Electron density derived from dual-energy CT for predicting thrombolytic therapeutic efficacy in patients with pulmonary embolism.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Japanese Journal of Radiology Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-14 DOI:10.1007/s11604-025-01747-z
Hiroaki Nagano, Koji Takumi, Erina Nagano, Ryota Nakanosono, Masatoyo Nakajo, Kiyohisa Kamimura, Masanori Nakajo, Fumiko Kanzaki, Fumitaka Ejima, Takuro Ayukawa, Tomohito Hasegawa, Tsubasa Nakano, Mitsuho Hirahara, Takashi Yoshiura
{"title":"Electron density derived from dual-energy CT for predicting thrombolytic therapeutic efficacy in patients with pulmonary embolism.","authors":"Hiroaki Nagano, Koji Takumi, Erina Nagano, Ryota Nakanosono, Masatoyo Nakajo, Kiyohisa Kamimura, Masanori Nakajo, Fumiko Kanzaki, Fumitaka Ejima, Takuro Ayukawa, Tomohito Hasegawa, Tsubasa Nakano, Mitsuho Hirahara, Takashi Yoshiura","doi":"10.1007/s11604-025-01747-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To clarify the usefulness of electron density (ED) using dual-energy CT (DECT) parameters for predicting treatment response in patients with pulmonary embolism (PE).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The study population comprised 30 patients with PE (49 thrombi) who underwent pretreatment DECT. The study coordinator diagnosed PE using contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) as the gold standard and annotated the location of thrombi on CECT prior to the DECT image analyses. CT attenuation values on conventional 120 kVp, 40 keV, and 70 keV virtual monochromatic (VM) images; effective atomic number; and ED of pretreatment pulmonary thrombi were measured on unenhanced CT. Thrombi were classified into dissolved and residual groups according to the findings of posttreatment follow-up CT. DECT parameters were compared between the two groups using the Mann-Whitney U test. For statistically significant parameters, receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to evaluate their performance for differentiating two groups. Diagnostic accuracy for predicting treatment response in patients with PE was determined by calculating the area under the ROC curve (AUC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ED values, CT values on conventional 120 kVp imaging, and those on 70 keV VM imaging were significantly higher in thrombi in the dissolved group than the residual group (p < 0.001, p = 0.012, p = 0.009, respectively). AUC values for predicting dissolution response by ED, conventional 120 kVp imaging, and 70 keV VM imaging (cut-off value, 3.49 × 10<sup>23</sup>/cm<sup>3</sup>, 53.4 HU, and 50.7 HU, respectively) were 0.856, 0.744, and 0.755, respectively. AUC was significantly higher for ED than for conventional 120 kVp imaging and 70 keV VM imaging (p = 0.032, p = 0.016).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ED derived from unenhanced DECT may help predict therapeutic efficacy in patients with PE.</p>","PeriodicalId":14691,"journal":{"name":"Japanese Journal of Radiology","volume":" ","pages":"958-966"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12125110/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Japanese Journal of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-025-01747-z","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To clarify the usefulness of electron density (ED) using dual-energy CT (DECT) parameters for predicting treatment response in patients with pulmonary embolism (PE).

Materials and methods: The study population comprised 30 patients with PE (49 thrombi) who underwent pretreatment DECT. The study coordinator diagnosed PE using contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) as the gold standard and annotated the location of thrombi on CECT prior to the DECT image analyses. CT attenuation values on conventional 120 kVp, 40 keV, and 70 keV virtual monochromatic (VM) images; effective atomic number; and ED of pretreatment pulmonary thrombi were measured on unenhanced CT. Thrombi were classified into dissolved and residual groups according to the findings of posttreatment follow-up CT. DECT parameters were compared between the two groups using the Mann-Whitney U test. For statistically significant parameters, receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to evaluate their performance for differentiating two groups. Diagnostic accuracy for predicting treatment response in patients with PE was determined by calculating the area under the ROC curve (AUC).

Results: ED values, CT values on conventional 120 kVp imaging, and those on 70 keV VM imaging were significantly higher in thrombi in the dissolved group than the residual group (p < 0.001, p = 0.012, p = 0.009, respectively). AUC values for predicting dissolution response by ED, conventional 120 kVp imaging, and 70 keV VM imaging (cut-off value, 3.49 × 1023/cm3, 53.4 HU, and 50.7 HU, respectively) were 0.856, 0.744, and 0.755, respectively. AUC was significantly higher for ED than for conventional 120 kVp imaging and 70 keV VM imaging (p = 0.032, p = 0.016).

Conclusions: ED derived from unenhanced DECT may help predict therapeutic efficacy in patients with PE.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
双能CT电子密度预测肺栓塞患者溶栓治疗效果。
目的:阐明电子密度(ED)使用双能CT (DECT)参数预测肺栓塞(PE)患者治疗反应的有效性。材料和方法:研究人群包括30例PE患者(49例血栓),他们接受了预处理DECT。研究协调员使用对比增强CT (CECT)作为金标准诊断PE,并在DECT图像分析之前在CECT上注释血栓的位置。常规120 kVp、40 keV和70 keV虚拟单色图像的CT衰减值;有效原子序数;在未增强CT上测量预处理后肺血栓的ED。根据治疗后随访CT结果将血栓分为溶解组和残留组。采用Mann-Whitney U检验比较两组间DECT参数。对于具有统计学意义的参数,采用受试者工作特征(ROC)分析来评估两组患者的表现。预测PE患者治疗反应的诊断准确性通过计算ROC曲线下面积(AUC)来确定。结果:溶栓组血栓的ED值、常规120 kVp成像CT值、70 keV VM成像CT值均显著高于残留组(p 23/cm3、53.4 HU、50.7 HU),分别为0.856、0.744、0.755。ED的AUC明显高于常规的120 kVp成像和70 keV VM成像(p = 0.032, p = 0.016)。结论:未增强DECT引起的ED可能有助于预测PE患者的治疗效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Japanese Journal of Radiology
Japanese Journal of Radiology Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
自引率
4.80%
发文量
133
期刊介绍: Japanese Journal of Radiology is a peer-reviewed journal, officially published by the Japan Radiological Society. The main purpose of the journal is to provide a forum for the publication of papers documenting recent advances and new developments in the field of radiology in medicine and biology. The scope of Japanese Journal of Radiology encompasses but is not restricted to diagnostic radiology, interventional radiology, radiation oncology, nuclear medicine, radiation physics, and radiation biology. Additionally, the journal covers technical and industrial innovations. The journal welcomes original articles, technical notes, review articles, pictorial essays and letters to the editor. The journal also provides announcements from the boards and the committees of the society. Membership in the Japan Radiological Society is not a prerequisite for submission. Contributions are welcomed from all parts of the world.
期刊最新文献
Radiologists' perceived value and readiness for artificial intelligence in value-based radiology: a multicountry survey. Conventional MRI/CT for differentiation of IDH-mutant adult-type diffuse gliomas: revisited with a new imaging feature "scFLAIR-D". Enhancing the performance of BP-MRI VI-RADS in detecting muscle-invasive bladder cancer: the potential role of supplementary quantitative parameters. Japanese clinical practice guidelines for vascular tumors, vascular malformations, lymphatic malformations, and lymphangiomatosis 2022. Deep learning-driven MRI segmentation of choroid plexus volume: a novel biomarker for cognitive impairment in type 2 diabetes mellitus.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1