Assessing the safety of topical minoxidil through disproportionality analysis of FAERS reports.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Expert Opinion on Drug Safety Pub Date : 2025-02-17 DOI:10.1080/14740338.2025.2467816
Yanbo Li, Bo Liu, Wei Wu, Jian Li
{"title":"Assessing the safety of topical minoxidil through disproportionality analysis of FAERS reports.","authors":"Yanbo Li, Bo Liu, Wei Wu, Jian Li","doi":"10.1080/14740338.2025.2467816","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Topical minoxidil, approved by the FDA in the 1980s, has been widely used to manage androgenetic alopecia. While effective, several adverse events (AEs) related to its use, especially those not well-documented on product labels, remain a concern.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the safety of topical minoxidil by analyzing AEs reported in the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) from 2004 to 2024, focusing on identifying potential risk signals not highlighted on current product labels.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adverse event reports (AERs) from FAERS, where topical minoxidil was identified as the primary suspect, were analyzed. Disproportionality analysis methods, Reporting Odds Ratio (ROR), Proportional Reporting Ratio (PRR), Bayesian Confidence Propagation Neural Network (BCPNN), and Multi-Item Gamma Poisson Shrinker (MGPS), were used to assess the relationship between minoxidil and reported AEs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 45,130 reports, most were from males (50.88%) and showed a significant increase in incidents since 2015. Newly identified AEs, such as application site acne and cysts, were observed. These AEs are not well represented on product labels.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study identified previously unreported AEs linked to topical minoxidil, underscoring the need for updated patient information and regulatory reassessment to enhance safety and inform clinical practices.</p>","PeriodicalId":12232,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14740338.2025.2467816","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Topical minoxidil, approved by the FDA in the 1980s, has been widely used to manage androgenetic alopecia. While effective, several adverse events (AEs) related to its use, especially those not well-documented on product labels, remain a concern.

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the safety of topical minoxidil by analyzing AEs reported in the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) from 2004 to 2024, focusing on identifying potential risk signals not highlighted on current product labels.

Methods: Adverse event reports (AERs) from FAERS, where topical minoxidil was identified as the primary suspect, were analyzed. Disproportionality analysis methods, Reporting Odds Ratio (ROR), Proportional Reporting Ratio (PRR), Bayesian Confidence Propagation Neural Network (BCPNN), and Multi-Item Gamma Poisson Shrinker (MGPS), were used to assess the relationship between minoxidil and reported AEs.

Results: Among 45,130 reports, most were from males (50.88%) and showed a significant increase in incidents since 2015. Newly identified AEs, such as application site acne and cysts, were observed. These AEs are not well represented on product labels.

Conclusion: The study identified previously unreported AEs linked to topical minoxidil, underscoring the need for updated patient information and regulatory reassessment to enhance safety and inform clinical practices.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过FAERS报告的歧化分析评估外用米诺地尔的安全性。
背景:外用米诺地尔于20世纪80年代获得FDA批准,被广泛用于治疗雄激素性脱发。虽然有效,但与使用相关的一些不良事件(ae),特别是那些没有在产品标签上充分记录的不良事件,仍然令人担忧。目的:本研究旨在通过分析2004年至2024年FDA不良事件报告系统(FAERS)中报告的ae,评估外用米诺地尔的安全性,重点识别当前产品标签上未强调的潜在风险信号。方法:对来自FAERS的不良事件报告(AERs)进行分析,其中外用米诺地尔被确定为主要嫌疑人。使用歧化分析方法,报告优势比(ROR)、比例报告比(PRR)、贝叶斯置信传播神经网络(BCPNN)和多项目伽玛泊松收缩器(MGPS)来评估米诺地尔与报告的ae之间的关系。结果:45130例报告中,以男性居多(50.88%),2015年以来发生率显著上升。观察到新发现的ae,如应用部位痤疮和囊肿。这些ae在产品标签上没有很好地表示。结论:该研究确定了先前未报道的与局部米诺地尔相关的ae,强调了更新患者信息和监管重新评估的必要性,以提高安全性并为临床实践提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
3.20%
发文量
97
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Expert Opinion on Drug Safety ranks #62 of 216 in the Pharmacology & Pharmacy category in the 2008 ISI Journal Citation Reports. Expert Opinion on Drug Safety (ISSN 1474-0338 [print], 1744-764X [electronic]) is a MEDLINE-indexed, peer-reviewed, international journal publishing review articles on all aspects of drug safety and original papers on the clinical implications of drug treatment safety issues, providing expert opinion on the scope for future development.
期刊最新文献
GLP-1-derived therapies and risk of sarcopenia: myth or reality? Cardiorenometabolic medicine as a new subspecialty in the light of novel pharmaceuticals with dual or triple benefits. Lessons from examining the safety of drugs for COVID-19 during pregnancy. Who is missing from SGLT-2 inhibitor trials? Implications for drug safety and generalizability: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Risk of active tuberculosis and herpes zoster with tumor necrosis factor inhibitor treatment in adults with autoimmune disease conditions: a systematic trial sequential analysis of randomized placebo-controlled clinical trials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1