Lulu Zhang, Xueyan Wang, Dan Wu, Jun Zheng, Fangrui Ding
{"title":"Differentiating the whole urine and urine supernatant protein profiles of preterm infants via urine proteomics.","authors":"Lulu Zhang, Xueyan Wang, Dan Wu, Jun Zheng, Fangrui Ding","doi":"10.1159/000543714","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Introduction Urine proteomics plays an important role in the screening of biomarkers for infant diseases. However, there is no unified standard for the selection of urine samples for urine proteomics. It is also unclear whether there are differences in proteomics between whole urine and urine supernatant. Therefore, the urine of preterm infants was used as the research sample to explore the differences in protein profiles between the whole urine and urine supernatant of preterm infants by proteomics. Methods Urine samples were collected from five preterm infants with a gestational age of less than 28 weeks at their corrected gestational age of 37 weeks. Each preterm urine was divided into whole urine and supernatant. Urine protein was extracted and analyzed by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS /MS). Results The two groups of urine samples did not show significant clustering in the principal component analysis. A total of 2607 proteins were detected in the two groups of urine samples, of which 82 proteins were unique to whole urine samples and 56 proteins were unique to urine supernatant samples. The molecular functions, the main biological processes and subcellular localization of the differential proteins were analyzed. In other neonatal-related diseases, there was no significant difference in protein enrichment between whole urine and urine supernatant. Conclusions This study analyzed the differences between whole urine and urine supernatant in urine proteomics of preterm infants. In neonatal-related diseases, there is no significant difference in urinary protein biomarkers between whole urine and urine supernatant.</p>","PeriodicalId":17813,"journal":{"name":"Kidney & blood pressure research","volume":" ","pages":"1-18"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kidney & blood pressure research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000543714","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction Urine proteomics plays an important role in the screening of biomarkers for infant diseases. However, there is no unified standard for the selection of urine samples for urine proteomics. It is also unclear whether there are differences in proteomics between whole urine and urine supernatant. Therefore, the urine of preterm infants was used as the research sample to explore the differences in protein profiles between the whole urine and urine supernatant of preterm infants by proteomics. Methods Urine samples were collected from five preterm infants with a gestational age of less than 28 weeks at their corrected gestational age of 37 weeks. Each preterm urine was divided into whole urine and supernatant. Urine protein was extracted and analyzed by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS /MS). Results The two groups of urine samples did not show significant clustering in the principal component analysis. A total of 2607 proteins were detected in the two groups of urine samples, of which 82 proteins were unique to whole urine samples and 56 proteins were unique to urine supernatant samples. The molecular functions, the main biological processes and subcellular localization of the differential proteins were analyzed. In other neonatal-related diseases, there was no significant difference in protein enrichment between whole urine and urine supernatant. Conclusions This study analyzed the differences between whole urine and urine supernatant in urine proteomics of preterm infants. In neonatal-related diseases, there is no significant difference in urinary protein biomarkers between whole urine and urine supernatant.
期刊介绍:
This journal comprises both clinical and basic studies at the interface of nephrology, hypertension and cardiovascular research. The topics to be covered include the structural organization and biochemistry of the normal and diseased kidney, the molecular biology of transporters, the physiology and pathophysiology of glomerular filtration and tubular transport, endothelial and vascular smooth muscle cell function and blood pressure control, as well as water, electrolyte and mineral metabolism. Also discussed are the (patho)physiology and (patho) biochemistry of renal hormones, the molecular biology, genetics and clinical course of renal disease and hypertension, the renal elimination, action and clinical use of drugs, as well as dialysis and transplantation. Featuring peer-reviewed original papers, editorials translating basic science into patient-oriented research and disease, in depth reviews, and regular special topic sections, ''Kidney & Blood Pressure Research'' is an important source of information for researchers in nephrology and cardiovascular medicine.