Integrated effects of microbial culture and nitrogen application on phytoremediation, physiology and growth of maize in glyphosate-contaminated soil.

IF 3.4 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES International Journal of Phytoremediation Pub Date : 2025-02-13 DOI:10.1080/15226514.2025.2464625
Muhammad Imran Khan, Qammar Farooq, Mujahid Ali, Muhammad Hayder Ali, Muhammad Naveed
{"title":"Integrated effects of microbial culture and nitrogen application on phytoremediation, physiology and growth of maize in glyphosate-contaminated soil.","authors":"Muhammad Imran Khan, Qammar Farooq, Mujahid Ali, Muhammad Hayder Ali, Muhammad Naveed","doi":"10.1080/15226514.2025.2464625","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Glyphosate can disrupt the food chain and harm non-target organisms, highlighting the need to remediate contaminated soils. This study sought to determine the efficacy of co-applying mixed microbial culture (MMC) and two different levels of nitrogen (50% and 100%) in glyphosate-contaminated soil (800 mg/kg) and to assess their role in maize (<i>Zea mays</i> L.) growth and physiology and glyphosate uptake by plants and removal from soil. The results showed that glyphosate posed significant phytotoxicity to maize plants by causing up to 43.7-91.5%, 8.60-54.3%, and 13.2-51.6% reduction in nutrient uptake, physiological, and growth attributes of maize plants in glyphosate-contaminated soil, respectively. The co-application of MMC and the recommended dose of 100% nitrogen significantly improved the agronomic (24.6-55.0%), nutrient uptake (37.4-90.0%), and physiological (16.9-54.0%) attributes of maize plants as compared to unamended contaminated controls. Although the individual application of MMC or N was effective in improving glyphosate removal from the soil, their co-application further enhanced this effect by removing glyphosate 85.8% higher than the respective control. This research strategy contributes to sustainable development goal 2 (zero-hunger) and 15 (life on land) by enhancing food production, remediating contaminated soil, and restoring the ecosystem.</p>","PeriodicalId":14235,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Phytoremediation","volume":" ","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Phytoremediation","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15226514.2025.2464625","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Glyphosate can disrupt the food chain and harm non-target organisms, highlighting the need to remediate contaminated soils. This study sought to determine the efficacy of co-applying mixed microbial culture (MMC) and two different levels of nitrogen (50% and 100%) in glyphosate-contaminated soil (800 mg/kg) and to assess their role in maize (Zea mays L.) growth and physiology and glyphosate uptake by plants and removal from soil. The results showed that glyphosate posed significant phytotoxicity to maize plants by causing up to 43.7-91.5%, 8.60-54.3%, and 13.2-51.6% reduction in nutrient uptake, physiological, and growth attributes of maize plants in glyphosate-contaminated soil, respectively. The co-application of MMC and the recommended dose of 100% nitrogen significantly improved the agronomic (24.6-55.0%), nutrient uptake (37.4-90.0%), and physiological (16.9-54.0%) attributes of maize plants as compared to unamended contaminated controls. Although the individual application of MMC or N was effective in improving glyphosate removal from the soil, their co-application further enhanced this effect by removing glyphosate 85.8% higher than the respective control. This research strategy contributes to sustainable development goal 2 (zero-hunger) and 15 (life on land) by enhancing food production, remediating contaminated soil, and restoring the ecosystem.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Phytoremediation
International Journal of Phytoremediation 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
5.40%
发文量
145
审稿时长
3.4 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Phytoremediation (IJP) is the first journal devoted to the publication of laboratory and field research describing the use of plant systems to solve environmental problems by enabling the remediation of soil, water, and air quality and by restoring ecosystem services in managed landscapes. Traditional phytoremediation has largely focused on soil and groundwater clean-up of hazardous contaminants. Phytotechnology expands this umbrella to include many of the natural resource management challenges we face in cities, on farms, and other landscapes more integrated with daily public activities. Wetlands that treat wastewater, rain gardens that treat stormwater, poplar tree plantings that contain pollutants, urban tree canopies that treat air pollution, and specialized plants that treat decommissioned mine sites are just a few examples of phytotechnologies.
期刊最新文献
Profiling and metabolic analysis of microorganisms in bioretention cells vegetated with vetiver and cattail species treating nitrogen and phosphorous. Utilizing NPKS fertilizer for the enhancement of Pennisetum purpureum growth and phytoremediation of arsenic in treatment wetland. Integrated effects of microbial culture and nitrogen application on phytoremediation, physiology and growth of maize in glyphosate-contaminated soil. Cell wall modifications in roots of in vitro grown Douglas-fir plantlets exposed to aluminum. Remediating contaminated environmental systems: the role of plants in cadmium removal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1