Ulrich Laufs, A Michael Lincoff, Stephen J Nicholls, Na Li, LeAnne Bloedon, William J Sasiela, Heather A Powell, Peter M Herout, Paul D Thompson, Steven E Nissen
{"title":"Characteristics and outcomes of patients with and without statin-associated muscle symptoms treated with bempedoic acid in the CLEAR Outcomes trial.","authors":"Ulrich Laufs, A Michael Lincoff, Stephen J Nicholls, Na Li, LeAnne Bloedon, William J Sasiela, Heather A Powell, Peter M Herout, Paul D Thompson, Steven E Nissen","doi":"10.1016/j.jacl.2024.12.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cholesterol Lowering via bEmpedoic Acid Regimen (CLEAR) outcomes, a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled cardiovascular outcomes trial, and the largest prospective database of patients with statin intolerance (SI), demonstrated that bempedoic acid reduces low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and cardiovascular risk in patients at high cardiovascular risk.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Assess baseline differences in SI symptoms and whether these influenced the clinical course during CLEAR outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Symptoms and impact of SI on daily living were recorded prior to randomization. This posthoc analysis grouped patients as reporting statin-associated muscle symptoms only (SAMS), nonmuscle adverse effects only (nonSAMS), or BOTH.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 13,970 patients at baseline, 49% reported SAMS, 18% NonSAMS, and 33% BOTH. Moderate/severe impact on daily living was recorded for 62% SAMS, 48% NonSAMS, and 69% BOTH. Baseline lipid modifying treatment (LMT) was used in 43% SAMS, 36% nonSAMS, and 42% BOTH. Drop-in use of moderate/high-intensity statin at any time during the study was higher in the placebo group in all SI groups and higher in SAMS and BOTH vs. nonSAMS, but was not generally maintained at study end. SAMS and BOTH groups had more muscle symptoms and higher rates of treatment discontinuation vs. NonSAMS but there was no difference between treatments.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients who reported SAMS, regardless of randomization to bempedoic acid or placebo, had higher rates of discontinuation, higher rates of skeletal muscle symptoms, and a greater percentage of patients to attempt statin rechallenge. These findings indicate patients with history of SAMS may have background factors impacting their tolerance to LMT and may require more focused clinical management.</p><p><strong>Clinicaltrials: </strong></p><p><strong>Gov identifier: </strong>NCT02993406.</p>","PeriodicalId":15392,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical lipidology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical lipidology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacl.2024.12.014","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Cholesterol Lowering via bEmpedoic Acid Regimen (CLEAR) outcomes, a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled cardiovascular outcomes trial, and the largest prospective database of patients with statin intolerance (SI), demonstrated that bempedoic acid reduces low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and cardiovascular risk in patients at high cardiovascular risk.
Objective: Assess baseline differences in SI symptoms and whether these influenced the clinical course during CLEAR outcomes.
Methods: Symptoms and impact of SI on daily living were recorded prior to randomization. This posthoc analysis grouped patients as reporting statin-associated muscle symptoms only (SAMS), nonmuscle adverse effects only (nonSAMS), or BOTH.
Results: Of the 13,970 patients at baseline, 49% reported SAMS, 18% NonSAMS, and 33% BOTH. Moderate/severe impact on daily living was recorded for 62% SAMS, 48% NonSAMS, and 69% BOTH. Baseline lipid modifying treatment (LMT) was used in 43% SAMS, 36% nonSAMS, and 42% BOTH. Drop-in use of moderate/high-intensity statin at any time during the study was higher in the placebo group in all SI groups and higher in SAMS and BOTH vs. nonSAMS, but was not generally maintained at study end. SAMS and BOTH groups had more muscle symptoms and higher rates of treatment discontinuation vs. NonSAMS but there was no difference between treatments.
Conclusion: Patients who reported SAMS, regardless of randomization to bempedoic acid or placebo, had higher rates of discontinuation, higher rates of skeletal muscle symptoms, and a greater percentage of patients to attempt statin rechallenge. These findings indicate patients with history of SAMS may have background factors impacting their tolerance to LMT and may require more focused clinical management.
期刊介绍:
Because the scope of clinical lipidology is broad, the topics addressed by the Journal are equally diverse. Typical articles explore lipidology as it is practiced in the treatment setting, recent developments in pharmacological research, reports of treatment and trials, case studies, the impact of lifestyle modification, and similar academic material of interest to the practitioner.
Sections of Journal of clinical lipidology will address pioneering studies and the clinicians who conduct them, case studies, ethical standards and conduct, professional guidance such as ATP and NCEP, editorial commentary, letters from readers, National Lipid Association (NLA) news and upcoming event information, as well as abstracts from the NLA annual scientific sessions and the scientific forums held by its chapters, when appropriate.