableism presents multifaceted barriers to participation in meaningful activities after critical illness, and it is endemic. We observed examples of ableism in all interviews. The quotes characterizing ableism fell into six categories: 1) infantilization and patronization; 2) disability leading to inability; 3) denial of disability experience; 4) invasion of privacy and denial of meaningful relationships; 5) being ignored and excluded; and 6) pushing care providers beyond their perceived capacity. When participants expressed ableism toward others, it was typically matter-of-fact; however, when participants described experiencing or witnessing ableism, they expressed feelings ranging from anxiety to outrage. Participants explicitly and implicitly connected expressions of ableism to broader policies and practices, providing evidence that ableism is endemic to this healthcare system.

Conclusions: Ableism presents multifaceted barriers to participation after critical illness, undermining resilience and wellbeing. We hypothesize that anti-ableist interventions could reduce disability-related barriers to resilience to optimize recovery after critical illness.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
重病后残疾:关键概念对后icu语境的定性翻译。
目的:残疾——对残疾人的歧视和社会偏见——以残疾人的残疾来定义人,并假定残疾人需要矫正。我们试图描述危重疾病后的残疾特征,并描述其与护理服务的关系。设计:采用改进的扎根理论对半结构化的个人访谈(n = 42)和10个小组访谈(n = 68)进行二次分析。我们根据现有的残疾研究文献确定了残疾歧视的类别,并在分析中使用模式来描述总体主题。背景:宾夕法尼亚州西部的大型医疗保健系统。参与者:危重疾病幸存者,家庭成员,临床医生和管理人员。干预措施:没有。测量结果和主要结果:出现了两个主要主题:残疾歧视对重病后参与有意义的活动构成多方面的障碍;残疾歧视是地方性的。我们在所有的访谈中都观察到残疾歧视的例子。表征残疾歧视的语录有六类:1)幼稚化、居高临下;2)残疾导致残疾;3)否认残疾经历;4)侵犯隐私,否认有意义的关系;5)被忽视和排斥;6)迫使医护人员超出他们的认知能力。当参与者对他人表达残疾歧视时,这通常是实事求是的;然而,当参与者描述经历或目睹残疾歧视时,他们表达了从焦虑到愤怒的感受。参与者明确或隐含地将残疾歧视的表达与更广泛的政策和实践联系起来,提供证据表明残疾歧视是这个医疗系统的地方性问题。结论:残疾歧视给重病后的参与带来了多方面的障碍,破坏了恢复力和幸福感。我们假设抗残疾干预可以减少残疾相关的恢复障碍,以优化危重疾病后的恢复。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Critical Care Medicine
Critical Care Medicine 医学-危重病医学
CiteScore
16.30
自引率
5.70%
发文量
728
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Critical Care Medicine is the premier peer-reviewed, scientific publication in critical care medicine. Directed to those specialists who treat patients in the ICU and CCU, including chest physicians, surgeons, pediatricians, pharmacists/pharmacologists, anesthesiologists, critical care nurses, and other healthcare professionals, Critical Care Medicine covers all aspects of acute and emergency care for the critically ill or injured patient. Each issue presents critical care practitioners with clinical breakthroughs that lead to better patient care, the latest news on promising research, and advances in equipment and techniques.
期刊最新文献
International Incidence of Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest in Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Epidemiological Studies. Factors Associated With R01 Submission Among Pediatric Critical Care Medicine Career Development Award Recipients. Institutional Variability in Brain-Dead Organ Donation Processes and Practices: A Multicenter Cohort Study. Inhaled Antibiotics for Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia: Is It Ready for Prime Time? Sepsis by Sunrise, Improved Prognosis by the Second Day: What the Phoenix Criteria Contribute to PICU Practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1