Realistic fundus photograph generation for improving automated disease classification.

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY British Journal of Ophthalmology Pub Date : 2025-02-12 DOI:10.1136/bjo-2024-326122
Prashant U Pandey, Jonathan A Micieli, Stephan Ong Tone, Kenneth T Eng, Peter J Kertes, Jovi C Y Wong
{"title":"Realistic fundus photograph generation for improving automated disease classification.","authors":"Prashant U Pandey, Jonathan A Micieli, Stephan Ong Tone, Kenneth T Eng, Peter J Kertes, Jovi C Y Wong","doi":"10.1136/bjo-2024-326122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>This study aims to investigate whether denoising diffusion probabilistic models (DDPMs) could generate realistic retinal images, and if they could be used to improve the performance of a deep convolutional neural network (CNN) ensemble for multiple retinal disease classification, which was previously shown to outperform human experts.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We trained DDPMs to generate retinal fundus images representing diabetic retinopathy, age-related macular degeneration, glaucoma or normal eyes. Eight board-certified ophthalmologists evaluated 96 test images to assess the realism of generated images and classified them based on disease labels. Subsequently, between 100 and 1000 generated images were employed to augment training of deep convolutional ensembles for classifying retinal disease. We measured the accuracy of ophthalmologists in correctly identifying real and generated images. We also measured the classification accuracy, F-score and area under the receiver operating curve of a trained CNN in classifying retinal diseases from a test set of 100 fundus images.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ophthalmologists exhibited a mean accuracy of 61.1% (range: 51.0%-68.8%) in differentiating real and generated images. Augmenting the training set with 238 generated images in the smallest class statistically significantly improved the F-score and accuracy by 5.3% and 5.8%, respectively (p<0.01) in a retinal disease classification task, compared with a baseline model trained only with real images.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Latent diffusion models generated highly realistic retinal images, as validated by human experts. Adding generated images to the training set improved performance of a CNN ensemble without requiring additional real patient data.</p>","PeriodicalId":9313,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo-2024-326122","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: This study aims to investigate whether denoising diffusion probabilistic models (DDPMs) could generate realistic retinal images, and if they could be used to improve the performance of a deep convolutional neural network (CNN) ensemble for multiple retinal disease classification, which was previously shown to outperform human experts.

Methods: We trained DDPMs to generate retinal fundus images representing diabetic retinopathy, age-related macular degeneration, glaucoma or normal eyes. Eight board-certified ophthalmologists evaluated 96 test images to assess the realism of generated images and classified them based on disease labels. Subsequently, between 100 and 1000 generated images were employed to augment training of deep convolutional ensembles for classifying retinal disease. We measured the accuracy of ophthalmologists in correctly identifying real and generated images. We also measured the classification accuracy, F-score and area under the receiver operating curve of a trained CNN in classifying retinal diseases from a test set of 100 fundus images.

Results: Ophthalmologists exhibited a mean accuracy of 61.1% (range: 51.0%-68.8%) in differentiating real and generated images. Augmenting the training set with 238 generated images in the smallest class statistically significantly improved the F-score and accuracy by 5.3% and 5.8%, respectively (p<0.01) in a retinal disease classification task, compared with a baseline model trained only with real images.

Conclusions: Latent diffusion models generated highly realistic retinal images, as validated by human experts. Adding generated images to the training set improved performance of a CNN ensemble without requiring additional real patient data.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
2.40%
发文量
213
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Ophthalmology (BJO) is an international peer-reviewed journal for ophthalmologists and visual science specialists. BJO publishes clinical investigations, clinical observations, and clinically relevant laboratory investigations related to ophthalmology. It also provides major reviews and also publishes manuscripts covering regional issues in a global context.
期刊最新文献
Realistic fundus photograph generation for improving automated disease classification. Incidence, sociodemographic and presenting clinical features of childhood non-infectious uveitis: findings from the UK national inception cohort study. Associations between a healthy lifestyle score and retinal neurovascular health. Associations between serum lipids and glaucoma: a cohort study of 400 229 UK Biobank participants. High-sensitivity C-reactive protein and risk of retinal artery occlusion and ischaemic stroke: a cross-cohort study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1