Clinical Prediction Score for Successful Liberation from Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support in Cardiogenic Shock Patients.

IF 5.8 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Canadian Journal of Cardiology Pub Date : 2025-02-11 DOI:10.1016/j.cjca.2025.02.009
Stefania Sacchi, Angela Venuti, Francesca Maria Gobbi, Alessia Gambaro, Luca Baldetti, Francesco Calvo, Mario Gramegna, Vittorio Pazzanese, Beatrice Peveri, Lorenzo Cianfanelli, Giovanni Lino Cardillo, Flavio Luciano Ribichini, Silvia Ajello, Anna Mara Scandroglio
{"title":"Clinical Prediction Score for Successful Liberation from Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support in Cardiogenic Shock Patients.","authors":"Stefania Sacchi, Angela Venuti, Francesca Maria Gobbi, Alessia Gambaro, Luca Baldetti, Francesco Calvo, Mario Gramegna, Vittorio Pazzanese, Beatrice Peveri, Lorenzo Cianfanelli, Giovanni Lino Cardillo, Flavio Luciano Ribichini, Silvia Ajello, Anna Mara Scandroglio","doi":"10.1016/j.cjca.2025.02.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In cardiogenic shock (CS) patients requiring temporary mechanical circulatory support (tMCS), assessing cardiac recovery versus the need for heart replacement therapy is critical. We developed and validated a new clinical score aimed at predicting successful tMCS liberation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cohort of 80 CS patients treated with Impella support between January 2018 and December 2020 was analyzed. Hemodynamic, echocardiographic, and laboratory data were collected at baseline, 24h, 48h, and 96h after device insertion. Patients were classified as successfully or unsuccessfully liberated from tMCS, based on recovery versus progression to death, LVAD implantation, or heart transplant. The W-score, derived using independent predictors of successful liberation, was validated in two cohorts: 86 CS patients at our center and 23 patients from an external center.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 80 patients (mean age 62.5 ± 11.8 years, 63.7% AMI-CS), 47.5% achieved successful tMCS liberation. Independent predictors included LVEF, NT-proBNP, and inotropic score at 24h, along with creatinine and lactate at 96h (AUC ≥ 0.7, p < 0.05). The W-score, using a cut-off of ≥7, demonstrated good diagnostic accuracy (AUC 0.92, sensitivity 80%, specificity 85%, p < 0.001). In validation cohorts, a score ≥7 predicted successful liberation with AUCs of 0.80 (p < 0.001) and 0.72 (p < 0.015) at the internal and external centers, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The W-score, based on key parameters at 24 and 96 hours post-tMCS, effectively supports clinicians in identifying CS patients likely to achieve successful tMCS liberation.</p>","PeriodicalId":9555,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Cardiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjca.2025.02.009","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In cardiogenic shock (CS) patients requiring temporary mechanical circulatory support (tMCS), assessing cardiac recovery versus the need for heart replacement therapy is critical. We developed and validated a new clinical score aimed at predicting successful tMCS liberation.

Methods: A cohort of 80 CS patients treated with Impella support between January 2018 and December 2020 was analyzed. Hemodynamic, echocardiographic, and laboratory data were collected at baseline, 24h, 48h, and 96h after device insertion. Patients were classified as successfully or unsuccessfully liberated from tMCS, based on recovery versus progression to death, LVAD implantation, or heart transplant. The W-score, derived using independent predictors of successful liberation, was validated in two cohorts: 86 CS patients at our center and 23 patients from an external center.

Results: Among the 80 patients (mean age 62.5 ± 11.8 years, 63.7% AMI-CS), 47.5% achieved successful tMCS liberation. Independent predictors included LVEF, NT-proBNP, and inotropic score at 24h, along with creatinine and lactate at 96h (AUC ≥ 0.7, p < 0.05). The W-score, using a cut-off of ≥7, demonstrated good diagnostic accuracy (AUC 0.92, sensitivity 80%, specificity 85%, p < 0.001). In validation cohorts, a score ≥7 predicted successful liberation with AUCs of 0.80 (p < 0.001) and 0.72 (p < 0.015) at the internal and external centers, respectively.

Conclusions: The W-score, based on key parameters at 24 and 96 hours post-tMCS, effectively supports clinicians in identifying CS patients likely to achieve successful tMCS liberation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Canadian Journal of Cardiology
Canadian Journal of Cardiology 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
8.10%
发文量
546
审稿时长
32 days
期刊介绍: The Canadian Journal of Cardiology (CJC) is the official journal of the Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS). The CJC is a vehicle for the international dissemination of new knowledge in cardiology and cardiovascular science, particularly serving as the major venue for Canadian cardiovascular medicine.
期刊最新文献
Mechanisms and Prognosis of Intolerance to Angiotensin Receptor Neprilysin Inhibitors in Advanced Heart Failure: Insights from Vasodilator Challenge. New Insights into Genetic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathies. Pulmonary Ridge Coverage: A Two-Edged Sword in Left Atrial Appendage Closure with LAmbre. Integrative Omics Approaches in Cardiovascular Disease Research: Current Trends and Future Directions. Long-Term Outcomes of Fontan Patients with an Extracardiac Conduit: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1