Alan Paciorek, Claire Mulvey, Meg McKinley, Li Zhang, Iona Cheng, Farhana Moon, Bryan Khuong Le, Brandon E Shih, Julia Whitman, Emily Bergsland
{"title":"Burdens of Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasm by Diverse Race and Ethnicities- A Rigorous Structural Equation Modeling.","authors":"Alan Paciorek, Claire Mulvey, Meg McKinley, Li Zhang, Iona Cheng, Farhana Moon, Bryan Khuong Le, Brandon E Shih, Julia Whitman, Emily Bergsland","doi":"10.6004/jnccn.2024.7080","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>It is unclear whether patients of all races and ethnicities with gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) neuroendocrine neoplasm (NEN) have equivalent incidence and cancer-specific survival.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Using the California Cancer Registry, all patients with GEP-NEN in California's large and diverse population from 1992 to 2019 were identified. Age-adjusted incidence rates (AIRs) and cancer-specific mortality (CSM) risks were compared across racial and ethnic subgroups using structural equation modeling.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The non-Hispanic (NH) Black population had the highest rate of diagnosis every year (AIR2019, 7.4 per 100,000; 95% CI, 6.4-8.5). The AIRs across races and ethnicities and primary sites vary, and in 2019 statistically significantly increased for stomach, small intestine, pancreatic, and rectal NEN and for only the NH White population. Risk of mortality was neutral across many races and ethnicities for many primary sites. The only statistically significant disparity was a higher CSM rate for Hispanic patients compared with NH Black patients with small intestine NEN (subdistribution hazard ratio, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.10-1.91; P=.008). Findings suggest a higher CSM among NH Black and NH White patients with rectal NEN. Disparities in who presents with GEP-NEN were revealed across racial and ethnic populations and primary sites. The NH Black population incurred the highest rate overall consistently every year. This is the first study to evaluate cancer-specific survival disparities in all GEP-NEN primary sites across the Asian American/Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander, Hispanic, NH Black, and NH White racial and ethnic populations. Many clinical and sociodemographic measures associated with risk of mortality differed across race and ethnicities. After careful control of those imbalances, there were few racial and ethnic disparities in risk of CSM.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There is room to improve equity in the health care system and close the gap in diagnoses for the NH Black population with all GEP-NEN and in mortality for the Hispanic population with small intestine NEN.</p>","PeriodicalId":17483,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network","volume":"23 2","pages":"27-32"},"PeriodicalIF":14.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6004/jnccn.2024.7080","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: It is unclear whether patients of all races and ethnicities with gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) neuroendocrine neoplasm (NEN) have equivalent incidence and cancer-specific survival.
Patients and methods: Using the California Cancer Registry, all patients with GEP-NEN in California's large and diverse population from 1992 to 2019 were identified. Age-adjusted incidence rates (AIRs) and cancer-specific mortality (CSM) risks were compared across racial and ethnic subgroups using structural equation modeling.
Results: The non-Hispanic (NH) Black population had the highest rate of diagnosis every year (AIR2019, 7.4 per 100,000; 95% CI, 6.4-8.5). The AIRs across races and ethnicities and primary sites vary, and in 2019 statistically significantly increased for stomach, small intestine, pancreatic, and rectal NEN and for only the NH White population. Risk of mortality was neutral across many races and ethnicities for many primary sites. The only statistically significant disparity was a higher CSM rate for Hispanic patients compared with NH Black patients with small intestine NEN (subdistribution hazard ratio, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.10-1.91; P=.008). Findings suggest a higher CSM among NH Black and NH White patients with rectal NEN. Disparities in who presents with GEP-NEN were revealed across racial and ethnic populations and primary sites. The NH Black population incurred the highest rate overall consistently every year. This is the first study to evaluate cancer-specific survival disparities in all GEP-NEN primary sites across the Asian American/Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander, Hispanic, NH Black, and NH White racial and ethnic populations. Many clinical and sociodemographic measures associated with risk of mortality differed across race and ethnicities. After careful control of those imbalances, there were few racial and ethnic disparities in risk of CSM.
Conclusions: There is room to improve equity in the health care system and close the gap in diagnoses for the NH Black population with all GEP-NEN and in mortality for the Hispanic population with small intestine NEN.
期刊介绍:
JNCCN—Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network is a peer-reviewed medical journal read by over 25,000 oncologists and cancer care professionals nationwide. This indexed publication delivers the latest insights into best clinical practices, oncology health services research, and translational medicine. Notably, JNCCN provides updates on the NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology® (NCCN Guidelines®), review articles elaborating on guideline recommendations, health services research, and case reports that spotlight molecular insights in patient care.
Guided by its vision, JNCCN seeks to advance the mission of NCCN by serving as the primary resource for information on NCCN Guidelines®, innovation in translational medicine, and scientific studies related to oncology health services research. This encompasses quality care and value, bioethics, comparative and cost effectiveness, public policy, and interventional research on supportive care and survivorship.
JNCCN boasts indexing by prominent databases such as MEDLINE/PubMed, Chemical Abstracts, Embase, EmCare, and Scopus, reinforcing its standing as a reputable source for comprehensive information in the field of oncology.