Characteristics and outcomes of patients with and without statin-associated muscle symptoms treated with bempedoic acid in the CLEAR Outcomes trial

IF 4.6 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Journal of clinical lipidology Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-25 DOI:10.1016/j.jacl.2024.12.014
Ulrich Laufs MD, PhD , A. Michael Lincoff MD , Stephen J. Nicholls MBBS, PhD , Na Li PhD , LeAnne Bloedon MS , William J. Sasiela PhD , Heather A. Powell PharmD , Peter M. Herout PharmD , Paul D. Thompson MD , Steven E. Nissen MD
{"title":"Characteristics and outcomes of patients with and without statin-associated muscle symptoms treated with bempedoic acid in the CLEAR Outcomes trial","authors":"Ulrich Laufs MD, PhD ,&nbsp;A. Michael Lincoff MD ,&nbsp;Stephen J. Nicholls MBBS, PhD ,&nbsp;Na Li PhD ,&nbsp;LeAnne Bloedon MS ,&nbsp;William J. Sasiela PhD ,&nbsp;Heather A. Powell PharmD ,&nbsp;Peter M. Herout PharmD ,&nbsp;Paul D. Thompson MD ,&nbsp;Steven E. Nissen MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jacl.2024.12.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>BACKGROUND</h3><div>Cholesterol Lowering via bEmpedoic Acid Regimen (CLEAR) outcomes, a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled cardiovascular outcomes trial, and the largest prospective database of patients with statin intolerance (SI), demonstrated that bempedoic acid reduces low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and cardiovascular risk in patients at high cardiovascular risk.</div></div><div><h3>OBJECTIVE</h3><div>Assess baseline differences in SI symptoms and whether these influenced the clinical course during CLEAR outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>METHODS</h3><div>Symptoms and impact of SI on daily living were recorded prior to randomization. This posthoc analysis grouped patients as reporting statin-associated muscle symptoms only (SAMS), nonmuscle adverse effects only (nonSAMS), or BOTH.</div></div><div><h3>RESULTS</h3><div>Of the 13,970 patients at baseline, 49% reported SAMS, 18% nonSAMS, and 33% BOTH. Moderate/severe impact on daily living was recorded for 62% SAMS, 48% nonSAMS, and 69% BOTH. Baseline lipid modifying treatment (LMT) was used in 43% SAMS, 36% nonSAMS, and 42% BOTH. Drop-in use of moderate/high-intensity statin at any time during the study was higher in the placebo group in all SI groups and higher in SAMS and BOTH vs nonSAMS, but was not generally maintained at study end. SAMS and BOTH groups had more muscle symptoms and higher rates of treatment discontinuation vs. nonSAMS but there was no difference between treatments.</div></div><div><h3>CONCLUSION</h3><div>Patients who reported SAMS, regardless of randomization to bempedoic acid or placebo, had higher rates of discontinuation, higher rates of skeletal muscle symptoms, and a greater percentage of patients to attempt statin rechallenge. These findings indicate patients with history of SAMS may have background factors impacting their tolerance to LMT and may require more focused clinical management.</div></div><div><h3>ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier</h3><div>NCT02993406</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15392,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical lipidology","volume":"19 2","pages":"Pages 337-347"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical lipidology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1933287424003003","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cholesterol Lowering via bEmpedoic Acid Regimen (CLEAR) outcomes, a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled cardiovascular outcomes trial, and the largest prospective database of patients with statin intolerance (SI), demonstrated that bempedoic acid reduces low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and cardiovascular risk in patients at high cardiovascular risk.

OBJECTIVE

Assess baseline differences in SI symptoms and whether these influenced the clinical course during CLEAR outcomes.

METHODS

Symptoms and impact of SI on daily living were recorded prior to randomization. This posthoc analysis grouped patients as reporting statin-associated muscle symptoms only (SAMS), nonmuscle adverse effects only (nonSAMS), or BOTH.

RESULTS

Of the 13,970 patients at baseline, 49% reported SAMS, 18% nonSAMS, and 33% BOTH. Moderate/severe impact on daily living was recorded for 62% SAMS, 48% nonSAMS, and 69% BOTH. Baseline lipid modifying treatment (LMT) was used in 43% SAMS, 36% nonSAMS, and 42% BOTH. Drop-in use of moderate/high-intensity statin at any time during the study was higher in the placebo group in all SI groups and higher in SAMS and BOTH vs nonSAMS, but was not generally maintained at study end. SAMS and BOTH groups had more muscle symptoms and higher rates of treatment discontinuation vs. nonSAMS but there was no difference between treatments.

CONCLUSION

Patients who reported SAMS, regardless of randomization to bempedoic acid or placebo, had higher rates of discontinuation, higher rates of skeletal muscle symptoms, and a greater percentage of patients to attempt statin rechallenge. These findings indicate patients with history of SAMS may have background factors impacting their tolerance to LMT and may require more focused clinical management.

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier

NCT02993406

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
CLEAR outcomes试验中有和无他汀类药物相关肌肉症状的患者的特征和结果
背景:通过本培多酸方案降低胆固醇(CLEAR)结果,一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照的心血管结局试验,以及最大的他汀类药物不耐受(SI)患者前瞻性数据库,证明本培多酸可以降低高心血管风险患者的低密度脂蛋白胆固醇和心血管风险。目的:评估SI症状的基线差异,以及这些差异是否影响CLEAR结果期间的临床过程。方法:在随机分组前记录SI的症状和对日常生活的影响。这项事后分析将患者分为仅报告他汀类药物相关肌肉症状(SAMS)、仅报告非肌肉不良反应(nonSAMS)或两者兼而有之。结果:在基线的13970例患者中,49%报告了SAMS, 18%报告了非SAMS, 33%报告了两者。62%的SAMS, 48%的non - SAMS和69%的两者都记录了中度/严重的日常生活影响。基线脂质修饰治疗(LMT)用于43%的SAMS, 36%的非SAMS和42%的两者。在所有SI组中,安慰剂组在研究期间的任何时间使用中/高强度他汀类药物的比例较高,SAMS组和BOTH组均高于非SAMS组,但在研究结束时并未普遍维持。与非SAMS组相比,SAMS组和两组有更多的肌肉症状和更高的停药率,但治疗之间没有差异。结论:报告SAMS的患者,无论随机分配到苯足酸组还是安慰剂组,停药率更高,骨骼肌症状率更高,尝试他汀类药物再挑战的患者比例更高。这些发现表明,有SAMS病史的患者可能有影响其对LMT耐受性的背景因素,可能需要更集中的临床管理。临床试验:Gov标识符:NCT02993406。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
6.80%
发文量
209
审稿时长
49 days
期刊介绍: Because the scope of clinical lipidology is broad, the topics addressed by the Journal are equally diverse. Typical articles explore lipidology as it is practiced in the treatment setting, recent developments in pharmacological research, reports of treatment and trials, case studies, the impact of lifestyle modification, and similar academic material of interest to the practitioner. Sections of Journal of clinical lipidology will address pioneering studies and the clinicians who conduct them, case studies, ethical standards and conduct, professional guidance such as ATP and NCEP, editorial commentary, letters from readers, National Lipid Association (NLA) news and upcoming event information, as well as abstracts from the NLA annual scientific sessions and the scientific forums held by its chapters, when appropriate.
期刊最新文献
Association between remnant cholesterol and stroke among patients with atrial fibrillation: A population-based cohort study. ApoA-1 versus HDL-C as markers of cardiovascular risk. The association between vitamin B12 and lipid metabolism in patients with ischemic stroke: A cross-sectional study. Comparative efficacy and safety of obicetrapib vs bempedoic acid on top of statin therapy: A network meta-analysis. Effects of pemafibrate on liver fibrosis in patients with MASLD and hypertriglyceridemia: A 2-year retrospective observational study using MR elastography.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1