Association between snack parenting style and dental caries status of children aged 7-8 years: a sequential mixed method approach.

IF 2 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-13 DOI:10.1007/s40368-025-01003-y
Y Selvaraj, P R GeethaPriya, S Asokan, S Viswanath
{"title":"Association between snack parenting style and dental caries status of children aged 7-8 years: a sequential mixed method approach.","authors":"Y Selvaraj, P R GeethaPriya, S Asokan, S Viswanath","doi":"10.1007/s40368-025-01003-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Literature search shows that there is less evidence of the association between snack parenting styles and dental caries. This study aimed to assess the snack parenting style of mothers of children aged 7-8 years and its association with the dental caries status of their children.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study used a sequential mixed-method approach. In the quantitative phase, the Parenting around SNAcking Questionnaire (P-SNAQ) was used to assess the snack parenting style of mothers. DMFT/deft indices were used to record the dental caries status of their children. In the qualitative phase, in-depth face-to-face interviews were conducted. Through a thematic approach, codes and themes were derived.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 600 mother-child pairs participated. Autonomy support was the most common type of snack parenting style (n = 283). There was no significant association between snack parenting style and children's dental caries status. Five themes were derived: (1) Scenarios of snacking; (2) Parental factors affecting snacking; (3) Snack intake influencers; (4) Unhealthy strands; (5) Healthy alternatives.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Snack parenting styles did not influence the dental caries status of children. Those who had snack regulations at home or school were more likely to prefer healthy snacks. Mothers expressed the need for branded healthy snacks.</p>","PeriodicalId":47603,"journal":{"name":"European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry","volume":" ","pages":"667-678"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40368-025-01003-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Literature search shows that there is less evidence of the association between snack parenting styles and dental caries. This study aimed to assess the snack parenting style of mothers of children aged 7-8 years and its association with the dental caries status of their children.

Methods: This study used a sequential mixed-method approach. In the quantitative phase, the Parenting around SNAcking Questionnaire (P-SNAQ) was used to assess the snack parenting style of mothers. DMFT/deft indices were used to record the dental caries status of their children. In the qualitative phase, in-depth face-to-face interviews were conducted. Through a thematic approach, codes and themes were derived.

Results: A total of 600 mother-child pairs participated. Autonomy support was the most common type of snack parenting style (n = 283). There was no significant association between snack parenting style and children's dental caries status. Five themes were derived: (1) Scenarios of snacking; (2) Parental factors affecting snacking; (3) Snack intake influencers; (4) Unhealthy strands; (5) Healthy alternatives.

Conclusion: Snack parenting styles did not influence the dental caries status of children. Those who had snack regulations at home or school were more likely to prefer healthy snacks. Mothers expressed the need for branded healthy snacks.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
7-8岁儿童零食教养方式与龋齿状况的关系:一项顺序混合方法研究
目的:文献检索表明,很少有证据表明零食养育方式与龋齿之间的联系。本研究旨在评估7-8岁儿童母亲的零食养育方式及其与孩子龋齿状况的关系。方法:本研究采用顺序混合方法。在定量阶段,采用《零食父母教养问卷》(P-SNAQ)对母亲的零食教养方式进行评估。采用DMFT/deft指数记录儿童龋病状况。在定性阶段,进行了深入的面对面访谈。通过主题方法,推导出代码和主题。结果:共600对母子参与。自主支持是最常见的零食育儿方式(n = 283)。吃零食的父母教养方式与儿童龋齿状况之间无显著关联。衍生出五个主题:(1)零食场景;(2)父母因素对零食的影响;(3)零食摄入影响因素;(4)不健康的股线;(5)健康的替代品。结论:零食教养方式对儿童龋病状况无影响。那些在家里或学校有零食规定的人更喜欢健康的零食。母亲们表达了对品牌健康零食的需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry
European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
9.10%
发文量
81
期刊介绍: The aim and scope of European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry (EAPD) is to promote research in all aspects of dentistry for children, including interceptive orthodontics and studies on children and young adults with special needs. The EAPD focuses on the publication and critical evaluation of clinical and basic science research related to children. The EAPD will consider clinical case series reports, followed by the relevant literature review, only where there are new and important findings of interest to Paediatric Dentistry and where details of techniques or treatment carried out and the success of such approaches are given.
期刊最新文献
Prevalence of molar incisor hypomineralisation and associated factors amongst 8-year-olds in Ireland. The RMS-Pictorial Scale: cross-cultural adaptation and validation for Brazilian children and adolescents. Incidental findings from cone-beam computed tomography in children and adolescents: a systematic review. Children with unilateral molar-incisor hypomineralisation (MIH) may exhibit contralateral temporalis and masseter muscle hyperactivity: a cross-sectional study. Root resorption pattern and root length of mandibular primary molars in children: a cross-sectional radiographic study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1