Contemporary Landscape of Medical Technology in Gastroenterology Between 2013 and 2023.

IF 7.6 1区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY American Journal of Gastroenterology Pub Date : 2025-02-14 DOI:10.14309/ajg.0000000000003359
Megan M Hennessey, Shan Xue, Rebecca Z Strigenz, Pamela Bagley, Eric D Shah
{"title":"Contemporary Landscape of Medical Technology in Gastroenterology Between 2013 and 2023.","authors":"Megan M Hennessey, Shan Xue, Rebecca Z Strigenz, Pamela Bagley, Eric D Shah","doi":"10.14309/ajg.0000000000003359","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Medical technology in gastroenterology spans devices, point-of-care diagnostics, digital health, and artificial intelligence. We conducted a narrative review of US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-reviewed medical technology on the available evidence base to support uptake in clinical practice. Seven hundred thirteen new gastrointestinal devices were FDA approved or cleared between 2013 and 2023. The most frequent technologies had indications for use in general endoscopy (442 or 62.0% of all new technologies) with advanced endoscopy technologies being the second most common (172 or 24.1%). Ninety-nine new technologies had indications for use outside of the endoscopy suite. Ninety-nine percent of new technologies were FDA cleared against existing technologies through the 510(k) pathway rather than approved on new clinical data. Among the 19 devices with clinical trial data, trials were limited in sample size and generally evaluated disease-related changes or technical success rather than patient-reported outcomes that anchor drug trials. Twelve devices (63.2%) had favorable, published cost-effective data. To promote evidence-based discussion and uptake of new technology, and especially disruptive or high-risk technology, we propose a practical framework informed by balancing probable efficacy and safety and considering cost-effectiveness.</p>","PeriodicalId":7608,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Gastroenterology","volume":" ","pages":"2009-2026"},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12350751/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14309/ajg.0000000000003359","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Medical technology in gastroenterology spans devices, point-of-care diagnostics, digital health, and artificial intelligence. We conducted a narrative review of US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-reviewed medical technology on the available evidence base to support uptake in clinical practice. Seven hundred thirteen new gastrointestinal devices were FDA approved or cleared between 2013 and 2023. The most frequent technologies had indications for use in general endoscopy (442 or 62.0% of all new technologies) with advanced endoscopy technologies being the second most common (172 or 24.1%). Ninety-nine new technologies had indications for use outside of the endoscopy suite. Ninety-nine percent of new technologies were FDA cleared against existing technologies through the 510(k) pathway rather than approved on new clinical data. Among the 19 devices with clinical trial data, trials were limited in sample size and generally evaluated disease-related changes or technical success rather than patient-reported outcomes that anchor drug trials. Twelve devices (63.2%) had favorable, published cost-effective data. To promote evidence-based discussion and uptake of new technology, and especially disruptive or high-risk technology, we propose a practical framework informed by balancing probable efficacy and safety and considering cost-effectiveness.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2013年至2023年胃肠病学医学技术的当代景观。
摘要:胃肠病学的医疗技术涵盖设备、护理点诊断、数字健康和人工智能。我们在现有证据基础上对美国食品和药物管理局审查的医疗技术进行了叙述性回顾,以支持在临床实践中的应用。2013年至2023年间,fda批准或批准了713种新的GI器械。最常见的技术有一般内窥镜适应症(442项,占所有新技术的62.0%),第二常见的是先进内窥镜技术(172项,占24.1%)。99项新技术有内窥镜检查套件以外使用的适应症。99%的新技术是通过510(k)途径获得fda批准的,而不是通过新的临床数据获得批准。在有临床试验数据的19种设备中,试验样本量有限,通常评估与疾病相关的变化或技术成功,而不是锚定药物试验的患者报告的结果。12个设备(63.2%)有良好的、公布的成本效益数据。为了促进基于证据的讨论和新技术的采用,特别是破坏性或高风险技术,我们提出了一个实用的框架,通过平衡可能的有效性和安全性并考虑成本效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
American Journal of Gastroenterology
American Journal of Gastroenterology 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
5.10%
发文量
458
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Published on behalf of the American College of Gastroenterology (ACG), The American Journal of Gastroenterology (AJG) stands as the foremost clinical journal in the fields of gastroenterology and hepatology. AJG offers practical and professional support to clinicians addressing the most prevalent gastroenterological disorders in patients.
期刊最新文献
Optimal Single or Combined Parameters for Dyssynergic Defecation on Anorectal Manometry: A Proof-of-Concept Machine Learning Study. Correction to Higher Rate of Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis Recurrence With Secondary Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis Prophylaxis Compared With No Prophylaxis in 2 National Cirrhosis Cohorts. Impact of Alkaline Phosphatase Normalization on Complication-Free Survival in Primary Biliary Cholangitis. The Augmented Colonoscopy With Computer-Aided Polyp Characterization Study: Prospective Study Comparing the Diagnostic Reliability of Optical Diagnosis of Trainees With Experts Without Artificial Intelligence. Optimizing the Cost-Effective Evaluation of Gastroesophageal Reflux by Typical Symptom Phenotypes After Failure of Empiric Acid Suppression Trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1