Health Care Disparities and Critical Illnesses-Related Mortality in the United States.

IF 6 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Critical Care Medicine Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-13 DOI:10.1097/CCM.0000000000006620
Yu-Che Lee, Francois Fadell, Ko-Yun Chang, Jessica Baek, Muhaimen Rahman, Corrine Kickel, Ali El-Solh
{"title":"Health Care Disparities and Critical Illnesses-Related Mortality in the United States.","authors":"Yu-Che Lee, Francois Fadell, Ko-Yun Chang, Jessica Baek, Muhaimen Rahman, Corrine Kickel, Ali El-Solh","doi":"10.1097/CCM.0000000000006620","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To examine the association between social vulnerability index (SVI) and social deprivation index (SDI) with critical illness-related mortality in the United States and to guide future research and interventions aimed at reducing disparities in outcomes in patients with critical illness.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A cross-sectional study using county-level data.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>United States with data sourced from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Wide-Ranging Online Data for Epidemiologic Research and the American Community Survey.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>County-level populations of all ages across the United States from 2015 to 2019.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>None.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>Age-adjusted mortality rates for four categories of critical illnesses (respiratory, cardiac, neurologic, and renal/gastrointestinal) were analyzed against the county-level SVI and SDI. We assessed critical illness-related mortality associated with SVI and SDI through negative binomial regression models. Mortality rates per 100,000 were highest for cardiac (212.4; 95% CI, 212.2-212.6), followed by respiratory (116.8; 95% CI, 116.7-117.0), neurologic (30.8; 95% CI, 30.8-30.9), and renal/gastrointestinal illnesses (25.2; 95% CI, 25.1-25.3). Mortality was greater among adults 65 years old and older, males, Black or African American individuals, and those living in rural areas. Higher SVI and SDI were associated with increased mortality, with the strongest correlation found for cardiac critical illnesses, showing rate ratios of 1.52 (95% CI, 1.48-1.57) for SDI and 1.43 (95% CI, 1.39-1.47) for SVI. Specific diagnoses with the highest incidence rate ratios included sepsis (1.63 [95% CI, 1.58-1.69] for SVI and 1.75 [95% CI, 1.70-1.80] for SDI), cardiac arrest (1.92 [95% CI, 1.80-2.04] for SVI and 1.98 [95% CI, 1.86-2.10] for SDI), anoxic brain damage (1.62 [95% CI, 1.45-1.81] for SVI and 1.60 [95% CI, 1.45-1.76] for SDI), and acute hepatic failure (1.51 [95% CI, 0.92-2.46] for SVI and 1.49 [95% CI, 1.08-2.05] for SDI). The SDI demonstrated a stronger correlation with mortality compared with the SVI, with socioeconomic status, poverty, education, and unemployment being the most impactful indicators.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Critical illness mortality is significantly associated with indicators of socioeconomic disadvantage. The SDI appears to be a more effective tool than the SVI for guiding resource allocation. Targeted interventions to address social determinants of health, including poverty, education, and unemployment, are essential to reduce disparities and improve outcomes in patients with critical illness. Public health strategies should focus on addressing these social determinants and enhancing support for vulnerable populations and areas.</p>","PeriodicalId":10765,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"e992-e997"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000006620","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To examine the association between social vulnerability index (SVI) and social deprivation index (SDI) with critical illness-related mortality in the United States and to guide future research and interventions aimed at reducing disparities in outcomes in patients with critical illness.

Design: A cross-sectional study using county-level data.

Setting: United States with data sourced from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Wide-Ranging Online Data for Epidemiologic Research and the American Community Survey.

Patients: County-level populations of all ages across the United States from 2015 to 2019.

Interventions: None.

Measurements and main results: Age-adjusted mortality rates for four categories of critical illnesses (respiratory, cardiac, neurologic, and renal/gastrointestinal) were analyzed against the county-level SVI and SDI. We assessed critical illness-related mortality associated with SVI and SDI through negative binomial regression models. Mortality rates per 100,000 were highest for cardiac (212.4; 95% CI, 212.2-212.6), followed by respiratory (116.8; 95% CI, 116.7-117.0), neurologic (30.8; 95% CI, 30.8-30.9), and renal/gastrointestinal illnesses (25.2; 95% CI, 25.1-25.3). Mortality was greater among adults 65 years old and older, males, Black or African American individuals, and those living in rural areas. Higher SVI and SDI were associated with increased mortality, with the strongest correlation found for cardiac critical illnesses, showing rate ratios of 1.52 (95% CI, 1.48-1.57) for SDI and 1.43 (95% CI, 1.39-1.47) for SVI. Specific diagnoses with the highest incidence rate ratios included sepsis (1.63 [95% CI, 1.58-1.69] for SVI and 1.75 [95% CI, 1.70-1.80] for SDI), cardiac arrest (1.92 [95% CI, 1.80-2.04] for SVI and 1.98 [95% CI, 1.86-2.10] for SDI), anoxic brain damage (1.62 [95% CI, 1.45-1.81] for SVI and 1.60 [95% CI, 1.45-1.76] for SDI), and acute hepatic failure (1.51 [95% CI, 0.92-2.46] for SVI and 1.49 [95% CI, 1.08-2.05] for SDI). The SDI demonstrated a stronger correlation with mortality compared with the SVI, with socioeconomic status, poverty, education, and unemployment being the most impactful indicators.

Conclusions: Critical illness mortality is significantly associated with indicators of socioeconomic disadvantage. The SDI appears to be a more effective tool than the SVI for guiding resource allocation. Targeted interventions to address social determinants of health, including poverty, education, and unemployment, are essential to reduce disparities and improve outcomes in patients with critical illness. Public health strategies should focus on addressing these social determinants and enhancing support for vulnerable populations and areas.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国医疗保健差距和危重疾病相关死亡率
目的:研究美国社会脆弱性指数(SVI)和社会剥夺指数(SDI)与危重疾病相关死亡率之间的关系,并指导未来的研究和干预措施,旨在减少危重疾病患者结局的差异。设计:采用县级数据的横断面研究。环境:美国,数据来自疾病控制和预防中心广泛的流行病学研究在线数据和美国社区调查。患者:2015年至2019年美国所有年龄段的县级人口。干预措施:没有。测量结果和主要结果:根据县级SVI和SDI分析了四类危重疾病(呼吸系统、心脏、神经系统和肾脏/胃肠道)的年龄调整死亡率。我们通过负二项回归模型评估与SVI和SDI相关的危重疾病相关死亡率。每10万人中心脏病死亡率最高(212.4;95% CI, 212.2-212.6),其次是呼吸系统(116.8;95% CI, 116.7-117.0),神经学(30.8;95% CI, 30.8-30.9)和肾脏/胃肠道疾病(25.2;95% ci, 25.1-25.3)。65岁及以上的成年人、男性、黑人或非裔美国人以及生活在农村地区的人的死亡率更高。较高的SVI和SDI与死亡率增加相关,与心脏危重疾病的相关性最强,SDI的比率为1.52 (95% CI, 1.48-1.57), SVI的比率为1.43 (95% CI, 1.39-1.47)。发病率最高的具体诊断包括败血症(SVI为1.63 [95% CI, 1.58-1.69], SDI为1.75 [95% CI, 1.70-1.80])、心脏骤停(SVI为1.92 [95% CI, 1.80-2.04], SDI为1.98 [95% CI, 1.86-2.10])、缺氧脑损伤(SVI为1.62 [95% CI, 1.45-1.81], SDI为1.60 [95% CI, 1.45-1.76])和急性肝衰竭(SVI为1.51 [95% CI, 0.92-2.46], SDI为1.49 [95% CI, 1.08-2.05])。与SVI相比,SDI与死亡率的相关性更强,其中社会经济地位、贫困、教育和失业是最具影响力的指标。结论:危重疾病死亡率与社会经济劣势指标显著相关。在指导资源分配方面,SDI似乎是比SVI更有效的工具。针对健康问题的社会决定因素(包括贫困、教育和失业)采取有针对性的干预措施,对于缩小差距和改善重症患者的预后至关重要。公共卫生战略应侧重于解决这些社会决定因素并加强对脆弱人口和地区的支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Critical Care Medicine
Critical Care Medicine 医学-危重病医学
CiteScore
16.30
自引率
5.70%
发文量
728
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Critical Care Medicine is the premier peer-reviewed, scientific publication in critical care medicine. Directed to those specialists who treat patients in the ICU and CCU, including chest physicians, surgeons, pediatricians, pharmacists/pharmacologists, anesthesiologists, critical care nurses, and other healthcare professionals, Critical Care Medicine covers all aspects of acute and emergency care for the critically ill or injured patient. Each issue presents critical care practitioners with clinical breakthroughs that lead to better patient care, the latest news on promising research, and advances in equipment and techniques.
期刊最新文献
The Influence of Older Age on RBC Transfusion Decisions in ICU Patients. Power, Duration, and Compliance: Reframing Risk of Ventilatory-Induced Lung Injury With the Risk-Adjusted Mechanical-Power Score. Defining the Resolution of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Delphi Consensus Study. An Examination of Organ Donor Hemodynamic Variation and Warm Ischemic Times Stratified by Functional Thresholds. Physiological Effects of High-Flow Nasal Oxygen Compared With Conventional Oxygen Therapy: A Randomized Trial in Postextubation Patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1