Assessing the safety of topical minoxidil through disproportionality analysis of FAERS reports.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Expert Opinion on Drug Safety Pub Date : 2025-02-17 DOI:10.1080/14740338.2025.2467816
Yanbo Li, Bo Liu, Wei Wu, Jian Li
{"title":"Assessing the safety of topical minoxidil through disproportionality analysis of FAERS reports.","authors":"Yanbo Li, Bo Liu, Wei Wu, Jian Li","doi":"10.1080/14740338.2025.2467816","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Topical minoxidil, approved by the FDA in the 1980s, has been widely used to manage androgenetic alopecia. While effective, several adverse events (AEs) related to its use, especially those not well-documented on product labels, remain a concern.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the safety of topical minoxidil by analyzing AEs reported in the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) from 2004 to 2024, focusing on identifying potential risk signals not highlighted on current product labels.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adverse event reports (AERs) from FAERS, where topical minoxidil was identified as the primary suspect, were analyzed. Disproportionality analysis methods, Reporting Odds Ratio (ROR), Proportional Reporting Ratio (PRR), Bayesian Confidence Propagation Neural Network (BCPNN), and Multi-Item Gamma Poisson Shrinker (MGPS), were used to assess the relationship between minoxidil and reported AEs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 45,130 reports, most were from males (50.88%) and showed a significant increase in incidents since 2015. Newly identified AEs, such as application site acne and cysts, were observed. These AEs are not well represented on product labels.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study identified previously unreported AEs linked to topical minoxidil, underscoring the need for updated patient information and regulatory reassessment to enhance safety and inform clinical practices.</p>","PeriodicalId":12232,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14740338.2025.2467816","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Topical minoxidil, approved by the FDA in the 1980s, has been widely used to manage androgenetic alopecia. While effective, several adverse events (AEs) related to its use, especially those not well-documented on product labels, remain a concern.

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the safety of topical minoxidil by analyzing AEs reported in the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) from 2004 to 2024, focusing on identifying potential risk signals not highlighted on current product labels.

Methods: Adverse event reports (AERs) from FAERS, where topical minoxidil was identified as the primary suspect, were analyzed. Disproportionality analysis methods, Reporting Odds Ratio (ROR), Proportional Reporting Ratio (PRR), Bayesian Confidence Propagation Neural Network (BCPNN), and Multi-Item Gamma Poisson Shrinker (MGPS), were used to assess the relationship between minoxidil and reported AEs.

Results: Among 45,130 reports, most were from males (50.88%) and showed a significant increase in incidents since 2015. Newly identified AEs, such as application site acne and cysts, were observed. These AEs are not well represented on product labels.

Conclusion: The study identified previously unreported AEs linked to topical minoxidil, underscoring the need for updated patient information and regulatory reassessment to enhance safety and inform clinical practices.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
3.20%
发文量
97
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Expert Opinion on Drug Safety ranks #62 of 216 in the Pharmacology & Pharmacy category in the 2008 ISI Journal Citation Reports. Expert Opinion on Drug Safety (ISSN 1474-0338 [print], 1744-764X [electronic]) is a MEDLINE-indexed, peer-reviewed, international journal publishing review articles on all aspects of drug safety and original papers on the clinical implications of drug treatment safety issues, providing expert opinion on the scope for future development.
期刊最新文献
Comparative safety analysis of Hedgehog inhibitor preparations: insights from the FAERS database. Hepatic adverse events associated with anaplastic lymphoma kinase tyrosine kinase inhibitors: a disproportionality analysis based on FAERS database and analysis of drug-gene interaction network. Post-marketing safety assessment of constipation drugs: a real-world pharmacovigilance study based on FAERS database. Assessment of adverse events of the novel antiepileptic drug lamotrigine: a real-world pharmacovigilance study based on FAERS. Drug-induced skin ulcer: real-world pharmacovigilance analysis based on the FDA adverse event reporting system.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1