Daily SARS-CoV-2 testing after travel-related close contact notifications during elite sporting events hosted in the UK: a longitudinal study.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM BMJ Open Respiratory Research Pub Date : 2025-02-12 DOI:10.1136/bmjresp-2023-001912
Madeleine Davies, Jerry Hill, Luke Goggins, Nicholas Peirce, Jenifer Smith, Matthew Boulter, Tom Alan Fowler, Iain Buchan, James D F Calder
{"title":"Daily SARS-CoV-2 testing after travel-related close contact notifications during elite sporting events hosted in the UK: a longitudinal study.","authors":"Madeleine Davies, Jerry Hill, Luke Goggins, Nicholas Peirce, Jenifer Smith, Matthew Boulter, Tom Alan Fowler, Iain Buchan, James D F Calder","doi":"10.1136/bmjresp-2023-001912","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Isolation requirements for COVID-19 close contacts risked discouraging elite athletes and support staff from travelling to international sports events hosted in the UK during 2021.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The purpose of this study, in collaboration with the UK Health Security Agency, was to develop and implement a risk assessment and workplace daily testing approach in elite sporting events, for individuals who would otherwise be excluded by quarantine.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Longitudinal study of athletes and staff identified as close contacts during travel (ie, flights, train) to specific international sports events. A risk assessment was undertaken, and participants were categorised as at 'low' or 'high' risk of developing SARS-CoV-2 based on their exposure circumstances. High-risk individuals remained in 10-day isolation, whereas those of low risk underwent daily symptom and lateral flow testing, enhanced workplace mitigation and selected work activities were permitted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 29 514 event personnel, 202 travel-related close contacts were reported to the study team, of which 126 were eligible from 40 events in 7 sports. Of the individuals assessed, 105 (83.3%) were classified as low risk, while 21 (16.7%) were classified as high risk. No low-risk individuals tested positive in over 280 rapid antigen tests.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>International sports events rely on athlete and support staff availability, with economic consequences of event cancellation or postponement. Our study showed no detection of SARS-CoV-2 in low-risk close contacts, and enabled their sustained participation. This multidisciplinary intervention appears to have been effective, enabling large-scale event continuation, while minimising risk to athletes, employees and the wider public.</p>","PeriodicalId":9048,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Respiratory Research","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11822419/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Respiratory Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjresp-2023-001912","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Isolation requirements for COVID-19 close contacts risked discouraging elite athletes and support staff from travelling to international sports events hosted in the UK during 2021.

Objectives: The purpose of this study, in collaboration with the UK Health Security Agency, was to develop and implement a risk assessment and workplace daily testing approach in elite sporting events, for individuals who would otherwise be excluded by quarantine.

Methods: Longitudinal study of athletes and staff identified as close contacts during travel (ie, flights, train) to specific international sports events. A risk assessment was undertaken, and participants were categorised as at 'low' or 'high' risk of developing SARS-CoV-2 based on their exposure circumstances. High-risk individuals remained in 10-day isolation, whereas those of low risk underwent daily symptom and lateral flow testing, enhanced workplace mitigation and selected work activities were permitted.

Results: Of 29 514 event personnel, 202 travel-related close contacts were reported to the study team, of which 126 were eligible from 40 events in 7 sports. Of the individuals assessed, 105 (83.3%) were classified as low risk, while 21 (16.7%) were classified as high risk. No low-risk individuals tested positive in over 280 rapid antigen tests.

Conclusion: International sports events rely on athlete and support staff availability, with economic consequences of event cancellation or postponement. Our study showed no detection of SARS-CoV-2 in low-risk close contacts, and enabled their sustained participation. This multidisciplinary intervention appears to have been effective, enabling large-scale event continuation, while minimising risk to athletes, employees and the wider public.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在英国举办的精英体育赛事期间,在通报与旅行有关的密切接触者后,每天进行SARS-CoV-2检测:一项纵向研究。
对COVID-19密切接触者的隔离要求可能会阻碍优秀运动员和支持人员前往2021年在英国举办的国际体育赛事。目的:本研究的目的是与英国卫生安全局合作,在精英体育赛事中制定和实施风险评估和工作场所日常检测方法,否则将被隔离在外的个人。方法:对在参加特定国际体育赛事的旅行(即飞机、火车)中被确定为密切接触者的运动员和工作人员进行纵向研究。进行了风险评估,并根据参与者的暴露情况将其分为患SARS-CoV-2的“低”或“高”风险。高风险个体仍被隔离10天,而低风险个体则接受每日症状和侧流检测,并允许加强工作场所缓解和选定的工作活动。结果:在29 514名赛事人员中,研究组报告了202名与旅行相关的密切接触者,其中126名符合条件,来自7个体育项目的40个项目。低危105人(83.3%),高危21人(16.7%)。在280多项快速抗原检测中,无低危个体呈阳性。结论:国际体育赛事依赖于运动员和支持人员的可用性,赛事取消或推迟会带来经济后果。我们的研究显示,在低风险密切接触者中未检测到SARS-CoV-2,并使他们能够持续参与。这种多学科干预似乎是有效的,使大型赛事得以延续,同时将运动员、员工和广大公众的风险降至最低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Open Respiratory Research
BMJ Open Respiratory Research RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
2.40%
发文量
95
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Open Respiratory Research is a peer-reviewed, open access journal publishing respiratory and critical care medicine. It is the sister journal to Thorax and co-owned by the British Thoracic Society and BMJ. The journal focuses on robustness of methodology and scientific rigour with less emphasis on novelty or perceived impact. BMJ Open Respiratory Research operates a rapid review process, with continuous publication online, ensuring timely, up-to-date research is available worldwide. The journal publishes review articles and all research study types: Basic science including laboratory based experiments and animal models, Pilot studies or proof of concept, Observational studies, Study protocols, Registries, Clinical trials from phase I to multicentre randomised clinical trials, Systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
期刊最新文献
Predicting low oxygen in patients with acute COVID-19 infection isolating at home: a clinical prediction model. Impact of breathing frequency on respiratory oscillometry measurements: a randomised cross-over and observational study of asthma patients. Influence of basal physical activity and air quality on a walking programme in patients with COPD. Elevated serum peroxiredoxin 1 is a biomarker of multiorgan failure in ARDS. Economic evaluation of single-inhaler triple therapy for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in Thailand.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1